![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been monitoring the board for a few weeks and have found the
exchanges very educational. I'm hoping now that I can get some direct help to a few questions. I'm seriously considering buying my first airplane. My goal was something that had a low cost of ownership, could seat 4, and was or could be easily upgraded to an IFR trainer. I don't intend to use it for long cross country trip, but shorter trips here in the central Alaska area. I seem to have found an aircraft that fits the bill for sale locally. Its a Piper PA-22-150 Tri-Pacer. Looked at it and flew it today. Seems to have been very well maintained by the two owners (they're moving up to a larger aircraft). Only obvious issue is the hightime engine (1900 hours SMOH). Was surprised how differently it flew than the 172 I've been renting. After that long preamble, I'm gong to have an A&P take a look next week and wanted to solicit this group's help in identifying specific questions I need to have answered. I know to ensure all the ADs have been complied with, but what else should I know about the Pacer? Thanks, Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("anon" wrote)
[snip] I seem to have found an aircraft that fits the bill for sale locally. Its a Piper PA-22-150 Tri-Pacer. Looked at it and flew it today. Seems to have been very well maintained by the two owners (they're moving up to a larger aircraft). Only obvious issue is the hightime engine (1900 hours SMOH). Was surprised how differently it flew than the 172 I've been renting. If you've checked various plane pricing publications, did you notice a premium for planes sold in Alaska? If you don't mind, what are they asking for Tri-Pacers in Central Alaska with a hightime engine? BTW, if you're not comfortable talking $$$$$ that's A-OK. Some people are quite happy discussing pre-purchase numbers, others ...not so much :-) Montblack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, there is definitely a premium. Have to rationalize it as saving a
1-way ticket and lodging associated with getting it from the lower-48. The asking price is $19K. Montblack wrote: ("anon" wrote) [snip] I seem to have found an aircraft that fits the bill for sale locally. Its a Piper PA-22-150 Tri-Pacer. Looked at it and flew it today. Seems to have been very well maintained by the two owners (they're moving up to a larger aircraft). Only obvious issue is the hightime engine (1900 hours SMOH). Was surprised how differently it flew than the 172 I've been renting. If you've checked various plane pricing publications, did you notice a premium for planes sold in Alaska? If you don't mind, what are they asking for Tri-Pacers in Central Alaska with a hightime engine? BTW, if you're not comfortable talking $$$$$ that's A-OK. Some people are quite happy discussing pre-purchase numbers, others ...not so much :-) Montblack |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() After that long preamble, I'm gong to have an A&P take a look next week and wanted to solicit this group's help in identifying specific questions I need to have answered. I know to ensure all the ADs have been complied with, but what else should I know about the Pacer? Thanks, Scott Scott, First thing I would check out is the electrics. If you are thinking of loading up with electrical devices then you need to be sure the system can cope. Upgraded electrics include an alternator. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Go to the Short Wing Piper Club's web site and search for information there.
http://www.shortwing.org/mod.php?mod...804&page_id=34 They are a great airplane! There were a few problems with corrosion around the baggage door and other places. How old is the fabric? That question not only concerns the fabric, but the underlying structure. Fabric can last a lifetime, but it's good to be able to look at the structure underneath every so often. If I was in Arizona i wouldn't be too concerned, but in a moist, possibly salty climate it needs more attention. Find an A&P with good tube and fabric experience. The Tripacer is a great airplane for the money. I'd much rather have one than a spam can "C" product. Dave Chris wrote: After that long preamble, I'm gong to have an A&P take a look next week and wanted to solicit this group's help in identifying specific questions I need to have answered. I know to ensure all the ADs have been complied with, but what else should I know about the Pacer? Thanks, Scott Scott, First thing I would check out is the electrics. If you are thinking of loading up with electrical devices then you need to be sure the system can cope. Upgraded electrics include an alternator. