![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm re-plumbing and re-wiring a Nimbus 2 cockpit and want to know why there are filters in some of the instrument tubing.
There is a filter on the nose mounted pitot tube as well as on the static tube from the tail boom. There was no filter/gust filter on the TE tube, nor on the four nose mounted static ports. Since I'm upgrading all the flow based instruments to pressure transducer based instruments is there any benefit in retaining these filters? They look like the one on the right in this pictu http://www.svsponline.co.uk/user/pro...t%20filter.jpg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm guessing the previous owner intended them to be water traps; if
the nose statics weren't used they wouldn't bother, and in the TE tube (although just as likely to give water ingress as the tail boom statics) might be worried about adding undesirable vario lag. At 10:55 14 April 2016, Surge wrote: I'm re-plumbing and re-wiring a Nimbus 2 cockpit and want to know why there are filters in some of the instrument tubing. There is a filter on the nose mounted pitot tube as well as on the static tube from the tail boom. There was no filter/gust filter on the TE tube, nor on the four nose mounted static ports. Since I'm upgrading all the flow based instruments to pressure transducer based instruments is there any benefit in retaining these filters? They look like the one on the right in this pictu http://www.svsponline.co.uk/user/pro...t%20filter.jpg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 12:27 14 April 2016, Peter Purdie wrote:
I'm guessing the previous owner intended them to be water traps; if the nose statics weren't used they wouldn't bother, and in the TE tube (although just as likely to give water ingress as the tail boom statics) might be worried about adding undesirable vario lag. At 10:55 14 April 2016, Surge wrote: I'm re-plumbing and re-wiring a Nimbus 2 cockpit and want to know why there are filters in some of the instrument tubing. There is a filter on the nose mounted pitot tube as well as on the static tube from the tail boom. There was no filter/gust filter on the TE tube, nor on the four nose mounted static ports. Since I'm upgrading all the flow based instruments to pressure transducer based instruments is there any benefit in retaining these filters? They look like the one on the right in this pictu http://www.svsponline.co.uk/user/pro...t%20filter.jpg I use one of those stuck in the probe hole when de-rigged in order to keep the earwigs from nesting in my pipes. Might have been the same idea? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems to be kind of a best practice to include filters in instrument plumbing, since most gliders I have seen have them installed. I guess the purpose is to protect instrumentation from any kind of contamination, be it water, dust or insects.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PANEL PLUMBING | Travis Beach | Soaring | 3 | December 5th 07 10:00 PM |
PANEL PLUMBING | Travis Beach | Soaring | 0 | December 5th 07 02:16 PM |
PANEL PLUMBING | Travis Beach | Soaring | 0 | December 5th 07 02:16 PM |
Oil Filters | Jon Kraus | Owning | 7 | September 8th 05 12:02 PM |
Plumbing for a CAI 302 + Schuemann B-Box | Mark Grubb | Soaring | 1 | June 12th 04 03:39 PM |