North American FJ-3 Fury_01.jpg

First I would like to say that I enjoyed the Fury-Sabre presentation. However, the mis-identified images cry out to be given proper titles. They being rather numerous, I'm listing them he
_05 = F-86 Sabre
_08 = FJ-4 Fury
_10 = F-86
_15 = FJ-4
_22 = FJ-4
_ 25 = FJ-4
_36 = FJ-4
_38 = FJ-1
_39 = F-86
_40 = FJ-4
_42 = FJ-4
_49= FJ-2
_72 = FJ-4
_81 = F-86
_82 = TF-86
_85 = F-86
_89 = FJ-2
_90 = FJ-2
Boy, I hope i got all of them right!

Traitor.

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:37:30 -0700, The 'Brightness' control still
doesn't help wrote:

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:41:26 +0200, DAN wrote:

Stormin' Norman wrote:

It is rewarding to know these posts are scrutinized so thoroughly. I
should have just marked the posts "FJ Fury" instead of including the
"3".

I definitely prefer quality over quantity. Precise and informative descriptions
make the value of historical pictures, for me.

Conversely, vacuuming a site and dumping the results in a Usenet group with no,
wrong, or half-assed descriptions has rather questionable value IMO.

The technical term is "shovelware", anything to attach political .sig
lines to.

There is already plenty false information on the net as it is. "Social networks"
are cesspools full of ignoramus wannabes. In this group we have the good fortune
of having mostly quality posts by well-informed enthusiasts, even experts.
That's what makes abpa so enjoyable.


Your sudden ardor for sending pics to abpa is welcome. Much more so than the
political flamewars, of course.
You could add even more value by selecting well identified pics, even if fewer.