![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi guys. I just got checked out in my club's Cutlass for the purpose of getting started on my commercial rating. In that vein, I haven't done any instrument work in the AC yet -- working on the commercial rating is an interesting opportunity toget out of the mental world of instrument flying and revisit those not-so-polished basic stick skills! But this is an instrument question... I'm going to go up today to do some approaches for instrument currency and figured I'd do it in the Cutlass to get a feel for that plane. Does anyone have a crib sheet for the various "gaits" of the 172RG. By gaits I mean the various MP/RPM/configuration settings (and their associated airspeeds) that you use in different regimes of flight; cruise, cruise climb/descent, holding, approach outside the OM, inside the OM, etc. I have a rought sense for what these numbers are, but I have to admit that I don't quite fly by the numbers the same way VFR as I prefer to IFR. Soon I'll ask my instructor for some instrument practice in this AC, but it'll be nice if I have some framework of power settings before I do so. thanks, -- dave j -- jacobowitz73 --at-- yahoo --dot-- com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The numbers" will stick with you better if you do the testing yourself, in
the airplane you will be using. Make a grid with manifold pressure, RPM, pitch (in bar widths), airspeed, and VSI across the top with climb, cruise, cruise descent, approach, approach descent, and non-precision approach descent along the side. The key metric is airspeed, of course, followed by VSI for climbs/descents...the other numbers are the tools you use to derive those metrics. Shouldn't take more than 15 minutes. Bob Gardner wrote in message oups.com... Hi guys. I just got checked out in my club's Cutlass for the purpose of getting started on my commercial rating. In that vein, I haven't done any instrument work in the AC yet -- working on the commercial rating is an interesting opportunity toget out of the mental world of instrument flying and revisit those not-so-polished basic stick skills! But this is an instrument question... I'm going to go up today to do some approaches for instrument currency and figured I'd do it in the Cutlass to get a feel for that plane. Does anyone have a crib sheet for the various "gaits" of the 172RG. By gaits I mean the various MP/RPM/configuration settings (and their associated airspeeds) that you use in different regimes of flight; cruise, cruise climb/descent, holding, approach outside the OM, inside the OM, etc. I have a rought sense for what these numbers are, but I have to admit that I don't quite fly by the numbers the same way VFR as I prefer to IFR. Soon I'll ask my instructor for some instrument practice in this AC, but it'll be nice if I have some framework of power settings before I do so. thanks, -- dave j -- jacobowitz73 --at-- yahoo --dot-- com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, this is what I have done in the past; generate the list myself as
an exercise. Maybe it's not a bad exercise to do in any aircraft. -- dave j |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Does anyone have a crib sheet for the various "gaits" of the 172RG. By gaits I mean the various MP/RPM/configuration settings (and their associated airspeeds) that you use in different regimes of flight; cruise, cruise climb/descent, holding, approach outside the OM, inside the OM, etc. o Climb: Cowl flaps open. Full throttle throughout climb, reduce RPM to 2500 at 1,000' AGL. o Cruise: 25" MAP or full throttle, 2500 RPM, mixture lean of peak if possible. Keep cowl flaps open in any but very cold weather; top of Cessna CHT green is way too hot. o Cruise descent: 18" or 20" MAP (depending on how smooth the air is), pitch for 500 FPM. Cowl flaps closed. o Holding: 18" MAP, gear & flaps up. o Initial instr. approach segments: 20" MAP, 2500 RPM. o Final instr. approach segment (slow): Mixture rich, 17" MAP (no wind), prop in fine pitch, gear down, 1/3 flaps. o Final instr. approach segment (fast) Mixture rich, 19" MAP (no wind), prop in fine pitch, no gear or flaps until 1/4 mile final, then extend gear (don't forget!) and 1/3 flaps simultaneously, then rest of flaps below IAS white arc. o Landing: -Mixture rich, 17" MAP, prop in fine pitch, 1/3 flaps & gear down at midfield downwind. -15" MAP abeam touchdown. -2/3 flaps, 80 KIAS on base leg. -Full flaps, 70 KIAS on final. -Throttle idle, 65 KIAS over the numbers. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks, this helps! I'll try these out and then fine tune as appropriate for my club's plane. Interesting notes about temps and cowl flaps. As it turns out, I didn't get to do my approaches yesterday in the Cutlass because it's in the shop. Everyone has been noting how the oil temp has been at the very high end of the green most of the time, and the pane pretty much needs to be flown with the cowl flaps open, and they finally decided to do something about it. Of course, I don't know what "something" is if this airplane is just known to run hot. So far they've changed the oil cooler and now have decided to change the oil temp sensor, but no change. The CHT, by the way, seems to stay quite comfortably in the green. thanks, dave j Dan Luke wrote: wrote: Does anyone have a crib sheet for the various "gaits" of the 172RG. By gaits I mean the various MP/RPM/configuration settings (and their associated airspeeds) that you use in different regimes of flight; cruise, cruise climb/descent, holding, approach outside the OM, inside the OM, etc. o Climb: Cowl flaps open. Full throttle throughout climb, reduce RPM to 2500 at 1,000' AGL. o Cruise: 25" MAP or full throttle, 2500 RPM, mixture lean of peak if possible. Keep cowl flaps open in any but very cold weather; top of Cessna CHT green is way too hot. o Cruise descent: 18" or 20" MAP (depending on how smooth the air is), pitch for 500 FPM. Cowl flaps closed. o Holding: 18" MAP, gear & flaps up. o Initial instr. approach segments: 20" MAP, 2500 RPM. o Final instr. approach segment (slow): Mixture rich, 17" MAP (no wind), prop in fine pitch, gear down, 1/3 flaps. o Final instr. approach segment (fast) Mixture rich, 19" MAP (no wind), prop in fine pitch, no gear or flaps until 1/4 mile final, then extend gear (don't forget!) and 1/3 flaps simultaneously, then rest of flaps below IAS white arc. o Landing: -Mixture rich, 17" MAP, prop in fine pitch, 1/3 flaps & gear down at midfield downwind. -15" MAP abeam touchdown. -2/3 flaps, 80 KIAS on base leg. -Full flaps, 70 KIAS on final. -Throttle idle, 65 KIAS over the numbers. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting notes about temps and cowl flaps. As it turns out, I didn't
