![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() With all the attention and analysis currently being accorded the Wright Brothers’ accomplishments a century ago, a question comes to mind: Is 100 years a long enough time to develop a balanced historical perspective of this achievement? I would suggest not, if the reviewer attempts a perspective primarily from the present and particularly if he is only examing the aviation-related achievements which have unfolded within the century since. If we could take all of the flight-related dreams throughout mankind’s history and stack them up against what occurred at Kitty Hawk 100 years ago today, only a minute percentage of them would find fulfillment in that event. Why is this so? Because from the earliest of time man dreamed to fly as he saw birds, and insects, and other flying creatures fly- under their own power or through the utilization of naturally occurring energy forms manifested as atmospheric discontinuities. Dreams which centered on the use of machines to produce the power for flight, whether steam, internal combustion, or otherwise, are relative newcomers when weighed against the mass of history. Even a cursory review of the literature will reveal this perspective. As such, I would suggest that when Paul MacCready’s team achieved sustainable, controlled human-powered flight by winning the Kremer Prize in 1977, the seminal flight event in the past century had occurred. Although the flight did not result from the flapping of arms or other devices so typical of long- standing human dreams, all of the elements were present and success was gained. As such, the vast majority of historical flight dreams would have found fulfillment in that event- not the Wrights’ achievement, or landing on the moon, or breaking the sound barrier, or any of the other 20th century flight achievements which are often pointed to as the most spectacular. This is not meant to detract from the Wright brothers’ achievements. Indeed their earlier flights with gliders had already achieved results which make their first powered flight look small by comparison. And it should be noted that their gliding achievements would more closely fit the vast sum of age-old flight dreams by using naturally occurring atmospherics, as the birds and other flying creatures do. Nor is this meant to ignore the legacy the Wrights established as scientists; carefully working toward an important goal through experimentation, trial and error. It is interesting to think about looking forward, and wondering what more time might lend to the historical perspective. I believe that the majority and past perspective, not the present, will again prevail as the more valued flight form. It is the most elemental, the most pure. And, given the reality that the energy forms used in the bulk of powered flight during the century following the Wright event are either unsustainable or ultimately damaging to the world in the long-term, this will likely be reinforced. Just a few thoughts on the subject. Here’s to the Wrights, MacCready, and all pioneers in flight! Best Regards, Gary Osoba |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Article: America Has Grounded the Wright Brothers | Tom Sixkiller | Owning | 66 | January 3rd 04 05:55 PM |
Article: America Has Grounded the Wright Brothers | Tom Sixkiller | Piloting | 71 | January 3rd 04 05:55 PM |
NEXT ON NOVA: "Wright Brothers' Flying Machine" | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | December 13th 03 02:32 AM |
Wright Flyer won't fly! | Trent Moorehead | Piloting | 31 | October 18th 03 04:37 PM |
The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience | John Carrier | Military Aviation | 54 | October 12th 03 04:59 AM |