![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting that they consider a security breach by the media as more likely
than a plane being stolen and used in an attack TO: All Massachusetts Airports FROM: Arthur G. Allen, Chairman DATE: March 22, 2005 New information from Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration indicate that recently intercepted telephone traffic and other intelligence suggest that there may be an elevated risk for General Aviation Airports and the small aircraft fleet. We at the MAC have asked for your cooperation before on this matter and we are back with a new emphasis. We are now under two threats. First, there is a real attempt to use a stolen aircraft in a terrorist event. Even more likely, as shown on television last week, is an attempt to demonstrate a lack of security by a media outlet. Newspapers and television stations have tried around the country and, on many occasions, have succeeded in compromising General Aviation airport's security measures. If a station is able to broadcast footage showing reporters around aircraft that are not secure, or are able to film from an Aircraft Operating Area (AOA) without being challenged, we have failed. We must be sure that people are challenged if they do not have an ID badge. This is critical. A real incident or a media manufactured incident would not speak well for general aviation security. Please notify user groups and staff as soon as possible to: · Lock all cockpits, remove keys from ignitions and secure aircraft from flight; · Wear ID badge on the entire airport property and (AOA); · Challenge anyone on a ramp (AOA) to show you an authorized ID badge; · Report unauthorized (unbadged) people to airport management or security immediately. (This must be done when in doubt); · If you see a film crew on the airport, ask them who they are and whether they have received permission from the airport manager to film. Ask for ID badges. If they do not produce badges, usher them off the airports and alert the local police.Newspaper reporters are not authorized to breach security by entering the AOA. See a badge or see them out; · Don't allow an unidentified person to pass by you because you think challenging them is someone else's job. If you want to preserve our freedom to fly without additional burdens and restrictions being forced upon us, it is everyone's job to insist in security measures. Don't cause the general aviation industry to be impacted because you were embarrassed to ask someone for a badge or too complacent to lock your aircraft. We are all counting on each other. Please be aware of planned security tests by the Massachusetts State Police and others. They are coming soon to your airport again, (you are now on notice). Call us at the MAC with questions at (617) 973-8881. "Do not assume anything. Lock up and challenge everyone. Please!" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:15:27 GMT, "Steve Foley"
wrote in PZd0e.33768$FB6.23976@trndny09:: Lock up and challenge everyone. Please!" Welcome to the 21st century. :-( |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Foley" wrote in message news:PZd0e.33768$FB6.23976@trndny09... Interesting that they consider a security breach by the media as more likely than a plane being stolen and used in an attack First, way to go Mr. Allen. Who'd have thought a Mass government official would have such a clue. Second, the threat from the media is probably a factor of 1,000,000 greater than that of terorists. Gig |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What a bunch of crap. How much of this "intel" is made up so they
can look like they're doing something. Pathetic..... "Steve Foley" wrote in message news:PZd0e.33768$FB6.23976@trndny09... Interesting that they consider a security breach by the media as more likely than a plane being stolen and used in an attack TO: All Massachusetts Airports FROM: Arthur G. Allen, Chairman DATE: March 22, 2005 New information from Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration indicate that recently intercepted telephone traffic and other intelligence suggest that there may be an elevated risk for General Aviation Airports and the small aircraft fleet. We at the MAC have asked for your cooperation before on this matter and we are back with a new emphasis. We are now under two threats. First, there is a real attempt to use a stolen aircraft in a terrorist event. Even more likely, as shown on television last week, is an attempt to demonstrate a lack of security by a media outlet. Newspapers and television stations have tried around the country and, on many occasions, have succeeded in compromising General Aviation airport's security measures. If a station is able to broadcast footage showing reporters around aircraft that are not secure, or are able to film from an Aircraft Operating Area (AOA) without being challenged, we have failed. We must be sure that people are challenged if they do not have an ID badge. This is critical. A real incident or a media manufactured incident would not speak well for general aviation security. Please notify user groups and staff as soon as possible to: · Lock all cockpits, remove keys from ignitions and secure aircraft from flight; · Wear ID badge on the entire airport property and (AOA); · Challenge anyone on a ramp (AOA) to show you an authorized ID badge; · Report unauthorized (unbadged) people to airport management or security immediately. (This must be done when in doubt); · If you see a film crew on the airport, ask them who they are and whether they have received permission from the airport manager to film. Ask for ID badges. If they do not produce badges, usher them off the airports and alert the local police.Newspaper reporters are not authorized to breach security by entering the AOA. See a badge or see them out; · Don't allow an unidentified person to pass by you because you think challenging them is someone else's job. If you want to preserve our freedom to fly without additional burdens and restrictions being forced upon us, it is everyone's job to insist in security measures. Don't cause the general aviation industry to be impacted because you were embarrassed to ask someone for a badge or too complacent to lock your aircraft. We are all counting on each other. Please be aware of planned security tests by the Massachusetts State Police and others. They are coming soon to your airport again, (you are now on notice). Call us at the MAC with questions at (617) 973-8881. "Do not assume anything. Lock up and challenge everyone. Please!" