![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A lousy end to what was a beautiful day of soaring, thanks to the USMC
and my own lack of vigilance. Yesterday a cold front was bearing down on Phoenix. While in other parts of the country this makes for winter worries, here the front is a small band of cumulus and a very slight chance of virga. The higher elevations might see some precipitation. The weather was still great, it was 3 pm and I was climbing in decent lift with another glider at the southern end of the Sierra Estrellas-a 15 mile ridge line southwest of KPHX. I heard it first. The sound was of a jet close by. The visibility in the front seat of the Burkhard Grob G103 is excellent, but I could see nothing. Still the sound, but no airplane. Then, from behind a flight of two Harriers flew directly between both gliders and slightly above heading east. As I was at 5500 MSL, and the floor of the Class B wedge just to the east of my position was 6000 MSL, I would guess that the jets were close to but under 6000. The encounter lasted all of 10-15 seconds. I have no idea if they were IFR, nor if they could, should or did comply with the 200 KIAS speed limit under the shelf of the class B. I also have no idea whether either I or the other glider was seen by the lead. After the encounter, I lost my enthusiasm for the flight along with the thermal and worked my way back to the sailport. When I fly with students in this area, I hammer the idea that our piece of the sky is busy due to the natural and man-created boundaries which will force through traffic to overfly our thermal hunting area. So I received yet another reminder that I cannot see everything even part of the time. Were one of the Harriers and me to collide does anyone think that the TV would have the blame anywhere other than me? Let's be careful out there. I think I am, but again I got another chance. Terry Claussen |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It sounds like a scary 10-15 seconds! I know the feeling: I too have had
close encounters with jets. I've been closer than I would have liked to 737's, F-117's, and a B1-b with its wings fully swept back flying Nap-of-the-Earth. With one 737, I saw its shadow flying directly at mine, but it took several seconds for me to find it. The other 737 was pointed out to me by the Approach controller, but neither of us saw each other. The flight of F-117's I'm sure saw me, for they came up from behind and on my right, and overtook me on a parallel course. They got my heart pounding though! But it was the B1-B about 1,000 feet below flying at nearly the speed of sound that scared the bejeezers out of me! Yes, keep your eyes outside 99% of the time. Feel for the lift, listen to the audio vario, and look outside. Not only does this help keep aluminum off of fiberglass, but it improves your piloting technique as well. A couple of points about the Harriers you encountered though: 1.) They may or may not have been in contact with ATC, and even if they were, there would be no separation requirements between them and you. 2.) Military aircraft do not have the 200 knot limitation under the Class B airspace. 3.) Jet pilots tend not to look outside of the cockpit nearly as much as we do, and even if they did, it would be extremely difficult for them to see us. There was a video made of a near-miss a couple of years ago between an F-16 and a Cessna 172. The footage was from the Heads-Up Display (HUD) of the F-16. They missed by 15 feet, and you had to play the video in slow motion to even see the Cessna. I know those points don't give us a warm and fuzzy feeling, but that's the world we live in. The best advice that I have is to either avoid the areas of high risk, communicate with the controlling agency, or work from within the system to keep the aircraft apart from each other through a Letter of Agreement (LOA). Fly safe, Chris Fleming, 'L9' ATP B-767, CFI-G "Terry Claussen" wrote in message ... I have no idea if they were IFR, nor if they could, should or did comply with the 200 KIAS speed limit under the shelf of the class B. I also have no idea whether either I or the other glider was seen by the lead. After the encounter, I lost my enthusiasm for the flight along with the thermal and worked my way back to the sailport. When I fly with students in this area, I hammer the idea that our piece of the sky is busy due to the natural and man-created boundaries which will force through traffic to overfly our thermal hunting area. So I received yet another reminder that I cannot see everything even part of the time. Were one of the Harriers and me to collide does anyone think that the TV would have the blame anywhere other than me? Let's be careful out there. I think I am, but again I got another chance. Terry Claussen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Terry Claussen" wrote in message ... A lousy end to what was a beautiful day of soaring, thanks to the USMC and my own lack of vigilance. Not sure any reasonable amount of vigilance on your part could be counted on to avoid a high speed jet from nailing you from behind when you're running straight in a glider (or other small GA aircraft). I've seen a couple of fighters pass right close behind another Stemme 1/4 mile ahead of me. Asked if he'd seen them, he of course hadn't. I suspect, or at least hope, as in your case too, that the fighters had us and were just doing an exhuberant buzz job. In any case, not very prudent or responsible of them. I fly with a transponder and that has to be a help. I've got a ProxAlert R5 on order (www.proxalert.com), so if they're squawking, I'll have their altitude, range and squawk code too. If their altitude is the same as mine, with rapidly decreasing range, and I don't have joy on 'em, then like a raptor approached by a power plane, they'll get to watch me do a wingover and rather steep spoiler descent. all the best, -- bumper ZZ (reverse all after @) "Dare to be different . . . circle in sink." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because you were above 5000MSL what was your pressure setting on altimeter,
standard? You mentioned cold front, low pressure? Are you sure about your altitude in standard setting? If fighters were at 6000 on standard setting and also you but because you were using MSL setting just didn't know that? These helps to understand (I hope) why you two were so close to each other and it is good to go through why this could happen. This sounds like I am blaming you, but I don't, as an outsider I am able to see also probably mistakes you have done. Ari |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
... and my own lack of vigilance.
