![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was having a chat with an FBO flight instructor yesterday about a
potential student of his who is 6' 4" and pushing 300lbs. As an independent instructor and big guy myself, he was soliciting my opinion on what which training aircraft might be appropriate for this student. I mentioned that a 172 should work provided W&B calculations be conducted to ensure the aircraft CG isn't too far forward. Then the instructor mentioned something I'd never heard befo "No, that won't work. The limit of the Pilot and Co Pilot seats is 400lbs." "Huh?" I replied. "Yeah, its a limitation." He reasoned as he showed me the POH W&B graph. The line to calculate moment stops at 400lbs. His argument was that Cessna deliberately stops the line at 400, because that is a limit. He stated that it was FBO policy to abide by this "limitation." I responded that "Limits" are in the Limitations section, Chapter 2. There *is* a limitation in the baggage sections, but no such limit in the pilot seats. If Cessna wanted to institute a pilot station limitation, they would have explicitly stated it in Chapter 2. I further suggested that if he didn't want to take my word, he could contact Cessna. I've never heard this before. Has anyone else? Otherwise, I've broken the rules on nearly every flight with a passenger or student more than 140lbs ![]() Brad |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brad Zeigler" wrote in message "Yeah, its a limitation." He reasoned as he showed me the POH W&B graph. The line to calculate moment stops at 400lbs. I've never heard this before. Has anyone else? Otherwise, I've broken the rules on nearly every flight with a passenger or student more than 140lbs ![]() Yes, we had to live with this when I was instructing in the seventies. As explained to me, the source limitation is the structural capacity of the floor structure when subjected to max certificated g loading. But you are right in that it is mentioned nowhere in the text of the limitations section. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hate to disagree without documentation, but I have talked to an engineer
at Cessna who says that the fact that the line ends at 400 pounds is not a limitation. For seat strength, he referred me to a National Bureau of Standards website which, after a number of side trips, ends up with a request that the inquirer pony up some bucks to get the publications involved. Bob Gardner "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Brad Zeigler" wrote in message "Yeah, its a limitation." He reasoned as he showed me the POH W&B graph. The line to calculate moment stops at 400lbs. I've never heard this before. Has anyone else? Otherwise, I've broken the rules on nearly every flight with a passenger or student more than 140lbs ![]() Yes, we had to live with this when I was instructing in the seventies. As explained to me, the source limitation is the structural capacity of the floor structure when subjected to max certificated g loading. But you are right in that it is mentioned nowhere in the text of the limitations section. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Front articulating seats for Piper Archer II - Supplier needed | Roy Page | Owning | 5 | June 19th 11 03:15 AM |
Looking for a good set of front seats for a Cherokee 180???? | Chuck | Owning | 2 | January 6th 05 07:12 AM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | December 7th 03 08:20 PM |
FS: Sheepskin covers for Cherokee front seats | Jay Honeck | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 4th 03 03:38 AM |