![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter
identifiers? also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to 1000 feet? and, no, I was not doing time in prison for the past 20 years for trafficking. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Retro Pilot wrote:
how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter identifiers? I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean an identifier like KABE, where the "K" indicates a U.S. airport, I first saw that in 1989, and it had been that way for many years. I haven't seen four-letter Ids in the States where the first letter wasn't "K." also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to 1000 feet? IIRC, sometime last year, but it could've been a bit earlier. The new collision avoidance systems make closer separation standards possible. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Retro Pilot" said:
how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter identifiers? You're confusing two types of identifiers. FAA identifiers are three letters or letters and numbers. ICAO identifiers are four letters long, the first letter identifies a region, and they don't allow numbers. The continental US is the region with the identifier "K". By convention, those airports in the continental US with ICAO identifiers just use their FAA id with a K put on the front for their ICAO id. Most of the world uses a more complicated system with the second letter designating a sub-region. Hawaii, Alaska, the US Virgin Islands and other places use "P" and a second code letter, and then the mapping between the FAA id and the ICAO id is more complicated. US pilots became more aware of the ICAO identifiers when the US started using METAR and TAF weather reporting formats, the same as the rest of the world. That happened about 10 years ago. We had to change the FAA id of several airports to elminate numbers so that they could be given ICAO ids. Also, GPSes use the ICAO id rather than the FAA id when the airport has an ICAO id, just to reduce confusion between airport ids and co-located or nearly co-located VORs with the same FAA id. also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to 1000 feet? RVSM (Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums(?)) were phased in quite recently. They came about because of improvements in altimeter technology, and maybe also as a result of TCAS and mode-S. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ please excuse my typing, but my whole left arm is in a cast. and i don't mean _the king and i_. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Retro Pilot" wrote in message ... how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter identifiers? They haven't, not really. The 4-letter identifier is the ICAO identifier. They've been in use since probably some time in the fifties. They've only come into common domestic use in recent years because of GPS databases and the need to distinguish airports from navaids of the same identifier. The 3-letter airport identifiers are just as valid as ever. also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to 1000 feet? US domestic RVSM, Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums, was implemented January 20, 2005. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message news:rOyZe.1925$%L4.26@trndny02... I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean an identifier like KABE, where the "K" indicates a U.S. airport, I first saw that in 1989, and it had been that way for many years. I haven't seen four-letter Ids in the States where the first letter wasn't "K." The "K" indicates an airport in the contiguous 48 states. Alaskan ICAO identifiers begin with PA, PF, PO, or PP, and Hawaiian ICAO identifiers begin with PH. IIRC, sometime last year, but it could've been a bit earlier. A bit later, actually, January 20th 2005. The new collision avoidance systems make closer separation standards possible. It's not collision avoidance systems that make RVSM possible, it's new altitude tolerance criteria. An aircraft type has to demonstrate it can remain within a specific altitude error tolerance. Some older aircraft types required improvements in their autopilot and air data systems to meet the standard, some required special attention to the skin surface in the area surrounding the static ports. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message news:rOyZe.1925$%L4.26@trndny02... Retro Pilot wrote: how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter identifiers? I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean an identifier like KABE, where the "K" indicates a U.S. airport, I first saw that in 1989, and it had been that way for many years. I haven't seen four-letter Ids in the States where the first letter wasn't "K." also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to 1000 feet? IIRC, sometime last year, but it could've been a bit earlier. The new collision avoidance systems make closer separation standards possible. RVSM began this past January. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, here's another question, then. Where do the common identifiers used
for major commercial aiports come from? For instance, Heathrow is LHR on baggage tags and airline systems, but I don't think it's ICAO identifier is ELHR. Same queston for BOS, LAX, PHI, etc. Shawn "Retro Pilot" wrote in message ... how long has it been since airports have gone from 3-to-4 letter identifiers? also, when did ATC go from 2000 feet vertical separation above FL290 to 1000 feet? and, no, I was not doing time in prison for the past 20 years for trafficking. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "ShawnD2112" said:
Well, here's another question, then. Where do the common identifiers used for major commercial aiports come from? For instance, Heathrow is LHR on IATA. (International Air Travel Association, I think) -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ please excuse my typing, but my whole left arm is in a cast. and i don't mean _the king and i_. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
above FL290 seperation is now 1000 ft.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Steven P. McNicoll wrote: They haven't, not really. The 4-letter identifier is the ICAO identifier. They've been in use since probably some time in the fifties. They've only come into common domestic use in recent years because of GPS databases and the need to distinguish airports from navaids of the same identifier. The 3-letter airport identifiers are just as valid as ever. There are also private airports (atleast here in california) that have 4 digit's. http://airnav.com/airport/CA20 for example. -- Steve Rubin / AE6CH / http://www.altdb.net/ Email: / N6441C / http://www.tch.org/~ser/ "Why don't you mind your own business?" -- John Navas 01/04/05 "If you don't like it, keep it to yourself" -- John Navas 01/04/05 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
High-tech gizmos propel aviation into the future | Omega | Piloting | 3 | June 11th 05 06:48 AM |
ATC User Fees | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 80 | May 12th 05 07:20 AM |
Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Calls Controller Whistleblowers "Rogue Employees!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 0 | March 31st 05 04:29 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |