![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recent threads that discussed handling and performance have referred
to the aft cg limit, perhaps implying that there is a fixed aft limit. For the ASW-19b and the ASW-28, the gliders I have most recent experience in, the aft cg limit moves forward as the gross weight increases. I assume this is true for other glider types but I don't have data available. For the ASW-28 the manufacturer recommends an optimum cg range of 300-310mm aft of datum but does not seem to mention that the aft limit of this "optimum" range is behind the aft cg limit at max gross weight. I have found that a cg position of 320mm aft of datum gives best climb performance at 9psf loading without compromising the high speed performance. That cg is at the aft limit for 9psf but well forward of the 345mm "dry" aft limit. (9 pounds per square foot is a loading limit for USA standard class contests) The low weight cg range for the 28 is 227-345mm aft of datum for those that want to consider percentages. So how many of you know if the glider you fly has a weight dependent aft cg limit? Andy (GY) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sounds barrier speed limits | Roger Halstead | Piloting | 2 | August 10th 04 02:09 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
Cirrus Airframe Life Limits | Dave | Owning | 16 | April 27th 04 05:58 PM |
Cirrus Airframe Life Limits | Dave | Piloting | 16 | April 27th 04 05:58 PM |