![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We had two landouts at Seminole yesterday, both in the same field, - a
pasture with cattle and a locked gate. One of the pilots visited a nearby farmhouse, and spoke with the wife of the property owner asking permission to enter and a key. She was very nice and called her son. He agreed to call back on the pilots cell phone. The Sheriff was also called and did not call back. An hour later, with both trailers at the gate, we called the Sheriff again and advised that we intended to cut a link in the chain, and replace it with a padlock when we left, and mail the key to the owner. This would leave his field secure, and there was no damage. The Sheriff's office made it clear they were not giving permission, and the retrieve crew made it clear they were not asking for permission, merely advising the Sheriff of their intentions, citing the approaching sunset and $220,000 of aircraft in a field with cattle. A bolt cutter gave entry, and we commenced derigging, leaving our most charming crew member at the gate. Both the son of the owner and the Sheriff arrived. The son was extremely upset, insisting that charges be laid. The Sheriff, seemingly somewhat reluctantly, fingerprinted both pilots and wrote up a proposal for charges, which he said would be presented to the public attorney to decide whether to proceed. Nothing further has been heard, and we hope / believe nothing further will be heard. My question is: - what is the law governing a landout on private property? What are the rights of the pilot and of the property owner? Where are these rights codified? The Sheriff said if we had done the same thing after he arrived, he would not have laid charges. He did not charge the retrieve crew with breaking and entering or trespassing. What about the crew situation? BTW, all concerned did act as 'ambassadors of the sport', but the son was implacable. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles Petersen wrote:
We had two landouts at Seminole yesterday, both in the same field, - a pasture with cattle and a locked gate. One of the pilots visited a nearby farmhouse, and spoke with the wife of the property owner asking permission to enter and a key. She was very nice and called her son. He agreed to call back on the pilots cell phone. The Sheriff was also called and did not call back. An hour later, with both trailers at the gate, we called the Sheriff again and advised that we intended to cut a link in the chain, and replace it with a padlock when we left, and mail the key to the owner. This would leave his field secure, and there was no damage. The Sheriff's office made it clear they were not giving permission, and the retrieve crew made it clear they were not asking for permission, merely advising the Sheriff of their intentions, citing the approaching sunset and $220,000 of aircraft in a field with cattle. A bolt cutter gave entry, and we commenced derigging, leaving our most charming crew member at the gate. Both the son of the owner and the Sheriff arrived. The son was extremely upset, insisting that charges be laid. The Sheriff, seemingly somewhat reluctantly, fingerprinted both pilots and wrote up a proposal for charges, which he said would be presented to the public attorney to decide whether to proceed. Nothing further has been heard, and we hope / believe nothing further will be heard. My question is: - what is the law governing a landout on private property? What are the rights of the pilot and of the property owner? Where are these rights codified? The Sheriff said if we had done the same thing after he arrived, he would not have laid charges. He did not charge the retrieve crew with breaking and entering or trespassing. What about the crew situation? BTW, all concerned did act as 'ambassadors of the sport', but the son was implacable. I read that if the owner doesn't want to grant access, they are still responsible for the safety of your property on their land (i.e. the gliders). I don't know if this is true everywhere (anywhere?) in the U.S., but unless you land on a lawyers farm, it might be a good thing to bring up to lube the gate lock. "O.K., we'll straighten this out some other time while you take good care of my $75k aircraft that is serving as a salt lick. Sorry about the inconvenience." Cheers, Shawn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier, "Charles Petersen" wrote:
...BTW, all concerned did act as 'ambassadors of the sport', but the son was implacable. In my experience, the most effective things for landouts a * Make it clear that the landing was unintentional, and the field was chosen as a best last resort. Be visibly relieved that their field was available so that you didn't have to crash. * If they are anything but happy to have you there, offer them about $100 in cash per glider in exchange for any "damages" even if you landed in weeds, fallow, pasture, or plowed. That usually cheers them up at least a little. That's worked great for the two ag field retrieves I've worked. If you don't have $100 cash, or couldn't stand to part with it if you did, you probably shouldn't be flying cross-country. * If they demand more, give them contact info