![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello erveryone,
I have a question which is: what would be the lightest type of aircraft which would make regular travel for 3-4 persons and luggage to travel between europe and the US? We were thinking about a TBM700, PC12, Mirage, Malibu something like that... any ideas? kind reagrds, Mwise |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a friend who has made the trip several times in a Skylane.
Bob Gardner "mwis" wrote in message ... Hello erveryone, I have a question which is: what would be the lightest type of aircraft which would make regular travel for 3-4 persons and luggage to travel between europe and the US? We were thinking about a TBM700, PC12, Mirage, Malibu something like that... any ideas? kind reagrds, Mwise |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hopefully not with 3 PAX and luggage!
"Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... I have a friend who has made the trip several times in a Skylane. Bob Gardner "mwis" wrote in message ... Hello erveryone, I have a question which is: what would be the lightest type of aircraft which would make regular travel for 3-4 persons and luggage to travel between europe and the US? We were thinking about a TBM700, PC12, Mirage, Malibu something like that... any ideas? kind reagrds, Mwise |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The big word in your post is "regular." Check out this page for examples of some of the routes you have to choose from: http://www.geocities.com/Pipeline/Dr.../bencross.html If regular means once a year during the summer, and you don't mind waiting a few days if the weather goes south, your longest leg can be as short as 500nm. This is just barely within the range of a 172 with 50-gal tanks, just to make the point. Something like an A36 or light twin would probably handle this pretty well, perhaps unmodified. But, if you want to be able to make the trip regularly, and without tons of weather delays, you're going to need a lot more range, and things go downhill very quickly as you need to carry more gas and you need a bigger airplane to carry all that gas and the bigger airplane needs a bigger engine which burns more gas to carry all of that gas which now by the way you need more of... The more relevant question is why would you want to, even if you could? The airlines will gladly take you on the same trip in much less time and with much higher safety, and feed you champagne and strawberries on the way. And their dispatch reliability will put yours to shame. I'd love to do the trip once, just for the sake of doing it, but this is one of those few cases where the numbers really favor the airlines, even if you have money to burn. -cwk. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
transatlantic landing places ? | flut | General Aviation | 1 | September 18th 04 12:20 AM |