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Darrel Toepfer wrote: wrote: The Tripacer is a great airplane for the money. I'd much rather have one than a spam can "C" product. Had both, the 3P (metalized) had better performance, the C products are easier to get in and out of the front seats... The C products cost more and are a newer product... I flew a couple of "Pie Chasers" 40-some years ago. I did not particularly like their flying characteristics -- especially the bungees that interconnect the rudder and ailerons. It made slips feel unnatural and added unnecessary force to the control feel. The short wing and flaps allow some steep approaches, which may at first seem too steep, but you will get used to it. The single (hand) brake handle is another deficiency (IMHO), as you cannot use the brakes for ground maneuvering. It has a fairly cramped cabin but will cruise an honest 130-135 mph, on about 9GPH. The 150 hp O-320 is one of the most robust engines out there -- and -- it is very happy burning mogas. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article , Darrel Toepfer wrote: wrote: The Tripacer is a great airplane for the money. I'd much rather have one than a spam can "C" product. Had both, the 3P (metalized) had better performance, the C products are easier to get in and out of the front seats... The C products cost more and are a newer product... I flew a couple of "Pie Chasers" 40-some years ago. I did not particularly like their flying characteristics -- especially the bungees that interconnect the rudder and ailerons. It made slips feel unnatural and added unnecessary force to the control feel. The short wing and flaps allow some steep approaches, which may at first seem too steep, but you will get used to it. The single (hand) brake handle is another deficiency (IMHO), as you cannot use the brakes for ground maneuvering. It has a fairly cramped cabin but will cruise an honest 130-135 mph, on about 9GPH. The 150 hp O-320 is one of the most robust engines out there -- and -- it is very happy burning mogas. .... (And it has been known to vapor lock on hot summer days when using mogas!) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
john smith wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , Darrel Toepfer wrote: wrote: The Tripacer is a great airplane for the money. I'd much rather have one than a spam can "C" product. Had both, the 3P (metalized) had better performance, the C products are easier to get in and out of the front seats... The C products cost more and are a newer product... I flew a couple of "Pie Chasers" 40-some years ago. I did not particularly like their flying characteristics -- especially the bungees that interconnect the rudder and ailerons. It made slips feel unnatural and added unnecessary force to the control feel. The short wing and flaps allow some steep approaches, which may at first seem too steep, but you will get used to it. The single (hand) brake handle is another deficiency (IMHO), as you cannot use the brakes for ground maneuvering. It has a fairly cramped cabin but will cruise an honest 130-135 mph, on about 9GPH. The 150 hp O-320 is one of the most robust engines out there -- and -- it is very happy burning mogas. ... (And it has been known to vapor lock on hot summer days when using mogas!) Vapor lock isn't an engine problem, but an installation problem! -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article , john smith wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , Darrel Toepfer wrote: wrote: The Tripacer is a great airplane for the money. I'd much rather have one than a spam can "C" product. Had both, the 3P (metalized) had better performance, the C products are easier to get in and out of the front seats... The C products cost more and are a newer product... I flew a couple of "Pie Chasers" 40-some years ago. I did not particularly like their flying characteristics -- especially the bungees that interconnect the rudder and ailerons. It made slips feel unnatural and added unnecessary force to the control feel. The short wing and flaps allow some steep approaches, which may at first seem too steep, but you will get used to it. The single (hand) brake handle is another deficiency (IMHO), as you cannot use the brakes for ground maneuvering. It has a fairly cramped cabin but will cruise an honest 130-135 mph, on about 9GPH. The 150 hp O-320 is one of the most robust engines out there -- and -- it is very happy burning mogas. ... (And it has been known to vapor lock on hot summer days when using mogas!) Vapor lock isn't an engine problem, but an installation problem! I want to thank everyone for the responses. You've definitely given me some things to ponder. I'm going to be talking to a couple of A&Ps this week about taking a look. Plan to do it in two phases, pay for a couple hours of a mechanics time to do a document review and cursory look. If that looks clean and we can settle on a fair price, do a full pre-buy. Scott |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Piper Pacer for sale | GASSITT | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 14th 04 03:20 AM |
Piper Pacer for sale | GASSITT | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 9th 04 01:53 PM |
Piper Pacer for sale | GASSITT | Aviation Marketplace | 4 | December 27th 03 12:42 AM |
Piper Pacer , trade $$ plus plane for R 22 | GASSITT | Rotorcraft | 0 | December 22nd 03 02:35 AM |
FS : 1953 PA22/20 Pacer conversion | John Galban | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 15th 03 09:04 AM |