for your glider insurance company and explain that the agricultural claims inspectors will have to look into it. They will often just take the hundred bucks rather than mess with the claims paperwork. But if you've landed in a row crop or something like, you can be fairly certain that you _have_ made a dent in their bottom line, and you should be prepared to take financial responsibility for the risks inherent in cross-country soaring. * When they do get really irate, go ahead and call the sheriff or local law. You can't be exactly sure what the officer will do or whose side they're on, but at least you can be relatively certain they'll know that intentionally damaging an aircraft is a federal offense, and they probably won't let anybody get hurt. Other, more experienced, outlanders doubless have additional advice. Thanks, and best regards Bob K. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a farmer and pilot, I work with all the Mifflin contests, and have had
a few dealings with irrate farmers before. Most of them are just jealous, and I hate jealous people. One even had the nerve to tell my father, who we sent along on the retrieve to smoothe over this irrate farmer, that if he can afford to fly that thing, he can afford to pay me 500 to get it out of the field. That is not the point. The point is, if we start setting a precedent of paying to smoothe people over, even if nothing is damaged, then afterwhile we will have no where that any of us can AFFORD to land out. I think it is the right thing to do to pay when something is damaged, but not in a cow pasture!! Nothing can get damaged there. My family owns a farm within the traffic pattern at Mifflin, if enough of you land out there, I will fire up the grill and we can have a cook out. To paraphrase my point here, be ambassadors for the sport, but don't be pushovers. After about 5 minutes with some guy in a field, you should be able to figure out if he belongs to the human race, or is just some SOB trying to milk you for money!! Brian Glick "Bob Kuykendall" wrote in message m... Earlier, "Charles Petersen" wrote: ...BTW, all concerned did act as 'ambassadors of the sport', but the son was implacable. In my experience, the most effective things for landouts a * Make it clear that the landing was unintentional, and the field was chosen as a best last resort. Be visibly relieved that their field was available so that you didn't have to crash. * If they are anything but happy to have you there, offer them about $100 in cash per glider in exchange for any "damages" even if you landed in weeds, fallow, pasture, or plowed. That usually cheers them up at least a little. That's worked great for the two ag field retrieves I've worked. If you don't have $100 cash, or couldn't stand to part with it if you did, you probably shouldn't be flying cross-country. * If they demand more, give them contact info for your glider insurance company and explain that the agricultural claims inspectors will have to look into it. They will often just take the hundred bucks rather than mess with the claims paperwork. But if you've landed in a row crop or something like, you can be fairly certain that you _have_ made a dent in their bottom line, and you should be prepared to take financial responsibility for the risks inherent in cross-country soaring. * When they do get really irate, go ahead and call the sheriff or local law. You can't be exactly sure what the officer will do or whose side they're on, but at least you can be relatively certain they'll know that intentionally damaging an aircraft is a federal offense, and they probably won't let anybody get hurt. Other, more experienced, outlanders doubless have additional advice. Thanks, and best regards Bob K. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Chuck,
Been there, done that. I once had the gate to an oil rig, half disassembled when a company man showed up. I quickly said, "If you'll unlock this gate, I'll be glad to put it back together for you". It doesn't take a rocket scientest to see who's going to win in your situation. It's his property and you are trespassing. A friend and I once started a final glide without sufficient altitude, he went left around a knob and I went right. He didn't come out on the other side. Had no time to worry about him as I had a developing problem of my own. Flew on down this canyon and soon found myself at 80 knots and about 5 feet, over the sagebrush. I knew Air Sailing was close, but I couldn't spot it (can't see to far from 5 feet) Then I spotted a camper and figured it must be located at the airport. Exchanged my 80 knots for about 100 feet and found myself lined up with the cross-wind runway. I'll take luck over skill, any day. What's this got to do with landing in a farmers field? My friend called in to say he had landed in a pasture way up the canyon and would we bring lots of help. We all went up there and found the farmer quite irate. He refused to allow the trailer to come on his property. Made us carry the assembled glider about a mile to the edge of his property. The guy was sending a message to us folks at Air Sailing, "I live up here because I'm a hermit and I don't want any GD gliders on my property". That's his right, we ARE trespassing. The same farmer later held two pilots at gun-point for hours untill the Sheriff showed up. We finally got the message. Bolt cutters? That could be construed as burglary tools (I carry a hack saw, less obvious) Hang in there, It'll be OK, but remember this next time. JJ Sinclair |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have absolutely no legal training, but I landed in a ciruit court
