![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's been a lot of discussion this year on the Cessna Pilot's Association
Forums about lean of peak operation in carb engines with simple instrumentation. I've been experimenting with it and flying this way a lot. LOP is actually easier than the "find peak and the enrich 50 - 75 degree" method that I was taught. CHT's are no higher than running at the same power output ROP and sometimes slightly lower. Here is 3 meg Windows Media video file showing our O-320 H2AD being leaned from peak to 75 LOP and then back to 25 LOP. The operation is repeated to show the knob movement. Note how smooth the engine sounds with carb heat on when leaned to about a 100 RPM drop. Throttle was full open and CHT were right where they are shown 20 minutes later. This video was taken at 5500 feet. http://baldeagleflyingclub.org/LOP.wmv -- Roger Long |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger Long wrote:
Note how smooth the engine sounds with carb heat on when leaned to about a 100 RPM drop. Throttle was full open and CHT were right where they are shown 20 minutes later. This video was taken at 5500 feet. I did this on a recent cross country flight, 100+ miles each leg. The oil temps ran higher than normal, as well as EGT's. I wasn't running WOT and was only at 3500' ASL. We don't have CHT instrumentation and what we do have is analog... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A 25 LOP EGT will be 50 degrees higher than 75 ROP but changes the mixture
creates in the combustion timing offset this so that CHT is usually the same or slightly lower. This small difference in EGT has no effect on the engine or exhaust system whatever. Hard to say what was going on without at least one cylinder of CHT data. None of this should effect your oil tempearature. Ours runs the same in the winter as the summer because the thermostat just sends more or less through the oil cooler. An important part of operating an engine without an all cylinder analyzer this way is to keep power settings at or below 60%. You should make up a table from your POH for reference but flying with carb heat on will make the engines like the O-320 pretty much self limiting. It also improves the mixture distribution so that the engine will run leaner with acceptable smoothness. The drop off in RPM and onset of roughness is less abrupt and more predictable with carb heat on. I now use WOT for almost all cruise above 3000 feet. You can read more he http://baldeagleflyingclub.org/Manual.htm -- Roger Long "Darrel Toepfer" wrote in message . .. Roger Long wrote: Note how smooth the engine sounds with carb heat on when leaned to about a 100 RPM drop. Throttle was full open and CHT were right where they are shown 20 minutes later. This video was taken at 5500 feet. I did this on a recent cross country flight, 100+ miles each leg. The oil temps ran higher than normal, as well as EGT's. I wasn't running WOT and was only at 3500' ASL. We don't have CHT instrumentation and what we do have is analog... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger Long wrote:
A 25 LOP EGT will be 50 degrees higher than 75 ROP but changes the mixture creates in the combustion timing offset this so that CHT is usually the same or slightly lower. This small difference in EGT has no effect on the engine or exhaust system whatever. Hard to say what was going on without at least one cylinder of CHT data. I'd like to add one of those digital wonders one day. Next project is to replace the baffle gasketing, they're getting limp... None of this should effect your oil tempearature. Ours runs the same in the winter as the summer because the thermostat just sends more or less through the oil cooler. It went up, just under the redline... An important part of operating an engine without an all cylinder analyzer this way is to keep power settings at or below 60%. You should make up a table from your POH for reference but flying with carb heat on will make the engines like the O-320 pretty much self limiting. It also improves the mixture distribution so that the engine will run leaner with acceptable smoothness. The drop off in RPM and onset of roughness is less abrupt and more predictable with carb heat on. Cont. 0-300D '65 C172F I now use WOT for almost all cruise above 3000 feet. Our concern is not to overrev the engine, or limit WOT to less than 5 minutes... You can read more he http://baldeagleflyingclub.org/Manual.htm Thanks... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:21:37 -0500, Darrel Toepfer
wrote: Our concern is not to overrev the engine, or limit WOT to less than 5 minutes... Do you understand that under leaned conditions and above a certain altitude, say, 7,000 feet, that you cannot achieve engine redline? The altitude limits the engine output due to the lowered oxygen content in the air. WOT cannot harm the engine under this condition because the engine can only produce around 65% to 60% power at that altitude. You might as well run WOT or you may be limiting the engine even more. Corky Scott |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky Scott wrote:
