![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Beckman" wrote in message news:8_h_e.287791$E95.24405@fed1read01... From MSNBC.com... http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9503338/ I'm betting that pretty much anything is hackable... by somebody..., and if not today, then tomorrow, and if not tomorrow, then next week, month, or year. And it depends a little on your definition of "hacking". Some hacks are easier than others, I would think. Is it: Looking? Destroying? Modifying? Denying access? Slowing access and/or operation? Any of the above for the operation (the programs, the "executable"). Then repeat all of the above again, for the data, and repeat once more for the hardware and infrastructure. There are probably very few systems in the world about which you could not say that they "lack important controls". It may mean a little as finding an entry-level programmer's password easy to crack. Or it could mean that the door to the computer room didn't lock properly once. Or...it could mean that a teenager in GoHackStan can shut down the whole system with nothing more than a dialup modem and a 1982 Commodore. It could also mean that a legitimate employee takes copies of the source code home on the bus. Not that long ago we exalted such people because they were "dedicated". Today we revile them because they are security risks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Jay Beckman wrote: From MSNBC.com... http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9503338/ It would be interesting to know which OS the article claims to be running on. According to http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7066 , the FAA started to use Linux to run ARTS, in spring 2003. I don't think this would be susceptable to the common M$ Windows cracker. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDOcYtyBkZmuMZ8L8RAtf7AKDCkwKuhAGE9run/ArO2MoPig1OrgCfTSOQ OxJLHUh0JkXcHCl6lDf40Hc= =lEWR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:42:39 +0000, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jay Beckman wrote: From MSNBC.com... http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9503338/ It would be interesting to know which OS the article claims to be running on. According to http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7066 , the FAA started to use Linux to run ARTS, in spring 2003. I don't think this would be susceptable to the common M$ Windows cracker. Regardless of what OS they run, anything is hackable...save only for a computer turned off AND unplugged. Most people don't realize but the greatest threat to any computer's security comes from within. And, this is where security is almost always the most lax. Granted, Linux offers many advantages but being "hacker proof" is not one of them. Greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICSEng'05] Final CFP - due date March 10, 2005 | Utthaman | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 5th 05 09:07 AM |
Int. Conf. on Systems Engineering'05 - August 16-18, 2005 | avinash | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 10:13 PM |
RAAF F/A-18 Hornet Targetting Systems Upgrade | Thommo | Military Aviation | 19 | July 20th 04 09:45 PM |
RAATECH FUEL SYSTEMS SEMINAR JULY 10TH - MIDLAND, Ontario, Canada | Robert Schieck | Home Built | 0 | June 30th 04 08:28 PM |
PIREP - Reiff Preheat Systems | Joe Young | Owning | 19 | December 14th 03 06:38 PM |