judge's field once. He wasn't happy, but over time we managed to cool off and talk about the particulars. Here's what came out of the conversation: When you land in a field, you are trespassing, and you should conduct yourself as such. The owner, can, in theory, order you off his property. If he forces you to leave your sailplane behind, he becomes liable for its safe keeping. The law is your friend. If things get out of hand, recommend that he call the authorities, or call them yourself. They don't want to do any paperwork unless there is obvious damage. They will usually calm the farmer down and expedite your retrieve. Since you have already done damage to his property (by landing on it), don't exacerbate the situation by causing more. Cutting a gate chain or lock is tantamount to breaking into his place of work. How would you feel if someone knocked down the door to your business, then put up a new one with a note saying the key is in the mail? (I've faced the same dilemma and chosen the path of breaking and entering. Just be clear that there's NO justification for your actions, certainly not from the point of view of the property owner. It is very possible you may expose him to more financial risk by your actions than the value of your $100K glider. You are jeopardizing his income for the sake of your overpriced plastic toy.) Never offer money to placate the farmer. Yes, it is convenient for difusing an otherwise uncomfortable situation, but it sets an undesirable precedent and puts both you and the farmer on questionable legal ground. From your point of view, it is an admission of fault... and who knows what fault the farmer may find after you leave. Don't bring up the subject yourself. Let the farmer ask for money. Inform him that you are insured for any damage you do and you are happy to give him your insurance information. (We discussed whether asking for money constituted running an unauthorized landing strip... I used this notion once to answer such a demand. I then offered my insurance information. It worked. The farmer wasn't happy, but at least he had improved to "politely annoyed" by the time I left. He never followed up with my insurance company.) Reimbursing him for services offered is another matter entirely. If he wants to use a tractor to fetch the glider, or prefers using his 4x4, or wants one of his farmhands to oversee the retrieve, then it is OK to offer a reasonable fee in exchange. Never forget who the uninvited guest is. You've called him away from his work. This has a measurable impact on his business. You may have damaged his land, property, or livestock. You are, in his opinion, a dilettante, serving no valuable function in the world. (If you don't understand why, put yourself in his shoes, and get real.) Swallow the farmer's antipathy with polite patience. After all, you deserve it. And remember what your objective is: to get your glider home in one piece... and hopefully leave an impression that will improve conditions for the next sailplane pilot who lands there. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had the opportunity to visit Seminole for the first time a few weeks ago -
and had a very good time. Ingrid and Knut made me feel very welcome, and it was also a very welcome break from the miserable PA winter. I look forward to returning often. Every gliderport seems to have a few known fields where the owners are unfriendly. Invariably it seems to be the result of the owner having been treated poorly at some time in the past (even if no damage was done, just not respecting the fact that you are a guest on their land and asking permission to do anything is at the very least rude and disrespectful of their ownership rights). During my stay at Seminole, I had the opportunity to meet a number of farmers/landowners :-/ One story that emerged consistently from them is having been treated poorly by the hang-glider crowd (I understand that there is quite a lot of hang-glider activity near Seminole). This ran the gamut from rudeness to minor property damage to broken fences and loose livestock. No one sees a difference between a hang glider and a sailplane. I don't know that this problem reflects the current behavior of the hang-glider crowd - and once the damage is done it doesn't matter. But be aware that you may inherit the sins not only of your sibling but also of your distant cousin when you land out, and need to repair relations you didn't break. Also remember when flying in a new location to get as part of your field check any info on the known problem landowners. -- John Godfrey (QT) SSA State Governor PA Region 3 "Charles Petersen" wrote in message ... We had two landouts at Seminole yesterday, both in the same field, - a pasture with cattle and a