![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_X-3_Stiletto
The Douglas X-3 Stiletto was a 1950s United States experimental jet aircraft with a slender fuselage and a long tapered nose, manufactured by the Douglas Aircraft Company. Its primary mission was to investigate the design features of an aircraft suitable for sustained supersonic speeds, which included the first use of titanium in major airframe components. Douglas designed the X-3 with the goal of a maximum speed of approximately 2,000 m.p.h, but it was, however, seriously underpowered for this purpose and could not even exceed Mach 1 in level flight. Although the research aircraft was a disappointment, Lockheed designers used data from the X-3 tests for the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter which used a similar trapezoidal wing design in a successful Mach 2 fighter. The Douglas X-3 Stiletto was the sleekest of the early experimental aircraft, but its research accomplishments were not those originally planned. It was originally intended for advanced Mach 2 turbojet propulsion testing, but it fell largely into the category of configuration explorers, as its performance (due to inadequate engines) never met its original performance goals. The goal of the aircraft was ambitious—it was to take off from the ground under its own power, climb to high altitude, maintain a sustained cruise speed of Mach 2, then land under its own power. The aircraft was also to test the feasibility of low-aspect-ratio wings, and the large-scale use of titanium in aircraft structures. The design of the Douglas X-3 Stiletto is the subject of U.S. Design Patent #172,588 granted on July 13, 1954 to Frank N. Fleming and Harold T. Luskin and assigned to the Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc. The X-3 featured an unusual slender, streamlined shape having a very long, gently-tapered nose and small trapezoidal wings. The aim was to create the thinnest and most slender shape possible in order to achieve low drag at supersonic speeds. The extended nose was to allow for the provision of test equipment while the semi-buried cockpit and windscreen were designed to alleviate the effects of "thermal thicket" conditions. The low aspect ratio, unswept wings were designed for high speed and later the Lockheed design team used data from the X-3 tests for the similar F-104 Starfighter wing design. Due to both engine and airframe problems, the partially completed second aircraft was cancelled, and its components were used for spare parts. Role Experimental Manufacturer Douglas Designer Schuyler Kleinhans, Baily Oswald and Francis Clauser First flight 15 October 1952 Retired 23 May 1956 Status Preserved at National Museum of the United States Air Force Primary users United States Air Force NACA Number built 1 The first X-3 "hop" was made on 15 October 1952, by Douglas test pilot Bill Bridgeman. During a high-speed taxi test, Bridgeman lifted the X-3 off the ground and flew it about 1 mi (1.6 km) before settling back onto the lakebed. The official first flight was made by Bridgeman on 20 October, and lasted about 20 minutes. He made a total of 26 flights (counting the hop) by the end of the Douglas tests in December 1953. These showed that the X-3 was severely under-powered and difficult to control. Its takeoff speed was an unusually high 260 kn (482 km/h). More seriously, the X-3 did not approach its planned top speed. Its first supersonic flight required that the airplane make a 15° dive to reach Mach 1.1. The X-3's fastest flight, made on 28 July 1953, reached Mach 1.208 in a 30° dive. A plan to re-engine the X-3 with rocket motors was considered but eventually dropped. With the completion of the contractor test program in December 1953, the X-3 was delivered to the United States Air Force. The poor performance of the X-3 meant only an abbreviated program would be made, to gain experience with low aspect ratio wings. Lieutenant Colonel Frank Everest and Major Chuck Yeager each made three flights. Although flown by Air Force pilots, these were counted as NACA flights. With the last flight by Yeager in July 1954, NACA made plans for a limited series of research flights with the X-3. The initial flights looked at longitudinal stability and control, wing and tail loads, and pressure distribution. NACA pilot Joseph A. Walker made his pilot checkout flight in the X-3 on 23 August 1954, then conducted eight research flights in September and October. By late October, the research program was expanded to include lateral and directional stability tests. In these tests, the X-3 was abruptly rolled at transonic and supersonic speeds, with the rudder kept centered. Despite its shortcomings, the X-3 was ideal for these tests. The mass of its engines, fuel and structure was concentrated in its long, narrow fuselage, while its wings were short and stubby. As a result, the X-3 was "loaded" along its fuselage, rather than its wings. This was typical of the fighter aircraft then in development or testing. For the X-3, the roll coupling flight was the high point of its history. The aircraft was grounded for nearly a year after the flight, and never again explored its roll stability and control boundaries. Walker made another ten flights between 20 September 1955 and the last on 23 May 1956. The aircraft was subsequently retired to the U.S. Air Force Museum. Although the X-3 never met its intention of providing aerodynamic data in Mach 2 cruise, its short service was of value. It showed the dangers of roll inertia coupling, and provided early flight test data on the phenomenon. Its small, highly loaded unswept wing was used in the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter, and it was one of the first aircraft to use titanium. Finally, the X-3's very high takeoff and landing speeds required improvements in tire technology. Specifications (X-3) General characteristics Crew: 1 Length: 66 ft 9 in (20.35 m) Wingspan: 22 ft 8 in (6.91 m) Height: 12 ft 6 in (3.82 m) Wing area: 166.5 sq ft (15.47 m2) Aspect ratio: 3 Empty weight: 14,345 lb (6,507 kg) Gross weight: 20,800 lb (9,435 kg) Max takeoff weight: 22,400 lb (10,160 kg) Powerplant: 2 × Westinghouse XJ34-WE-17 afterburning turbojets, 3,370 lbf (15.0 kN) thrust each dry, 4,900 lbf (22 kN) with afterburner Performance Maximum speed: 613.5 kn (706 mph; 1,136 km/h) at 20,000 ft (6,100 m) Maximum speed: Mach 0.987 Range: 432 nmi (497 mi; 800 km) Endurance: 1 hour at 512.7 kn (590.0 mph; 949.5 km/h)at 30,000 ft (9,100 m) Service ceiling: 38,000 ft (12,000 m) absolute Rate of climb: 19,000 ft/min (97 m/s) Wing loading: 124.9 lb/sq ft (610 kg/m2) Thrust/weight: 0.4762 lbf/lb (0.004670 kN/kg) * |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stormin' Norman" wrote in message
... On 12 Jun 2018 06:30:08 -0700, Miloch wrote: Although the research aircraft was a disappointment, Lockheed designers used data from the X-3 tests for the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter which used a similar trapezoidal wing design in a successful Mach 2 fighter. A great example of how we learn more from our failures. What, the X-3 or the F-104? https://tinyurl.com/y7h2vuq2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockhe...#Safety_record https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2015/...04-Starfighter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Byker" wrote: "Stormin' Norman" wrote in message ... On 12 Jun 2018 06:30:08 -0700, Miloch wrote: Although the research aircraft was a disappointment, Lockheed designers used data from the X-3 tests for the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter which used a similar trapezoidal wing design in a successful Mach 2 fighter. A great example of how we learn more from our failures. What, the X-3 or the F-104? https://tinyurl.com/y7h2vuq2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockhe...#Safety_record https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2015/...ight-stuff-F-1 04-Starfighter --------------------------------------------------------------------- [Image] The Lockheed F-104 was not a too bad design for what it was conceived High altitude bomber interception. The Spanish Ejercito del Aire that used it in this function was satisfied. But using it as a low-altitude fighter bomber was criminal stupidity for the BundesLuftwaffe. Political reasons have motivated the choice and German pilots paid it with their lives. A very bad joke at the time in Germany was "What is an optimist? A Starfighter pilot who stop smoking so he will not die from cancer". The problems for the Starfighters of BundesLuftwaffe were several : a lot of new pilots with very little flying experience, a lot of new maintenance men without experience of complex fighters, a lack of a sufficient number of older experienced men (no flights between 1945 and 1956) to help the new one, an aircraft with an ejection seat conceived for high altitude flight and totally inadapted to low altitude high speed flight (corrected later). You add that the aircraft was used in a role it was not conceived for, and you understand why the Starfighter was known in Germany as the widow-maker. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Douglas X-3 Stiletto pics 2 [07/11] - Douglas-X-3-Stiletto-cockpit_view.jpg (1/1) | Miloch | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 3rd 17 03:21 PM |
Douglas X-3 Stiletto pics 1 [08/11] - Douglas X-3 Stiletto cockpit.jpg (1/1) | Miloch | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 3rd 17 03:18 PM |
Douglas X-3 Stiletto pics 1 [07/11] - Douglas X-3 Stiletto cockpit 2.jpg (1/1) | Miloch | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 3rd 17 03:18 PM |
Douglas X-3 Stiletto pics 1 [05/11] - Douglas X-3 Stiletto 5 life.jpg (1/1) | Miloch | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 3rd 17 03:18 PM |
Douglas X-3 Stiletto pics 1 [04/11] - Douglas X-3 Stiletto 4 life.jpg (1/1) | Miloch | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 3rd 17 03:18 PM |