![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, I'm a recent gradute of an A&P school, looking for a career in
aircraft. I'm not into GA but, willing to if something is in the S.E. area of the U.S. Prefer commercial or military manufacturing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You might want to check the reputed career search engine like Monster.com,
Careers.msn.com, etc. You will find something in there. Toks Desalu "disgusted" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm a recent gradute of an A&P school, looking for a career in aircraft. I'm not into GA but, willing to if something is in the S.E. area of the U.S. Prefer commercial or military manufacturing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:32:54 GMT, disgusted
wrotD: Hi, I'm a recent gradute of an A&P school, looking for a career in aircraft. I'm not into GA but, willing to if something is in the S.E. area of the U.S. Prefer commercial or military manufacturing. Check with Gulfstream in Savannah, GA. If you want to learn maintenance, stay away from manufacturing and head to the service center. A few years there and if you learn all you can, you'll be a candidate for a corporate job where the real money is. Good luck. Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A different handle would be nice too.
"disgusted" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm a recent gradute of an A&P school, looking for a career in aircraft. I'm not into GA but, willing to if something is in the S.E. area of the U.S. Prefer commercial or military manufacturing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of all the people who have earned their A&P license, something like
25% have never exercised the privileges of the certificate. That should tell you something. I know several people who graduated approved programs and never got the license. A&P schools are a scam because the only thing you learn is to pass the test-if you are lucky. I think the _only_ way to get the license should be the experience route (but homebuilding and restoring should count.) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the
_only_ way to get the license should be the experience route (but homebuilding and restoring should count.) The problem with that is you don't end up with a good grounding for a career past being somewhat knowledgeable of small aircraft construction. Similarly, four years of college only gives you a license to learn and a good base to grow from. A&P school is no different in that it gets into areas and theory that you'll never get building a small plane. I suggest you choose your school wisely, just like picking any other center of higher education, there are good and bad ones out there. Remember also, even though the FAA mandated syllabus is about little airplanes and theory, the money is in corporate jets. I suggest that you study towards that end. We place well-rounded maintenance technicians with corporate operators all the time at salaries of $65K to well over $100K, but I stress - well-rounded. I can guarantee you that none of them did it all on their own. In the movie "The Graduate" the word was plastics. In aircraft maintenance today it's electronics. Modern jet aircraft are mechanically so reliable, it is all the stuff with wires attached that fails. Learn all the electrical theory you can, it'll pay off in spades. To maintain an aircraft like a Gulfstream your tools are meters, buss readers, and oscilloscopes. The engines get the plugs and filters changed every 600 hours or so and don't come off until the 4000 hour mid-life inspection or 8000 hour overhaul. I can honestly say that in over 30 years in aircraft maintenance, I've never had to build anything and probably driven less than a couple of hundred rivets. In other words, building and maintaining are two different things. Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The U.S. has to be the easiest place in the world to get an aircraft
mechanic's ticket. Here in Canada there are four requirements: Formal training, which normally takes place in a tech school and will take close to two years; Experience, which is 48 months, and up to 24 months of the tech school training may count toward that, but in any case it will take you four years in total; Tasks, which must include at least 70% of the ATA tasks listed for the type of aircraft the license covers; And four written exams, same as in the US, except that in Canada you can't get exam question and answer books: you have to actually know the stuff, and you have no idea what they might ask you. All of the schooling, experience and tasks have to be documented and certified. There are two Maintenance licences, the M1 which covers all non-turbojet, non-transport category aircraft, and the M2 which covers the rest. There's an S (structural) license, and an E (avionics) license, too. Restoration can count but it has to be done under the supervision of a licensed mechanic. Homebuilts don't count: they're airplanes as far as registering, airworthiness, insuring, pilot licensing and air law are concerned, but not for building or maintaining. You gotta want to be a mechanic pretty bad to do it here. Dan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... The U.S. has to be the easiest place in the world to get an aircraft mechanic's ticket. Here in Canada there are four requirements: Formal training, which normally takes place in a tech school and will take close to two years; Experience, which is 48 months, and up to 24 months of the tech school training may count toward that, but in any case it will take you four years in total; Tasks, which must include at least 70% of the ATA tasks listed for the type of aircraft the license covers; And four written exams, same as in the US, except that in Canada you can't get exam question and answer books: you have to actually know the stuff, and you have no idea what they might ask you. All of the schooling, experience and tasks have to be documented and certified. There are two Maintenance licences, the M1 which covers all non-turbojet, non-transport category aircraft, and the M2 which covers the rest. There's an S (structural) license, and an E (avionics) license, too. Restoration can count but it has to be done under the supervision of a licensed mechanic. Homebuilts don't count: they're airplanes as far as registering, airworthiness, insuring, pilot licensing and air law are concerned, but not for building or maintaining. You gotta want to be a mechanic pretty bad to do it here. Dan And yet I've seen Canada-maintained aircraft which were right doggy, if you ask me. One I'm familiar with shouldn't even have been allowed to fly into this country, it was so unairworthy. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And on this side of the border, we've seen some American airplanes
that should have been shot down and scrapped. It all comes down to how seriously the mechanic takes his responsibilities and how much pride he takes in his work. People are people on both sides of the border, mechanics and owners both. High standards are no guarantee of quality, but it helps. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is rumblings in the industry in the US that the FAA is looking
at the training and licensing issues here. I think that in the future, we will look more like Canada and Europe in the way we license Engineers/Technicians. To this point the industry has been very successfully in self regulating and we have had a safe system. The big thing driving the FAA to move is the economics of commercial airlines and repair stations and looking at recent accidents. The ratio of maintenance to pilot caused accidents has trended up drastically and because of the requirements for recurrent training, pilot caused accidents have gone down. The quality of the average airline mechanic has gone down as aircraft complexity has gone up. From my direct experience, I see the same in large repair centers. Having to make repairs to jets I have been involved with over the years, I have been very impressed with our Canadian brothers. On 23 Dec 2004 11:03:15 -0800, wrotD: And on this side of the border, we've seen some American airplanes that should have been shot down and scrapped. It all comes down to how seriously the mechanic takes his responsibilities and how much pride he takes in his work. People are people on both sides of the border, mechanics and owners both. High standards are no guarantee of quality, but it helps. Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Owning | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | General Aviation | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |