![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
91.175 and 91.177 are the operative regulations, and they apply in Class G
airspace in the United States. Peter wrote: FAR 91.175 (a) suggests that it is not permitted to carry out a descent in IMC except on an official published IAP. Any views on this? How would it differ if the entire procedure was done in Class G? Peter. -- Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail. E-mail replies to but remove the X and the Y. Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Only official instrument approaches authorised under FAR? | Matt Barrow | Instrument Flight Rules | 32 | August 6th 05 12:25 AM |
| Only official instrument approaches authorised under FAR? | Stan Gosnell | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 4th 05 10:18 AM |
| Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 03:41 AM |
| Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 03:16 PM |
| PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 01:14 PM |