![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We are having a special or Harley-Davidson engine packages.
We were going to have this at Sun-n-Fun butttt... since we didn't make it there, we will go ahead with it now. You can check them out at www.hog-air.com Brett |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to work in a power generation field. We had a picture of a 16" iron
pipe with a Hardley Ableson motor attached. The caption was "If Harleys built aircraft, would you fly?". Also seen a lot of Hardleys pulled over at the side of the road during their Redwood Run here in northern California. But that was the old days. I kinda like their newest stuff that Harley enginners wanted to build back in the 70"s but their dealer network wouldn't let them as they feared that the end user would go for the 4 valve-watercooled stuff. Dale Alexander "Brett" wrote in message om... We are having a special or Harley-Davidson engine packages. We were going to have this at Sun-n-Fun butttt... since we didn't make it there, we will go ahead with it now. You can check them out at www.hog-air.com Brett |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking at the Hog-Air site reminds me of the guy who drew up a
"Breezy Senior" with a Piper Aztec wing (the engine nacelle notches skinned over) and a 8V71T Detroit Diesel turning what looked like a cut down Sea Fury Dowty-Rotol five blader. He was a McDonnell-Douglas engineer and his numbers actually looked good-of course it still only had two seats and went 85 knots. The 350 hp, 2300 lb engine cut into the useful load somewhat. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't mean to disrespect your project but the idea of flying behind
a Harley-Davidson engine-I owned a couple of them before yuppies made them expensive, they were the most cantankerous, oil-leaking things around. With only two cylinders don't you have torsional vibration problems out the wazoo? It seems like a short time ago the homebuilders finally figured out you could use a modern liquid cooled auto engine, now you're running a 1930s air-cooled big displacement twin..Don't get me wrong, if it's reliable I wish you all the success in the world, anything has got to be better than Lycoming for an obsolete product peddled for a king's ransom. I don't know what seems weirder, the sound of a Hog taxiing out or the look on Harley management's faces if this actually becomes popular. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fred Collins" wrote in message om... I don't mean to disrespect your project but the idea of flying behind a Harley-Davidson engine-I owned a couple of them before yuppies made them expensive, they were the most cantankerous, oil-leaking things around. With only two cylinders don't you have torsional vibration problems out the wazoo? The Harley Evolution engine is quite dependable and doesn't leak oil. It runs 10 or so degrees cooler than the shovelhead engine. Having owned and ridden a brand new '89 H-D Softtail Heritage, and now owning a shovelhead from the 70's and a panhead from the 60's I can vouch for the durable, dependable Evo engines. BTW, I have no interest in converting H-D engines to aircraft use and don't know anyone who is doing it. I have visited a H-D to aircraft conversion website once, probably 6 months ago. I'm strictly a Continental and Lycoming kind of a guy. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I don't care how well the engine performs in the bike, putting it in an airplane is just plane(?) dumb. I amd NOT going to bolt a prop on THAT crank. It wasn't designed for anything like prop loads. And, I doubt any assembled crankshaft COULD survive such service. But other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? Richard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Lamb" wrote in message ... I don't care how well the engine performs in the bike, putting it in an airplane is just plane(?) dumb. I amd NOT going to bolt a prop on THAT crank. It wasn't designed for anything like prop loads. And, I doubt any assembled crankshaft COULD survive such service. But other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? Richard Well, I went and looked at the site, Dick, and the engine looks to have a redrive, in which case your argument is all wet. Mrs. Lincoln advises you put your thinking cap on if you have one. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jls wrote:
"Richard Lamb" wrote in message ... I don't care how well the engine performs in the bike, putting it in an airplane is just plane(?) dumb. I amd NOT going to bolt a prop on THAT crank. It wasn't designed for anything like prop loads. And, I doubt any assembled crankshaft COULD survive such service. But other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? Richard Well, I went and looked at the site, Dick, and the engine looks to have a redrive, in which case your argument is all wet. Mrs. Lincoln advises you put your thinking cap on if you have one. Oh, pardon me for not chasing every link on the net. It's still a pinned crankshaft. But, hey, I'm just some nut that don't know nothing. Best of luck. Richard |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(a post from the past - brought to you in person
since I couldn't figure out how to reference a single message from the archives...) refering to a skin vibration issue on an amphibian project. (12/18/2001) ================================================== ========= The structure is built but has serious vibration problems? If it's not something out of balance, then it's probably (oh no!) resonant harmonics. Something I learned here... "brute force works fine, but you have to use enough of it". All things have a natural vibration frequency. When tapped, that's the note they "ring" at. The natural resonant frequency of that thing. Tapping on a tuning fork makes a single clear note. Tapping on a bridge, say a column of soldiers marching across in step, can destroy the bridge. Two very different examples of harmonic resonance. No way to offer specific corrections. But something to think about? You can't _see_ vibration. (unless it gets bad enough that you can, but that's way too late) But you can feel it. Fingertips and backs of the knuckles. Generally, I'd immediately suspect long slender structures. Especially highly stressed long slender things (like engine pylons?) Start her up and get her buzzing just a litle bit, and just feel her up. Touch all her parts, and in different places. See if you can find what's making her shake, and where she's really excited. (whew!) Anyway... That's where you'll want to stiffen it up... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Car engine FAA certified for airplane use | Cy Galley | Home Built | 10 | February 6th 04 03:03 PM |
Objective Engine Discussion | Rick Maddy | Home Built | 26 | October 14th 03 04:46 AM |
harley engine | Air Methods Corporation | Home Built | 1 | September 21st 03 08:13 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |
Gasflow of VW engine | Veeduber | Home Built | 4 | July 14th 03 08:06 AM |