![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() First UAS manufacturers demand to fly their unmanned drones among passenger airline traffic in the National Airspace System without complying with the see-and-avoid regulations. Now they are objecting to the federal requirement for pilots of their UAS to hold an airmans certificate. This sort of hubris is almost as repugnant as failing to try a police office who emptied his weapon on an unarmed teen fleeing the hail of bullets. Ah, the joy of life in the 21st century where self-interest trumps public good ..... http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/UAS-Operators-See-FAA-Rule-Backlash223143-1.html UAS Operators See FAA Rule Backlash By Russ Niles | November 23, 2014 A story in Monday's Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/articles/drone-flights-face-faa-hit-1416793905 subscription required) says the FAA's proposed rulemaking on commercial use of unmanned aerial systems will face so much backlash that it could take years to enact. Citing unnamed sources, the Journal says the big sticking point will be the requirement for a private pilot certificate for commercial UAS pilots. There's also angst that the rule will cover all UASs weighing less than 55 pounds, even tiny handheld models that potentially have commercial applications. The FAA announced last week http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Report-FAA-Drone-Rule-Imminent223088-1.html that it intends to have the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) ready by the end of the year and knowledge of its details is apparently spreading and causing controversy. While some aviation groups support the FAA's cautious approach, the UAS industry is predicting major backlash, possibly led by UAS adopters like Amazon and Google, who want to use small UASs for package delivery, at least at first. "I feel like there's a colossal mess coming," Michael Drobec, executive director of the Small UAV Coalition, of which both Amazon and Google are members. He said the rule as he understands it is "so divorced from the technology and the aspirations of this industry that we're going to see a loud rejection." Other countries are taking a much more liberal attitude toward UAS operations. As we reported earlier, Canada has opened up much of the country to line-of-sight small UAS use without direct oversight and created a huge test site for more advanced systems designed to be flown beyond line of sight. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IS28-B2 Operators-help request | S. Murry | Soaring | 1 | July 6th 12 07:22 AM |
Commercial operators at Minden? | Thatcher Smith | Soaring | 2 | April 9th 06 06:14 AM |
Attn: King Air 350 operators | Steve | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 3rd 04 07:30 AM |
Attn: King Air 350 operators | Steve | General Aviation | 0 | January 3rd 04 07:30 AM |
EC 120 pilots and operators | colibri | Rotorcraft | 6 | November 20th 03 01:52 AM |