![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Folks - I had another propstrike on my engine.
Last time, my A&P sent it to an engine shop rather than doing the work himself. Experience has show that even if all the shop does is open and inspect, it will cost me $3500. I need to try and get that cost down. Of course, all this will have to be worked out with the shop. Question: Why did my A&P send the engine out? I understand it might have been a workload problem, but arn't A&Ps allowed to inspect an engine after a propstrike? Question: How much work is a shop or mechanic likely to allow me to do under his indirect supervision? Can I do something in front of him, drag the engine home until I reach another milestone then perform that in front of him? Regards, Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm just curious, if the cost of the engine repairs are running you
into the $$$thousands$$ what does a course in engine repair cost and the cost of becoming an A&P? Lou |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, like I said I was curious.
Lou |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure that is quite true. Anybody can do the work as long as an
IA signs it off in the logbook. The reason the mechanic sent it out is probably to have the parts magnafluxed to check for tiny cracks. Not many small shops are equipped for this... Scott Stealth Pilot wrote: you have a certified aeroplane, no? then it must be maintained and certified by licenced personel. dont confuse the freedoms of experimental aircraft ownership with the legal responsibilities that come with certified aircraft. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott - that makes sense, however even the local 'engine shop' (well
respected) sends the crank out for magnafluxing and for zyco(something). like you say however, there are still specialized tools my A&P would probably have to have. - Mike Scott wrote: I'm not sure that is quite true. Anybody can do the work as long as an IA signs it off in the logbook. The reason the mechanic sent it out is probably to have the parts magnafluxed to check for tiny cracks. Not many small shops are equipped for this... Scott Stealth Pilot wrote: you have a certified aeroplane, no? then it must be maintained and certified by licenced personel. dont confuse the freedoms of experimental aircraft ownership with the legal responsibilities that come with certified aircraft. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
I'm not sure that is quite true. Anybody can do the work as long as an IA signs it off in the logbook. Any Powerplant rated mechanic can do any inspection or repair to any aircraft engine and return it to service within the limititations of FAR part 65 and 43 which I've posted below. The only "major" repairs requiring IA approval are structural repairs to the engine, or involve engines with internal geared superchargers or planetary reduction gears. Furthermore, YOU can disassemble, inspect and reassemble the engine yourself as long as a certified Powerplant mechanic "directly" supervises you and signs off the work in the logbook. You can also legally "inspect" the engine by doing a runout of the prop flange, or you can legally blow it off altogether. This is the relevant service bulletin for a prop strike. It is a "mandatory" service bulletin, however it is not mandated by the FAA thru an AD the way the Lycoming prop strike service bulletin is. Aircraft are only required by the FAA to comply with all service bulletins if operated to FAR part 135. http://www.tcmlink.com/pdf2/SB96-11.pdf This response is based on the references I have included and cited herin. Please correct me if I am wrong on any of this information, but only if you can cite references the way I have. On 4/24/2001, a Cessna 210 with a Continental IO 520 suffered a broken crankshaft. Everybody died. The aircraft had suffered a prop strike four years before, and while the propeller was overhauled, no SB-95-11 inspection was performed on the engine, no runout of the prop flange was recorded, no laws were broken, no mechanics were fired. It's entirely up to the owner/operator whether the inspection is performed. From FAR Part 65, section 65.87: Sec. 65.87 Powerplant rating; additional privileges. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a certificated mechanic with a powerplant rating may approve and return to service a powerplant or propeller or any related part or appliance, after he has performed, supervised, or inspected its maintenance or alteration (excluding major repairs and major alterations). In addition, he may perform the 100-hour inspection required by part 91 of this chapter on a powerplant or propeller, or any part thereof, and approve and return it to service. [(b) A certificated mechanic with a powerplant rating can approve and return to service a powerplant or propeller, or any related part or appliance, of an aircraft with a special airworthiness certificate in the light-sport category after performing and inspecting a major repair or major alteration for products that are not produced under an FAA approval, provided the work was performed in accordance with instructions developed by the manufacturer or a person acceptable to the FAA. ] From FAR Part 43 Appendix A: (2) Powerplant major repairs. Repairs of the following parts of an engine and repairs of the following types, are powerplant major repairs: (i) Separation or disassembly of a crankcase or crankshaft of a reciprocating engine equipped with an integral supercharger. (ii) Separation or disassembly of a crankcase or crankshaft of a reciprocating engine equipped with other than spur-type propeller reduction gearing. (iii) Special repairs to structural engine parts by welding, plating, metalizing, or other methods. Scott wrote: I'm not sure that is quite true. Anybody can do the work as long as an IA signs it off in the logbook. The reason the mechanic sent it out is probably to have the parts magnafluxed to check for tiny cracks. Not many small shops are equipped for this... Scott Stealth Pilot wrote: you have a certified aeroplane, no? then it must be maintained and certified by licenced personel. dont confuse the freedoms of experimental aircraft ownership with the legal responsibilities that come with certified aircraft. -- John Kimmel "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." Theodore Roosevelt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Horowitz" wrote in message ... Scott - that makes sense, however even the local 'engine shop' (well respected) sends the crank out for magnafluxing and for zyco(something). like you say however, there are still specialized tools my A&P would probably have to have. - Mike Zyglo may show cracks in aluminum, which is what it's for, while magnaflux is for steel. Sometimes it takes another process like ultrasound or x-ray to show something. Send your engine to a good rebuild shop like Triad in Burlington, NC. There are too many pitfalls trying to do it yourself or having a local do it who's not tooled up. Even breaking an engine in improperly can ruin your cylinders, whereas a reputable shop will break it in for you in a test cell. If a car or motorcycle engine fails you just walk away. If an aircraft engine fails ... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|