Do you understand that under leaned conditions and above a certain altitude, say, 7,000 feet, that you cannot achieve engine redline? The altitude limits the engine output due to the lowered oxygen content in the air. I do... However I live 44' asl and have never been that high in any of the 5 types I've flown sofar... WOT cannot harm the engine under this condition because the engine can only produce around 65% to 60% power at that altitude. You might as well run WOT or you may be limiting the engine even more. Typically we're at 2000' or below, but this plane is a recent purchase and will see more crosscountry time than what we've done previously... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Woah! It sounds like something may be wrong with this engine. Bad baffling
could be it if it is running very hot. Nothing you do with the mixture should make that much difference in oil temperature. If your prop (fixed I assume) conforms to the type certificate, over speed should not be a problem unless you descend without pulling power. That engine should run fine WOT for hours. If you are pulling power after five minutes on a 10 - 20 minute climb, you are making the engine work harder and get hotter. Fix your baffle problems immediately. Make sure you don't have any induction leaks and the engine is set up properly. If you are not a member of the Cessna Pilots Association, join. The $40.00 dues has saved us literally thousands. Read Deakin's articles on engine management at Avweb.com. They are mostly about larger and more complicated engines but you'll learn some good stuff about yours. Search the CPA fourms for threads on leaning and engine operation. -- Roger Long "Darrel Toepfer" wrote in message .. . Roger Long wrote: A 25 LOP EGT will be 50 degrees higher than 75 ROP but changes the mixture creates in the combustion timing offset this so that CHT is usually the same or slightly lower. This small difference in EGT has no effect on the engine or exhaust system whatever. Hard to say what was going on without at least one cylinder of CHT data. I'd like to add one of those digital wonders one day. Next project is to replace the baffle gasketing, they're getting limp... None of this should effect your oil tempearature. Ours runs the same in the winter as the summer because the thermostat just sends more or less through the oil cooler. It went up, just under the redline... An important part of operating an engine without an all cylinder analyzer this way is to keep power settings at or below 60%. You should make up a table from your POH for reference but flying with carb heat on will make the engines like the O-320 pretty much self limiting. It also improves the mixture distribution so that the engine will run leaner with acceptable smoothness. The drop off in RPM and onset of roughness is less abrupt and more predictable with carb heat on. Cont. 0-300D '65 C172F I now use WOT for almost all cruise above 3000 feet. Our concern is not to overrev the engine, or limit WOT to less than 5 minutes... You can read more he http://baldeagleflyingclub.org/Manual.htm Thanks... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger Long wrote:
Woah! It sounds like something may be wrong with this engine. Bad baffling could be it if it is running very hot. Nothing you do with the mixture should make that much difference in oil temperature. If your prop (fixed I assume) conforms to the type certificate, over speed should not be a problem unless you descend without pulling power. It was the use of carb heat during leaning that raised the oil temp... That engine should run fine WOT for hours. If you are pulling power after five minutes on a 10 - 20 minute climb, you are making the engine work harder and get hotter. We haven't flown it very high yet... Fix your baffle problems immediately. Make sure you don't have any induction leaks and the engine is set up properly. Yep... If you are not a member of the Cessna Pilots Association, join. The $40.00 dues has saved us literally thousands. Read Deakin's articles on engine management at Avweb.com. They are mostly about larger and more complicated engines but you'll learn some good stuff about yours. Search the CPA fourms for threads on leaning and engine operation. Yep... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lycoming's views on best economy settings | [email protected] | Piloting | 37 | July 8th 04 04:00 PM |
Constant speed props | GE | Piloting | 68 | July 3rd 04 04:08 AM |
Lean of Peak Test Flight | Roger Long | Piloting | 0 | April 22nd 04 10:13 AM |
Why is Melissa Morrison the *STAR* of the video... | X98 | Military Aviation | 1 | March 20th 04 07:39 PM |
Withstanding Peak Temperatures | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 9 | March 2nd 04 02:32 PM |