![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the next few months, I may have a couple of weeks I could dedicate
to earning my instrument rating. I am a PP-SEL with about 100 hours, and my BFR is due in November. Since I'm committed to keeping my ticket, and the instrument rating would meet the BFR requirement, I'm considering one of the "one-week" training programs you see in the flying mags. Does anyone have any experience with them, good or bad? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I didn't do it in one week, but in 10 days. Did all of the studying before that and took the written on the morning of Day 1. If you've got all days and a good CFI, it's doable. The only thing to think about is: are you able to keep up with your rating? If you do the IR in 10 days, you really have to keep flying and practising IFR flying, or your skills will fade pretty fast. I started flying IFR right after the rating with relatively high personal weather limits which I lowered with growing confidence. After a long time without flying in the soup, I'd never fly under minimum conditions - single pilot IFR is just too dangerous to do it half-confident (well, all flying is, I guess ;-)) But do get the rating! It'll add a lot to your flying skills, you'll love it! Happy flying, Patrick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rod,
I would wait for at least a hundred or more hours before going for your Instrument rating. You need time to get comfortable with the aircraft and more ability to tell if it is you or the airplane that is mis-behaving. Stick with one airplane and get very comfortable with it. Take your Instrument training in that airplane. A one week training course is a cram course to pass a test. In my opinion you will learn little other than how to pass the test. This makes you less safe once you have the rating than if you take you time to understand what is going on at each phase of flight. Take you time, you will retain more in the long run and will be safer after the initial rating. Michelle Rod S wrote: In the next few months, I may have a couple of weeks I could dedicate to earning my instrument rating. I am a PP-SEL with about 100 hours, and my BFR is due in November. Since I'm committed to keeping my ticket, and the instrument rating would meet the BFR requirement, I'm considering one of the "one-week" training programs you see in the flying mags. Does anyone have any experience with them, good or bad? -- Michelle P ATP-ASEL, CP-AMEL, and AMT-A&P "Elisabeth" a Maule M-7-235B (no two are alike) Volunteer Pilot, Angel Flight Mid-Atlantic Volunteer Builder, Habitat for Humanity |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Rod S wrote: and my BFR is due in November. Since I'm committed to keeping my ticket, and the instrument rating would meet the BFR requirement, Most instructors would sign you off for a BFR without much additional work if you were already working on your instrument rating. You could also complete a phase of Wings -- I did that and forgot it counted as a BFR! -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How much PIC cross country time do you have? How much simulated instrument?
You need 50 hours PIC cross country time to get an instrument rating, most 100 hour pilots do not have anywhere close to this. Note PIC, your dual cross countries while working on your private do not count, but your solo ones do. The 7 day courses I've seen require you to have the 50 hours CC as a prerequisite. You also need 40 hours hood time, of which most people have about 3 when they are at 100 hours. I would agree with others, you should wait till you have around 200 hours, at 100 hours you're really still learning how to just fly the airplane. Over the next 100 hours, make 50 of them cross country, and bring along a pilot so you can chip away at the 40 hours hood time. You'll get a lot of hood time when you work on your instrument, but doing 40 all at once is going to be hard. Rod S wrote: In the next few months, I may have a couple of weeks I could dedicate to earning my instrument rating. I am a PP-SEL with about 100 hours, and my BFR is due in November. Since I'm committed to keeping my ticket, and the instrument rating would meet the BFR requirement, I'm considering one of the "one-week" training programs you see in the flying mags. Does anyone have any experience with them, good or bad? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As others have stated, unless you have most of the 50 hours of X-country
time nailed down I think it would be next to impossible to complete an instrument rating in a week. I did most of my 50 hour X-country requirement over several months flying "under the hood" also so as to combine the hood time and X-country time simultaneously. During most of these flights we actually filed IFR and so also had the experience of interacting with ATC which is a big part of the equation. I think it'e very possible to do an Instrument rating course in a week, but only if you have the 50 hours X-country time pretty much finished and have done all of the studying and are ready to pass the witten exam (if you have not already done it). Then you can totally dedicate that week to flying approaches and hood time and preparing for the check ride. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't do an accelerated course but I got the IR with about 120TT. If the
accelerated method works best with your schedule then by all means do it. I doubt that motor skills deteriorate any faster if they are aquired quickly than if they are aquired slowly The best way to learn anything seem to be total immersion. You should plan on flyng a lot of actual or simulated instrument time in the 6 months after the checkride. . Mike MU-2 "Rod S" wrote in message ... In the next few months, I may have a couple of weeks I could dedicate to earning my instrument rating. I am a PP-SEL with about 100 hours, and my BFR is due in November. Since I'm committed to keeping my ticket, and the instrument rating would meet the BFR requirement, I'm considering one of the "one-week" training programs you see in the flying mags. Does anyone have any experience with them, good or bad? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:52:35 GMT, kontiki
wrote: As others have stated, unless you have most of the 50 hours of X-country time nailed down I think it would be next to impossible to complete an instrument rating in a week. I did most of my 50 hour X-country requirement over several months flying "under the hood" also so as to combine the hood time and X-country time simultaneously. During most of these flights we actually filed IFR and so also had the experience of interacting with ATC which is a big part of the equation. I thought most of the places that do the 10 day IFR courses are part 141 and thus are exempt from the x-c requirement? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |