![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Orval Fairbairn" wrote:
I hope that the judge throws the book at them! I think it's implied they were not arrested. What law did they violate? If media goes undercover to a used car dealer to show how buyers can get screwed, you'd probably agree with that. If they go undercover to an FBO under circumstances which were obviously suspicious, what's the difference? The targeted auto dealer may be known to be sleazy, but if the FBO had agreed to the charter, what adjective do they deserve? Fred F. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cy Galley" wrote in message news:i1SSc.295339$XM6.210622@attbi_s53...
You might express you outrage to this irresponsible act to I did. Now to sit back and see their spin on the stupidity. Cy Galley Safety Programs Editor EAA Sport Pilot ----- Original Message ----- snip There surely must be some crime they can be charged with. Oddly, I just read a book 'Storming Heaven' by Dale Brown with just this scenario except they end up getting shot down. Harry K |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it's implied they were not arrested. What law did they
violate? "Hauled off in handcuffs" normally implies an arrest. And in post-terrorist America, there will easily be *some* law that can be stretched to fit. If media goes undercover to a used car dealer to show how buyers can get screwed, you'd probably agree with that. If they go undercover to an FBO under circumstances which were obviously suspicious, what's the difference? Because they were in effect a false alarm in a time of public danger. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:18:54 GMT, "Cy Galley"
wrote: Maybe, just maybe they will treat them like any one else trying the same stunt. They had potential weapons and could easily be infiltrators into the stations. They should be held with no bail on federal charges, and taken to court. Let the network defend them and if necessary pay the fines and let the bosses serve the time as accomplices for planning the jobs. I agree with the "throw the book at them". They certainly would were it some student or individual trying to show a weakness in the system. Besides any terrorist could claim they were just trying to expose any weaknesses. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G EddieA95 wrote:
I think it's implied they were not arrested. What law did they violate? "Hauled off in handcuffs" normally implies an arrest. And in post-terrorist America, there will easily be *some* law that can be stretched to fit. If media goes undercover to a used car dealer to show how buyers can get screwed, you'd probably agree with that. If they go undercover to an FBO under circumstances which were obviously suspicious, what's the difference? Because they were in effect a false alarm in a time of public danger. Even if they can't be charged criminally, they at least should bill NBC for the law enforcement costs incurred. And the FBO should sue them for the mental anguish caused to their employees. It had to be just a little nerve wracking trying to stall people that you believed to be armed terrorists. Matt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger Halstead wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:18:54 GMT, "Cy Galley" wrote: Maybe, just maybe they will treat them like any one else trying the same stunt. They had potential weapons and could easily be infiltrators into the stations. They should be held with no bail on federal charges, and taken to court. Let the network defend them and if necessary pay the fines and let the bosses serve the time as accomplices for planning the jobs. I agree with the "throw the book at them". They certainly would were it some student or individual trying to show a weakness in the system. Besides any terrorist could claim they were just trying to expose any weaknesses. Not to mention that dragging them kicking and screaming through the system would accomplish two important things. One, it would probably be picked up by OTHER networks, thereby promoting the reality that the GA industry is watching out for itself, and two, it would annoy NBC. Mark Hickey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine update, good and bad news | nauga | Home Built | 3 | June 25th 04 06:26 PM |
4130 - bad news... | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 28 | May 17th 04 04:08 PM |
Sport Pilot Leaves DOT for OMB, Latest News | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 3 | December 25th 03 02:49 AM |
It's all about the credibility you don't have, ChuckZZZ | Juan.Jimenez | Home Built | 8 | November 4th 03 01:03 PM |
News server problems on just this group | Chris W | Home Built | 9 | August 9th 03 02:32 AM |