get to do my approaches yesterday in the Cutlass because it's in the shop. Everyone has been noting how the oil temp has been at the very high end of the green most of the time, and the pane pretty much needs to be flown with the cowl flaps open, and they finally decided to do something about it. Of course, I don't know what "something" is if this airplane is just known to run hot. I fly a cutlass in California with a similar problem. The top of the green is 50 degrees cooler than actual redline temperature (it was sent out for calibration). However, since the =only= marking on the gauge is the green arc, knowing this doesn't help. So, I keep the cowl flaps trailing open to stay in the green, which is the only way to know you're ok. Jose -- Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe, except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Interesting notes about temps and cowl flaps. As it turns out, I didn't get to do my approaches yesterday in the Cutlass because it's in the shop. Everyone has been noting how the oil temp has been at the very high end of the green most of the time, and the pane pretty much needs to be flown with the cowl flaps open, and they finally decided to do something about it. Of course, I don't know what "something" is if this airplane is just known to run hot. So far they've changed the oil cooler and now have decided to change the oil temp sensor, but no change. They need to be concentrating on the baffles and baffle seals. Even a small leak can make a big difference in cooling eficiency. I've spent considerable effort making sure the baffle seals are perfect, trying to get the CHT's to stay below 380 in cruise (I have a JPI engine monitor) with the cowl flaps closed. That helped, but I still can't close the cowl flaps all the way unless the OAT is well below standard. The CHT, by the way, seems to stay quite comfortably in the green. Yes, but the trouble is Cessna's idea of what's an ok CHT is considerably higher than Lycoming's. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This is all very interesting, but slightly disturbing. Everyone's flying around with their cowl flaps wide open? I guess that only costs a couple of knots, but, it's just kind of disappointing that you can't use them the way they're supposed to work. Well, I guess you can close them you reduce power to descend but still keep the engine warm. Anyhow, I have read that making sure the baffling is healthy is really important, as the baffling was designed to direct airflow around the engine in very specific ways, and "more open" is not necessarily better. I'll suggest they look at the baffles, but it's a club airplane and a somewhat single-minded mechanic, so I may just be told to butt out. -- dave j Part 91 wrote: wrote: Interesting notes about temps and cowl flaps. As it turns out, I didn't get to do my approaches yesterday in the Cutlass because it's in the shop. Everyone has been noting how the oil temp has been at the very high end of the green most of the time, and the pane pretty much needs to be flown with the cowl flaps open, and they finally decided to do something about it. Of course, I don't know what "something" is if this airplane is just known to run hot. So far they've changed the oil cooler and now have decided to change the oil temp sensor, but no change. They need to be concentrating on the baffles and baffle seals. Even a small leak can make a big difference in cooling eficiency. I've spent considerable effort making sure the baffle seals are perfect, trying to get the CHT's to stay below 380 in cruise (I have a JPI engine monitor) with the cowl flaps closed. That helped, but I still can't close the cowl flaps all the way unless the OAT is well below standard. The CHT, by the way, seems to stay quite comfortably in the green. Yes, but the trouble is Cessna's idea of what's an ok CHT is considerably higher than Lycoming's. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave,
Hi guys. I just got checked out in my club's Cutlass for the purpose of getting started on my commercial rating. In that vein, I haven't done any instrument work in the AC yet -- working on the commercial rating is an interesting opportunity toget out of the mental world of instrument flying and revisit those not-so-polished basic stick skills! But this is an instrument question... I'm going to go up today to do some approaches for instrument currency and figured I'd do it in the Cutlass to get a feel for that plane. Does anyone have a crib sheet for the various "gaits" of the 172RG. As a CFI, if I were to checkout someone who holds an IR in an airplane, I would ensure we get in some approaches and other IFR work. Hilton |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() That basically makes sense, and I don't think I'd fly into IMC in this AC without having done some instrument work with an instructor. However, adding work that starts to feel IPCish to a checkout seems a tad unfair. As it was, my RG checkout (also my first complex checkout) took 7 hours with the chief pilot of my club, a very experienced and, apparently, particular pilot. I was starting to think this was excessive was getting ready to ask him just how much longer he thought this would take when he signed me off. Maybe that time is normal, I don't know. (I already had been flying the 182, so the only new system was the gear.) I do know that we did a lot of basic piloting stuff; a lot of takeoffs and landings. He likes a good stall landing with the nose well in the air; something I hadn't been doing. As I mentioned, I'm working on my comm with this guy, so I think we'll get around to doing some IFR stuff sooner or later, but his priority was to get me in the air on my own so I could practice the commercial maneuvers on my own between lessons. -- dave j As a CFI, if I were to checkout someone who holds an IR in an airplane, I would ensure we get in some approaches and other IFR work. Hilton |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|