locked gate. One of the pilots visited a nearby farmhouse, and spoke with the wife of the property owner asking permission to enter and a key. She was very nice and called her son. He agreed to call back on the pilots cell phone. The Sheriff was also called and did not call back. An hour later, with both trailers at the gate, we called the Sheriff again and advised that we intended to cut a link in the chain, and replace it with a padlock when we left, and mail the key to the owner. This would leave his field secure, and there was no damage. The Sheriff's office made it clear they were not giving permission, and the retrieve crew made it clear they were not asking for permission, merely advising the Sheriff of their intentions, citing the approaching sunset and $220,000 of aircraft in a field with cattle. A bolt cutter gave entry, and we commenced derigging, leaving our most charming crew member at the gate. Both the son of the owner and the Sheriff arrived. The son was extremely upset, insisting that charges be laid. The Sheriff, seemingly somewhat reluctantly, fingerprinted both pilots and wrote up a proposal for charges, which he said would be presented to the public attorney to decide whether to proceed. Nothing further has been heard, and we hope / believe nothing further will be heard. My question is: - what is the law governing a landout on private property? What are the rights of the pilot and of the property owner? Where are these rights codified? The Sheriff said if we had done the same thing after he arrived, he would not have laid charges. He did not charge the retrieve crew with breaking and entering or trespassing. What about the crew situation? BTW, all concerned did act as 'ambassadors of the sport', but the son was implacable. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shawn Curry wrote:
My question is: - what is the law governing a landout on private property? Same as always. Who has more guns. (If you have a radio or cell phone, and can call people to come with guns, this is good too). Bow and arrow can be used in extreme duress... What are the rights of the pilot and of the property owner? Ever see "Deliverance" or "Pulp Fiction"? I'd suggest soaring over Ohio or North Dakota, and not so much over parts of Louisiana or Humboldt County... Any of you pilots who think you can land anywhere you like and have it always turn out fine, boy you must know something I don't...I'm sticken' with known "friendly" landout spots... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been flying something for 34 years. That has included powered,
gliders, ultralights, paragliders and hang gliders. I would say that assigning the blame for problems with landowners solely to the pilot of whatever type of aircraft is involved is inappropriate without knowing the circumstances involved in each case. I have over 50 outlandings in gliders and several hundred in hang gliders. I have been nothing but humble and gracious with landowners but have had a few cases of irrate people no matter what I did or say to calm them down. I have flown at Wallaby (one of the hang glider operations near Seminole) and have visited, but not flown at Seminole. There are jerks in every facet of aviation and in my experience no one group can say that they are better ambassadors than another. By virtue of the lesser performance of hang gliders they land out much more often than sailplanes and that may be one reason that some landowners simply get tired of seeing them especially those on the downwind side of the towing operations. The initial poster did the best he could and I would have probably have done the same. There are just going to be some days that the bear gets you. Casey Lenox KC Phoenix |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With all due respect to those who've already paid, I don't agree with
offering $100 for several reasons: 1) In the context described, it's an admission of liability for whatever damages the owner may decide (now or after you've departed) that you--or the hordes of spectators who run/drive out into the field to see the "glider crash"--have inflicted. 2) It invites a counteroffer/demand: e.g., "Gee, if this rich pilot is offering $100, I can probably get $500 out of him." 3) It guarantees that the NEXT guy to land in your field will be hit with a substantial demand. I've landed out about 100 times over the past 35 years and only had a few sticky situations. I like to think it's because I really try hard to treat the owners like human beings rather than ignorant peasants. Witnessing some of our crowd trying to communicate with local land owners is like watching someone speaking loudly to a blind person on the mistaken assumption that he/she is either deaf or stupid. Be that as it may, I've had my troubles. One bad case was an irascible owner about whom I was warned by the locals just before he drove up in his Cadillac. I went through the whole "I didn't have any choice, I'm just glad your field was here, I touched down between the rows [of 6" high beans] to prevent any damage, my primary concern is keeping spectators out of the field so they won't damage anything [this is a real issue and also resonates well