![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are these units reliable and worth having in your glider?
Are they consistent enough to trust in a real threat situation? Nick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 5:54:05 PM UTC-8, Nick Kennedy wrote:
Are these units reliable and worth having in your glider? Are they consistent enough to trust in a real threat situation? Nick It is very reliable BUT has major limitations; It will tell you that there is a possible threat(s), the distance and if it is above or below and the respective number of feet. What it does not indicate is the direction. I find my head turning more vigorously than normal when it goes off which is a good thing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/11/2013 8:54 PM, Nick Kennedy wrote:
Are these units reliable No present collision avoidance technology should be considered "reliable". It's just there as a backup to your MK1 eyeball. and worth having in your glider? I own one, and I consider it "worth having", meaning that it beats having nothing. Since I own it, I don't fly without it. Are they consistent enough to trust in a real threat situation? Again, you should only trust your eyes. The MRX is there to nudge you if your scan misses something. (When you get one, you will be surprised and embarrassed at how unreliable your scan is.) Vaughn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What they both said...
Besides the fact that it alerts you to pick up your scan, you can quickly interpret whether an aircraft might be a threat by observing whether it's closing with you. Just because range or altitude are closing does not mean that it's a threat, but I'm more concerned with a closing aircraft than one that's opening the gap. What nobody has said is that it's a battery hog. A pair of AA batteries may not last for a single flight so I've hooked mine up to ship's power. "Vaughn" wrote in message ... On 12/11/2013 8:54 PM, Nick Kennedy wrote: Are these units reliable No present collision avoidance technology should be considered "reliable". It's just there as a backup to your MK1 eyeball. and worth having in your glider? I own one, and I consider it "worth having", meaning that it beats having nothing. Since I own it, I don't fly without it. Are they consistent enough to trust in a real threat situation? Again, you should only trust your eyes. The MRX is there to nudge you if your scan misses something. (When you get one, you will be surprised and embarrassed at how unreliable your scan is.) Vaughn |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Nick Kennedy wrote: Are these units reliable and worth having in your glider? Are they consistent enough to trust in a real threat situation? Nick Mine seems to be reliable. Seems to pick up relevant traffic. Ignores airliners way up in the flight levels and I have had it ignore aircraft passing at very low altitudes such as powerline patrols. Maybe the software ignores them or they were too low for their transponders to be interrogated. Can be annoying at during the launch at contest sites as the towplanes are continually causing it to bleep. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 6:54:05 PM UTC-7, Nick Kennedy wrote:
Are these units reliable and worth having in your glider? Are they consistent enough to trust in a real threat situation? Nick No! I had to send back my MRX to Zaon 3 times because a "filter" kept going out. The problem was the unit would not tell me there was any problem. It just acted like everything was fine but it would just stop picking up any other aircraft. I knew it was bad when a jet or two would get too close and it didn't pick it up. Very frustrating! Also, please be aware that Zaon is now out of business so when that filter on yours goes out you might not have anywhere to send it to. Here is a link about them going Tango Uniform. http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news...n220938-1.html The best solution is get a PowerFlarm, but then again, I know you don't like to be told what to do... ![]() Bruno - B4 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 5:54:05 PM UTC-8, Nick Kennedy wrote:
Are these units reliable and worth having in your glider? Are they consistent enough to trust in a real threat situation? Nick I have had the same experience as Bruno. The MRX works well when it works, but mine has been back to the manufacturer 3 times for repair, and it's ready for it's fourth repair. This time, there's no manufacturer to send it back to. If I could get it fixed again, I'd do it. Is the unit reliable? No. Russ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:46:17 AM UTC-8, wrote:
Also, please be aware that Zaon is now out of business so when that filter on yours goes out you might not have anywhere to send it to. Here is a link about them going Tango Uniform. http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news...n220938-1.html Does that mean that the only way to get PCAS functionality now is via PowerFlarm? I did a search and it seems that Zaon was the only other company making PCAS (it's their term so I'm wondering if the same capability is available under another name). True? 9B |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 6:54:05 PM UTC-7, Nick Kennedy wrote:
Hi Gents Thanks for the good information on the MRX, I appreciate the time you guys took to write about it. It sounds like when it is working and connected to the ships power it is a good thing to have on board. I got mine in my extra's box of stuff when I purchased glider T and it seems to work at the present. I set it on the dash of my F150 truck looking at the turns from downwind to base to final here in Telluride yesterday at it worked as advertised, and I could read the screen in bright sunlight I like how simple it is to use and how easy it is to interpret the display. To bad they went Tango Uniform as Bruno so delicately put it :] Happy Holidays Nick T Are these units reliable and worth having in your glider? Are they consistent enough to trust in a real threat situation? Nick |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had mine for less than a year and, so far, it has not failed.
As to extremely high or low aircraft alerting - during setup the pilot chooses maximum range and altitude difference to report. "Nick Kennedy" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 6:54:05 PM UTC-7, Nick Kennedy wrote: Hi Gents Thanks for the good information on the MRX, I appreciate the time you guys took to write about it. It sounds like when it is working and connected to the ships power it is a good thing to have on board. I got mine in my extra's box of stuff when I purchased glider T and it seems to work at the present. I set it on the dash of my F150 truck looking at the turns from downwind to base to final here in Telluride yesterday at it worked as advertised, and I could read the screen in bright sunlight I like how simple it is to use and how easy it is to interpret the display. To bad they went Tango Uniform as Bruno so delicately put it :] Happy Holidays Nick T Are these units reliable and worth having in your glider? Are they consistent enough to trust in a real threat situation? Nick |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: PCAS Zaon MRX | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | November 27th 13 10:36 PM |
FS: Zaon MRX PCAS | Ramy | Soaring | 8 | August 8th 13 06:09 AM |
Fs Zaon Pcas Xrx | cessna150 | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 26th 12 06:02 AM |
Warning to users of Zaon PCAS MRX | Bruno[_2_] | Soaring | 23 | February 22nd 10 05:04 PM |
GPS intrference from Zaon PCAS ?? | Carl | Soaring | 9 | May 31st 07 05:12 AM |