A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

when did THIS happen in aviation?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 25th 05, 12:59 AM
Retro Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default when did THIS happen in aviation?

how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter
identifiers?

also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to 1000
feet?

and, no, I was not doing time in prison for the past 20 years for
trafficking.



  #2  
Old September 25th 05, 03:49 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Retro Pilot wrote:
how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter
identifiers?


I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean an identifier like KABE, where
the "K" indicates a U.S. airport, I first saw that in 1989, and it had been that
way for many years. I haven't seen four-letter Ids in the States where the first
letter wasn't "K."

also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to 1000
feet?


IIRC, sometime last year, but it could've been a bit earlier. The new collision
avoidance systems make closer separation standards possible.

George Patterson
Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to
use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks.
  #3  
Old September 25th 05, 04:17 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "Retro Pilot" said:
how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter
identifiers?


You're confusing two types of identifiers. FAA identifiers are three
letters or letters and numbers. ICAO identifiers are four letters long,
the first letter identifies a region, and they don't allow numbers. The
continental US is the region with the identifier "K". By convention,
those airports in the continental US with ICAO identifiers just use their
FAA id with a K put on the front for their ICAO id. Most of the world
uses a more complicated system with the second letter designating a
sub-region. Hawaii, Alaska, the US Virgin Islands and other places use
"P" and a second code letter, and then the mapping between the FAA id and
the ICAO id is more complicated.

US pilots became more aware of the ICAO identifiers when the US started
using METAR and TAF weather reporting formats, the same as the rest of the
world. That happened about 10 years ago. We had to change the FAA id of
several airports to elminate numbers so that they could be given ICAO ids.
Also, GPSes use the ICAO id rather than the FAA id when the airport has an
ICAO id, just to reduce confusion between airport ids and co-located or
nearly co-located VORs with the same FAA id.

also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to 1000
feet?


RVSM (Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums(?)) were phased in quite recently.
They came about because of improvements in altimeter technology, and maybe
also as a result of TCAS and mode-S.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
please excuse my typing, but my whole left arm is in a cast. and i don't
mean _the king and i_.
  #4  
Old September 25th 05, 04:25 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Retro Pilot" wrote in message
...

how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter
identifiers?


They haven't, not really. The 4-letter identifier is the ICAO identifier.
They've been in use since probably some time in the fifties. They've only
come into common domestic use in recent years because of GPS databases and
the need to distinguish airports from navaids of the same identifier. The
3-letter airport identifiers are just as valid as ever.



also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to
1000 feet?


US domestic RVSM, Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums, was implemented
January 20, 2005.


  #5  
Old September 25th 05, 04:38 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:rOyZe.1925$%L4.26@trndny02...

I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean an identifier like KABE,
where the "K" indicates a U.S. airport, I first saw that in 1989, and it
had been that way for many years. I haven't seen four-letter Ids in the
States where the first letter wasn't "K."


The "K" indicates an airport in the contiguous 48 states. Alaskan ICAO
identifiers begin with PA, PF, PO, or PP, and Hawaiian ICAO identifiers
begin with PH.



IIRC, sometime last year, but it could've been a bit earlier.


A bit later, actually, January 20th 2005.



The new
collision avoidance systems make closer separation standards possible.


It's not collision avoidance systems that make RVSM possible, it's new
altitude tolerance criteria. An aircraft type has to demonstrate it can
remain within a specific altitude error tolerance. Some older aircraft types
required improvements in their autopilot and air data systems to meet the
standard, some required special attention to the skin surface in the area
surrounding the static ports.


  #6  
Old September 25th 05, 05:59 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:rOyZe.1925$%L4.26@trndny02...
Retro Pilot wrote:
how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter
identifiers?


I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean an identifier like KABE,
where the "K" indicates a U.S. airport, I first saw that in 1989, and it
had been that way for many years. I haven't seen four-letter Ids in the
States where the first letter wasn't "K."

also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to
1000 feet?


IIRC, sometime last year, but it could've been a bit earlier. The new
collision avoidance systems make closer separation standards possible.


RVSM began this past January.




  #7  
Old September 25th 05, 10:10 PM
ShawnD2112
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, here's another question, then. Where do the common identifiers used
for major commercial aiports come from? For instance, Heathrow is LHR on
baggage tags and airline systems, but I don't think it's ICAO identifier is
ELHR. Same queston for BOS, LAX, PHI, etc.

Shawn

"Retro Pilot" wrote in message
...
how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter
identifiers?

also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to
1000 feet?

and, no, I was not doing time in prison for the past 20 years for
trafficking.





  #8  
Old September 25th 05, 10:32 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "ShawnD2112" said:
Well, here's another question, then. Where do the common identifiers used
for major commercial aiports come from? For instance, Heathrow is LHR on


IATA.
(International Air Travel Association, I think)

--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
please excuse my typing, but my whole left arm is in a cast. and i don't
mean _the king and i_.
  #9  
Old September 26th 05, 12:56 AM
rotor&wing rotor&wing is offline
Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Sep 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 38
Default

above FL290 seperation is now 1000 ft.
  #10  
Old September 26th 05, 01:47 AM
Steve Rubin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article et,
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
They haven't, not really. The 4-letter identifier is the ICAO identifier.
They've been in use since probably some time in the fifties. They've only
come into common domestic use in recent years because of GPS databases and
the need to distinguish airports from navaids of the same identifier. The
3-letter airport identifiers are just as valid as ever.


There are also private airports (atleast here in california) that have
4 digit's.

http://airnav.com/airport/CA20

for example.


--
Steve Rubin / AE6CH / http://www.altdb.net/
Email: / N6441C / http://www.tch.org/~ser/
"Why don't you mind your own business?" -- John Navas 01/04/05
"If you don't like it, keep it to yourself" -- John Navas 01/04/05
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
High-tech gizmos propel aviation into the future Omega Piloting 3 June 11th 05 06:48 AM
ATC User Fees Larry Dighera Piloting 80 May 12th 05 07:20 AM
Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Calls Controller Whistleblowers "Rogue Employees!!! Bill Mulcahy General Aviation 0 March 31st 05 04:29 AM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Home Built 3 May 14th 04 11:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.