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wr.giacona@coxDOTnet wrote in message news:%Pe0e.3085$Dz4.1955@okepread01... "Steve Foley" wrote in message news:PZd0e.33768$FB6.23976@trndny09... Interesting that they consider a security breach by the media as more likely than a plane being stolen and used in an attack First, way to go Mr. Allen. Who'd have thought a Mass government official would have such a clue. Second, the threat from the media is probably a factor of 1,000,000 greater than that of terorists. The same media that has been big-time cheerleaders for the terrorists!!! -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wr.giacona@coxDOTnet wrote in message news:%Pe0e.3085$Dz4.1955@okepread01... "Steve Foley" wrote in message news:PZd0e.33768$FB6.23976@trndny09... Interesting that they consider a security breach by the media as more likely than a plane being stolen and used in an attack First, way to go Mr. Allen. Who'd have thought a Mass government official would have such a clue. This is the Massachusetts Aeronautical Commission, which is pretty much 100% aligned with GA since that's all they get to run. Logan Int'l and Hanscom Field are run by the much-larger Massport, which would be indistinguishable from a parody of itself. Of course, Massport would likely agree with MAC's sentiment, since the media are pretty much their only natural predator. Reporters have gotten a lot more Massport officials fired than terrorists have. -cwk. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Forget all that.
Just shoot them. They can identify themselves later. Steve Foley wrote: Please notify user groups and staff as soon as possible to: · Lock all cockpits, remove keys from ignitions and secure aircraft from flight; · Wear ID badge on the entire airport property and (AOA); · Challenge anyone on a ramp (AOA) to show you an authorized ID badge; · Report unauthorized (unbadged) people to airport management or security immediately. (This must be done when in doubt); · If you see a film crew on the airport, ask them who they are and whether they have received permission from the airport manager to film. Ask for ID badges. If they do not produce badges, usher them off the airports and alert the local police.Newspaper reporters are not authorized to breach security by entering the AOA. See a badge or see them out; · Don't allow an unidentified person to pass by you because you think challenging them is someone else's job. If you want to preserve our freedom to fly without additional burdens and restrictions being forced upon us, it is everyone's job to insist in security measures. Don't cause the general aviation industry to be impacted because you were embarrassed to ask someone for a badge or too complacent to lock your aircraft. We are all counting on each other. Please be aware of planned security tests by the Massachusetts State Police and others. They are coming soon to your airport again, (you are now on notice). Call us at the MAC with questions at (617) 973-8881. "Do not assume anything. Lock up and challenge everyone. Please!" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can just see us all walking aound this ol' grass strip, each of us wearing a gov't authorized ID badge, jsut waiting
for some stranger to show up so we can confront them. And if they have a camera, oh boy, look out... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jsmith wrote in message .. .
Forget all that. Just shoot them. They can identify themselves later. Or, once they've been challenged and escorted off the ramp, walk them right back on again and take them flying. More flies with honey etc. TK |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Better yet, call the local newspaper and/or TV station and ask to talk
to whoever does their general news... Offer to buy them breakfast (the honey) and then take them for a short flight... Talk up Gen Av at breakfast (do your homework because some of these "dummies" can ask sharp questions)... Point out that modern airplanes have keys just like cars which means they have to be 'broken into' to be stolen, so why is it the pilots fault that his airplane that might be stolen, but it is not the car owners fault that his car might be stolen...... What we are doing here is promoting attitudes and view points that will influence how they report on aviation in the future - perhaps we can get rid of the old, " ... and NO flight plan was filed." gasp, horror... Point out that any SUV/Pickup/Van can carry many times the load of explosives that a single engine airplane can, and so forth... Also stress that the national airspace is public property just like the parks, sidewalks, streets, highways, lakes, rivers, etc. and that you - and they - have a constitutional right to use these public spaces, so why should the owner of a small airplane be subjected to restrictions that do not apply to cars, boats, trucks, etc.? Also try to make the point that statistically we kill 110 people a day in vehicle crashes, 99.9% of which never make national news, yet let a small airplane slide off a runway and ding a wing, and it's "DETAILS AT 11" and splashed across the front page the next morning... denny |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|