![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To finish an earlier thread I'm reporting on the install of a replacement
CHT probe in our Aztec. For those who didn't read the previous edition, the left engine CHT probe in our Aztec failed and I started searching for a replacement for the old AC Spark Plug Co. probe. A couple parts houses and an instrument repair company took turn explaining my options. Since the gauge is also an AC gauge and AC doesn't make either any more, the replacement probe will not work with the AC gauge unless the gauge is removed and sent to an instrument repair company to be re-calibrated for the replacement Rochester probe. This problem surfaced in the late 1970's for owners of early model Bonanzas, Pipers, and Rockwell Commanders. One enterprising Bonanza owner experimented with different size resistors wired inline with the probe. He discovered that an 82ohm resistor in combination with the Rochester probe would produce accurate readings on the AC gauge. So after talking with an instrument tech who was familiar with the combination and who had sold many of them during the past 10 years, I thought I'd give it a shot. Long story short, it works. I found a pack of 25 new 82ohm 2W 5% flame proof ceramic resistors on ebay for less than $5 and Aircraft Spruce had the Rochester probe for $54. I figured that even if the combination didn't work, I still needed the probe and would give it a chance before I spent several hours with my upper body crammed up behind our panel pulling the 6 pack gauge cluster. Tonight I installed the probe and attached the wire. I had already wired the resistor and protected it with heat shrink. After installing, I checked the amperage draw on battery power only and it measured 94.3mA, compared to 1.05mA without the probe attached. So I knew the probe was drawing current. Taxi, runup, and test flight showed that the left gauge matched the right gauge almost exactly. I didn't have the time or the equipment with me to check it in an oil bath, but for now it looks like it works as advertised. Jim Burns |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Taxi, runup, and test flight showed that the left gauge matched the right
gauge almost exactly. I didn't have the time or the equipment with me to check it in an oil bath, but for now it looks like it works as advertised. Ingenious solution, Jim. Is one of your partners an A&P? You guys sure seem to find innovative solutions to things! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In years to come, it's going to take a huge collecive knowledge base to
keep our old birds in the air. Imagine trying to do it without the internet. When we bought our Warrior in '98, I was just starting to explore the aviation newsgroups. Because I was so ignorant -- and there was literally no way to get the knowledge-base necessary to own an airplane, other than the "school of hard knocks" -- I was fleeced by an unscrupulous FBO to the tune of $5K for an annual. Had I known then what I've learned here (and in other places on the internet), I could have easily cut that bill in half. IMHO, rec.aviation should be required reading for 12 months prior to purchasing your first plane. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is one of your partners an A&P?
Oh sure... you're just trying to open me up for the ole' Holiday Inn Express routine huh? ![]() We've got several good friends that are A&P's, so anything we dream up gets run through them. Credit for this one goes to a fellow in the American Bonanza Society over 20 years ago, and for a parts guy in TX that I use who had this little tidbit stuck away in some back corner of his brain AND remembered another TX instrument house that actually sold the parts. All done on the internet via email, ebay, and Aircraft Spruce. In years to come, it's going to take a huge collecive knowledge base to keep our old birds in the air. Imagine trying to do it without the internet. Jim |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was fleeced by an unscrupulous FBO to the
tune of $5K for an annual. Had I known then what I've learned here (and in other places on the internet), I could have easily cut that bill in half. Ohhhh you just hit a sore spot. Although it all worked in our favor, I still feel terrible about how the previous owner of our plane was treated. He was nice enough to give us the invoices for the past 4 annual inspection and maintenance. IMHO, rec.aviation should be required reading for 12 months prior to purchasing your first plane. Ditto!! Previous owners annuals on our Aztec: 2001 = $46972.48 includes one rebuilt engine for $14173.50 after core charge refund. Also includes full set of 3 WRONG size tired and $400 to install them Also includes $1500 annual inspection fee, and this is strictly for the inspection per Jim Weir style, no maintenance or repair work, wait, it's worse than that! There is a separate entry and labor charge for each AD compliance, several are strictly visual inspection AD's, but there is actually a line item labor entry for each AD verification and compliance! You would think that if only a visual inspection were necessary to comply with the AD, $1500 would cover it! 2002 = $18694.33 2 cylinders replaced on left engine balance labor and small parts 2003 = $9933.99 New exhaust both engines 2004 = $6562.49 1 cylinder repaired Each year, 3 years in a row they replaced a little rubber cabin door stop on the right nacelle, $40 per pop. First time it blew away on ours, I replaced it, drilled 2 holes in it, counter sunk them and bolted the ******* on then siliconed the holes over. It will never come off again and there will never be another shop screw the planes owner out of $40 for a 2 inch piece of rubber. 2005 = $2441.00 Myself and my partners took most of a week off from work and did anything and everything we could. Includes all A&P/I labor, including to install new windshield. No major problems found. Jim |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Previous owners annuals on our Aztec:
2001 = $46972.48 2002 = $18694.33 2003 = $9933.99 2004 = $6562.49 Holy cow, Jim! You can buy a whole Aztec for that amount! Man, I'm glad I don't own an older twin.... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The previous owner simply turned it over to the shop and gave them
carte-blanche. The invoices tell the tale. They took advantage of him pretty bad. But as a result, we've got an old airplane with an enormous amount of new parts. I don't have a problem with an owner wanting everything done that needs to be done, but the invoices show that there wasn't very much owner consultation, input, or assistance. Jim "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:%GXTe.93333$084.58400@attbi_s22... Previous owners annuals on our Aztec: 2001 = $46972.48 2002 = $18694.33 2003 = $9933.99 2004 = $6562.49 Holy cow, Jim! You can buy a whole Aztec for that amount! Man, I'm glad I don't own an older twin.... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMHO, rec.aviation should be required reading for 12 months prior to
purchasing your first plane. I read it for 3 years prior to buying my Warrior and still got fleeced for 8 grand at the first annual. So reading is good but sometimes you still take a few hard knocks. --Rick |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read it too, for several years, before purchasing our Mooney and still
had a $8,500.00 first annual. Jon Kraus '79 Mooney 201 4443H @ TYQ Rick Beebe wrote: IMHO, rec.aviation should be required reading for 12 months prior to purchasing your first plane. I read it for 3 years prior to buying my Warrior and still got fleeced for 8 grand at the first annual. So reading is good but sometimes you still take a few hard knocks. --Rick |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T.E. Probe Question | KP | Soaring | 2 | July 27th 05 02:58 PM |
Desktop Wallpaper - "An F/A-18A on final approach". | T. & D. Gregor, Sr. | Simulators | 0 | March 1st 05 05:29 PM |
Follow-up probe ordered into June 'friendly-fire' hit | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 3rd 04 03:46 AM |
Cleaning a 3-way TE probe | Jack Glendening | Soaring | 37 | November 5th 03 06:45 PM |
Broken line to Oil Temperature Probe, Repairable? | rkane33 | Owning | 2 | July 25th 03 03:19 AM |