Yeah right, Terry! You might be the most vigilant pilot I've known in my brief soaring (but much longer aviation) career. You were in the back seat five of my first eight flights, two hours and eleven minutes if my logbook is correct, and I learned more in those five flights than I can recount with credibility, including a whole lot about vigilance that hopefully will stick with me. If this can happen to you, it can happen to Captain Safety. A heads-up for all of us. -ted p.s. thanks for the nice tow this afternoon. The two hours and twenty-five minutes aloft is my new personal best, and I couldn't even get it up! (Uh, the landing gear on the Pegasus that is. Everything else was clear blue fine...) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do military aircraft utilize transponder signal based
collision avoidance systems? At 15:18 02 February 2004, Kirk Stant wrote: (Terry Claussen) wrote in message news:... A lousy end to what was a beautiful day of soaring, thanks to the USMC and my own lack of vigilance. Some thoughts on this incident (and comments in subsequent posts): If I hear a powerplane (any kind!) while cruising and don't see him - My response is to IMMEDIATELY throw up a wing and pull a hard S-turn. This does two things: It lets you check behind, where your greatest threat is, and throws a much bigger visual target for the approaching plane to see. And he is close enough to hear, he will probably see you. This works very well for military jets, not so well for airliners and bugsmashers, from personal experience. At the altitudes we usually fly, fighters will usually be transiting at relatively low speed (about 300 knots, perhaps 350). Down low (or high), they will be going a lot faster (450 - 600 knots) but if you are that low you are about to landout! But even at 350 knots, you have time to hear and react to the sound of the approaching fighters (this from personal experience). Note I say 'fighters' - there will almost always be at least two of them, maybe more, so do not stop searching after finding one figher - it's the wingman, not the flight lead, that is most likely to hit you (because his attention is divided between maintaining formation and clearing his flightpath). In the US most fighters will be either in relatively close formation (easy to see both) or spread out 1 to 2 miles line abreast (hard to see both). And it probably isn't the one that is closest to hitting you that you are going to pick up first, since he will be closest to nose-on. The good news is that if either figher sees you, he will warn the other to avoid you. Fighter pilots look out the window a lot, it is actually something they train at all the time. Don't count on that from airline or lightplane pilots, though! Airliners descending to land are a problem, since you absolutely cannot hear them - you have to pick them up (since they will probably not maneuver unless they get really exited!). Of course, they are big and brightly painted, so are a bit easier to see. When cruising, obviously it is most dangerous at the VFR hemispheric altitudes, but at least you should have an idea where the threat is coming from. Finally, in the US our transition altitude is 18000ft, and since most of us use the field elevation to set the altimeter (instead of calling FSS), there is going to be some altimeter discrepancies - so you really can't count on using altitude for close deconfliction. Kirk |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Transition Altitude in the USA is 18,000 ft., his altimeter setting would
have been QNH, or feet above sea level. Chris Fleming "Ari Paija" wrote in message ... Because you were above 5000MSL what was your pressure setting on altimeter, standard? You mentioned cold front, low pressure? Are you sure about your altitude in standard setting? If fighters were at 6000 on standard setting and also you but because you were using MSL setting just didn't know that? These helps to understand (I hope) why you two were so close to each other and it is good to go through why this could happen. This sounds like I am blaming you, but I don't, as an outsider I am able to see also probably mistakes you have done. Ari |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Evans skrev den 2 Feb 2004
15:32:41 GMT: Do military aircraft utilize transponder signal based collision avoidance systems? Yes, and this does not amuse controllers as they have a fast jet blasting upwards at umpteen thousand fpm, setting off all the TCAS bells in the traffic above the sector. ![]() Cheers, Fred |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Indiana National Guard pilot killed in midair collision | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | June 17th 04 08:08 PM |
Aviation Consumer and Collision Avoidance | BHelman | Products | 52 | April 23rd 04 05:35 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
"China blamed in '01 air collision" | Mike Yared | Naval Aviation | 8 | September 15th 03 05:07 PM |
"China blamed in '01 air collision" | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 2 | September 14th 03 06:08 PM |