![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the Cessna Pilots Ass'n avionics forum:
"Just talked to Tom Engberg at Cessna about G1000 WAAS upgrade. He said that Cessna was waiting on Garmin to propose an upgrade to the pre 07 G1000s. He also said that it was going to take a change in the GIAs and that would be very expensive. This is if it is even made available. What I couldn't fine believeable is that he said no one at Cessna knew if the upgrade was even going to be made available. I believe that if the present owners of pre 07 G1000s don't start calling Cessna and demanding what their advertisements stated, we will never get a WAAS upgrade." -- Dan ? at BFM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 29, 3:10 pm, "Dan Luke" wrote:
From the Cessna Pilots Ass'n avionics forum: "Just talked to Tom Engberg at Cessna about G1000 WAAS upgrade. He said that Cessna was waiting on Garmin to propose an upgrade to the pre 07 G1000s. He also said that it was going to take a change in the GIAs and that would be very expensive. This is if it is even made available. What I couldn't fine believeable is that he said no one at Cessna knew if the upgrade was even going to be made available. I believe that if the present owners of pre 07 G1000s don't start calling Cessna and demanding what their advertisements stated, we will never get a WAAS upgrade." -- Dan ? at BFM This will be interesting for CAP. We have lots and lots of 2006 G1000 182's and 206's. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote: This will be interesting for CAP. We have lots and lots of 2006 G1000 182's and 206's. Could be really bad. Owners 0f 2004-2006 Cessnas could find the IFR utility of their airplanes diminishing yearly as the FAA commissions more LNAV-VNAV WAAS approaches. Can you say "class action suit?" What about when ADS-B arrives? Will G1000 owners be SOL then, too? -- Dan "The future has actually been here for a while, it's just not readily available to everyone." - some guy at MIT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
... ... Could be really bad. Owners 0f 2004-2006 Cessnas could find the IFR utility of their airplanes diminishing yearly as the FAA commissions more LNAV-VNAV WAAS approaches. Can you say "class action suit?" What about when ADS-B arrives? Will G1000 owners be SOL then, too? ... I can't see the FAA decommissioning VOR / ILS / GPS / RNAV approaches as they bring up new WAAS approaches. I can see that the older G1000s won't be able to take advantage of the new approaches. I also don't see this as a big impact for CAP since very, very little of our flying is done in IMC (except for transport or maybe electronic searches). I think this will become a marketing / legal issue for Cessna however, especially if promises were made. -- Jim Carter Rogers, Arkansas |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" writes: This will be interesting for CAP. We have lots and lots of 2006 G1000 182's and 206's. Could be really bad. Owners 0f 2004-2006 Cessnas could find the IFR utility of their airplanes diminishing yearly as the FAA commissions more LNAV-VNAV WAAS approaches. What the?! Did any fool ever any proclaim a guarantee of "non-diminishing IFR utility"? Even if they did, how exactly do you figure that the mere existence of LNAV-VNAV approaches somehow dimishes the utility of those machines that cannot use them?! If anything, they can be a plus -- there any LNAV-VNAV family approaches that do not also have plain LNAV? Can you say "class action suit?" [...] Yes, and I can also say "bozo the clown". - FChE |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Eigler" wrote: What the?! Did any fool ever any proclaim a guarantee of "non-diminishing IFR utility"? No, but Cessna and Garmin both said that older G1000s would be upgradable. Even if they did, how exactly do you figure that the mere existence of LNAV-VNAV approaches somehow dimishes the utility of those machines that cannot use them?! Think about the fact that the FAA is counting on GPS to allow them to do away with ground based NAV systems--it's already happening. Do you really believe that won't include some ILS's? If anything, they can be a plus -- Haw-haw! there any LNAV-VNAV family approaches that do not also have plain LNAV? Evidently the concept of lower minimums for VNAV is new to you. Can you say "class action suit?" [...] Yes, and I can also say "bozo the clown". Can you do tricks on your tiny bicycle, too? -- Dan "How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!" -Chief Inspector Dreyfus |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote:
What about when ADS-B arrives? Hopefully it'll come with more vendors offering products and price competiton... Right now the offerings are few and the pricing high... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote: Think about the fact that the FAA is counting on GPS to allow them to do away with ground based NAV systems--it's already happening. Do you really believe that won't include some ILS's? So *that's* what you're aching to sue Garmin & Cessna for? The hypothetical decommissioning of ILS approaches by the FAA? Good luck with that. there any LNAV-VNAV family approaches that do not also have plain LNAV? Evidently the concept of lower minimums for VNAV is new to you. Or rather, I can tell the difference between a contrapositive and a non sequitor. - FChE |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Eigler" wrote: Think about the fact that the FAA is counting on GPS to allow them to do away with ground based NAV systems--it's already happening. Do you really believe that won't include some ILS's? So *that's* what you're aching to sue Garmin & Cessna for? The hypothetical decommissioning of ILS approaches by the FAA? Good luck with that. That's quite a little reading comprehension problem you've got there, Bozo. Did you take your Ritalin? there any LNAV-VNAV family approaches that do not also have plain LNAV? Evidently the concept of lower minimums for VNAV is new to you. Or rather, I can tell the difference between a contrapositive and a non sequitor. Debatable. If you were that familiar, you ought at least be able to spell the words. However, judging by your remarks, I'd say you are a natural master of non sequitur, even if you don't realize it when you are doing it. -- Dan "Almost all the matter that came out of the Big Bang was two specific sorts; hydrogen, and stupidity." -Robert Carnegie in talk.origins |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 30, 7:54 am, Darrel Toepfer wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote: What about when ADS-B arrives? Hopefully it'll come with more vendors offering products and price competiton... Right now the offerings are few and the pricing high... Yea, and the FAA seems to be helping avoid competition. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WAAS upgrade for your G1000? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 14 | September 5th 07 05:02 PM |
WAAS upgrade info for Garmin 430 | Paul kgyy | Owning | 23 | January 3rd 07 04:33 PM |
Has anyone got the waas garmin upgrade? | scott moore | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 1st 07 08:38 AM |
More info on GNS 430/530 WAAS upgrade | PPT33R | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | June 24th 05 02:21 PM |
More info on GNS 430/530 WAAS upgrade | PPT33R | Owning | 33 | June 24th 05 02:21 PM |