![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anyone here done anything with the new 3 jug 4 cycle supercharged
engines they're making now? Something like 215HP http://www.seadoo.com/en-US/Watercra.../RXP/Specs.htm Type Supercharged four-stroke, three-cylinder Rotax® SOHC with Intercooler Bore x Stroke 100mm x 63.4mm Displacement/hp 1494 cc / 215 hp Compression ratio 8.5:1 Carburetion / Fuel injection Multi-port fuel injection Lubrication Dry sump, pressure oil system Cooling Closed-loop cooling system Fuel type Regular unleaded |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Regnirps" wrote in message ... (Jay) wrote: Has anyone here done anything with the new 3 jug 4 cycle supercharged engines they're making now? Something like 215HP. It was well described in Popular Science (I think). The SC is mounted to the front to keep the profile low. Note that is it supercharged, not turbocharged -- no waiting for boost. 3 cylinder 4 valve, O to 30 in 1.6 seconds and 0 to 60 in 5.1 or some such waterborne insanity : ) Closed loop cooling is good. I was afraid it needed a steady suppy of cool sea water! I think the power rating was ta over 5,000 RPM so there might be a weight penalty for a health reduction drive. Numerous applications came to mind! -- Charlie Springer We've all seen the V-TEC that Bombardier is working on for Aviation... on a Moose now, but not planned for homebuilts soon. I think given that there are electronic sensors for both engine overhead, and exhaust overheat means that the engine is not meant to run flat out... who really wants to run their SeaDoo at 90 mph all day? I'd estimate a 40 mph cruise wouln't take more that 40 or 50 HP, well under the peak. Put the engine in a plane, and it'd melt. Ed. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would concur, running wide open isn't a melt issue, if it can do it
for 60 seconds it can do it for an hour. It will reach steady state temperature very quickly being as light as it is, from that point on, all waste heat goes out into the environment. The TBO is likely effected but as cheap as these things are (being high volume uncertified) who cares. (Regnirps) wrote in message ... "Ed Bryant" dian wrote: I think given that there are electronic sensors for both engine overhead, and exhaust overheat means that the engine is not meant to run flat out... who really wants to run their SeaDoo at 90 mph all day? I'd estimate a 40 mph cruise wouln't take more that 40 or 50 HP, well under the peak. Put the engine in a plane, and it'd melt. Unless those sensors are there to prevent damage when it is run out of the water for cleaning and rinsing salt out and such. I'd guess it is meant to run WOT all day long towing inner tubes and wake boards. -- Charlie Springer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RV-9A's wing with Rotax 914? | Shin Gou | Home Built | 26 | March 7th 04 08:56 PM |
Rotax maintenance seminar | Julien Mauroy | Home Built | 0 | September 26th 03 03:23 AM |
Jabiru V Rotax reliability? | Joe | Home Built | 11 | September 5th 03 11:09 AM |
Marine Radar in a plane? | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 31 | August 13th 03 06:56 PM |
Marine Radio using Aviation Antennae | Jim Weir | Home Built | 13 | August 12th 03 10:05 PM |