with the owner as it says two things: you know what you're talking about, and you two are on the same side], thank you so much for your hospitality, etc." The owner walked back to the car, reached in for a clipboard, and shoved it at me, demanding that I supply my name, address, etc. Diplomacy wasn't working so I walked over to the cockpit, got my own clipboard and one of my turnpoint cameras and politely but firmly asked the farmer for HIS data, as well, explaining that I obviously hadn't done any damage so far, that my crew and I would de-rig and carry out the pieces to avoid any damage, and (importantly) that I would take photos from all four directions both before and after the glider was moved to establish to my insurance company that there wasn't any damage. Oh, and by the way, I planned to ask these nice fellows standing around us to sign a statement attesting to the lack of damage. I gave him my name, insurance contact, etc., but never heard a word. The only other sticky experience was when I had the misfortune to land in a beautiful hay field in Maryland...precisely one year after the previous GLIDER pilot had landed, driven over the hay to get his glider, and vanished before the farmer could find out who had done the damage. The injured farmer had been waiting one year to vent his anger and extract revenge! It took me almost an hour to talk him down and leave him reasonably mollified. If I could have gotten my hands around the throat of the idiot who'd caused the whole thing a year earlier, I'd have done what the farmer originally wanted to do to him myself. My advice: If you've really damaged the crop, apologize for the situation without admitting or promising too much (yes, it's your fault, but don't encourage the owner to think he's hit the lottery). Give the owner your insurance information and reassure him; that's what insurance is for, it doesn't happen very often, you've never had a claim, etc. And be nice. I can't emphasize this enough. Be nice and just keep talking. Put yourself in this person's shoes and commiserate. And although first impressions count for a lot (i.e., the first person the owner encounters is you), having a crewperson arrive who is equally skilled in conversation (and/or who is an attractive female) also helps. Having a couple of cute kids pop out of the retrieve vehicle and exclaim over the cows helps even more, for yet another reason why you should get your family involved in soaring. ![]() If you haven't damaged anything, be nice but try to avoid bending to extortion demands. I'm not a lawyer but my impression is that if the farmer refuses to let you secure your glider, he assumes liability if anything should occur. Most officers of the law are likely to be helpful in this regard even if they're friendly with the owner. If it starts to get tense, insisting on calling the local police/sheriff often helps cool things down; the irate owner usually doesn't expect the trespasser to call the police. Having said all of this, I'll admit that I have occasionally paid small amounts of cash as we're packing up to leave, mostly in compensation for the tractor that pulled the glider out of the field, etc. But I always ask if I can make a contribution to the owner's church instead of offering him the money directly. I've never had anyone look offended or fail to smile genuinely, shake my hand, and thank me. And I think all of my contributions have found their way into the offering plate on Sunday, making the whole experience a win-win for everyone. These days, offer to take the owner's picture with the glider using your digital camera and email him the photo. If he's a good guy, he will appreciate it. If he's threatening, the mere mention of photographic evidence might encourage him to be more cooperative. ![]() Just my opinion. Every situation is different. Remain calm even if the owner isn't acting rationally. Sometimes the best solution is to just keep smiling, keep soothing, and wait it out. Just because you can afford to fly doesn't give an opportunistic field owner the right to a transfer payment from your wallet to his. And keep thinking about the pilot who's going to land in the same field next year. Try to make sure he gets a nice reception, because it could be me. Chip Bearden * Make it clear that the landing was unintentional, and the field was chosen as a best last resort. Be visibly relieved that their field was available so that you didn't have to crash. * If they are anything but happy to have you there, offer them about $100 in cash per glider in exchange for any "damages" even if you landed in weeds, fallow, pasture, or plowed. That usually cheers them up at least a little. That's worked great for the two ag field retrieves I've worked. If you don't have $100 cash, or couldn't stand to part with it if you did, you probably shouldn't be flying cross-country. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 93 | December 20th 04 02:17 PM |
List Of State laws Concerning Landing On Public Roads? | NW_PILOT | Piloting | 42 | December 14th 04 10:00 PM |
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Owning | 92 | June 26th 04 03:24 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |