![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It looks like I'm about to become the owner of a warbird which will
require setting up Experimental Operating Limitations with the FAA. I'm planning on calling the FAA and the EAA on Monday, but is there anyone out there who has gone through this before? I have a copy of the letter the current owner has on file and I'm assuming I need to develop a similar letter with my local FSDO, with a map of my 300nm operating radius, along with the listing of planned exhibition events. I know what the final results of getting these operating limitations set up looks like because I have the current ones. However, I'm a little unclear on the process of how to get these set up in the first place and on file officially. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks, Eric |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought warbirds operated in the "LIMITED" category, not
"EXPERIMENTAL"? It looks like I'm about to become the owner of a warbird which will require setting up Experimental Operating Limitations with the FAA. I'm planning on calling the FAA and the EAA on Monday, but is there anyone out there who has gone through this before? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know that many Warbirds (including this one) are under the
Experimental category as "Racing and Exhibition" aircraft. FAA order 8130.27 spells out the limitations for 4 groups of aircraft that encompass just about any type of warbird that I can think of (except ones that are certified as standard category planes). What I'm still not entirely clear on is how I get the letter from the FAA that is based on 8130.27, spelling out the limitations. I'm assuming this is much easier on a plane that has already been operated in the US by 2 prior owners (the flight test requirements should be already met I assume). I'm still reading through all of the documentation I can find, but if someone has gone through this recently and can spell out the steps they took to ensure that they were legal, I'd appreciate it. I'll be calling the local FSDO on Monday morning but I'd like to have some idea what I'm talking to them about. Thanks, Eric |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know that many Warbirds (including this one) are under the
Experimental category as "Racing and Exhibition" aircraft. FAA order 8130.27 spells out the limitations for 4 groups of aircraft that encompass just about any type of warbird that I can think of (except ones that are certified as standard category planes). What I'm still not entirely clear on is how I get the letter from the FAA that is based on 8130.27, spelling out the limitations. I'm assuming this is much easier on a plane that has already been operated in the US by 2 prior owners (the flight test requirements should be already met I assume). I'm still reading through all of the documentation I can find, but if someone has gone through this recently and can spell out the steps they took to ensure that they were legal, I'd appreciate it. I'll be calling the local FSDO on Monday morning but I'd like to have some idea what I'm talking to them about. Thanks, Eric |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You should only have to apply for a change to the operating limitations if
the old ones specify an airport from which you have to operate. If that's the case, all you should have to do is contact your local FSDO and request amended operating limitations to reflect new base airport, radius and whatever aspects apply locally. I am assuming that you already meet the requirements to fly the a/c, which vary quite a bit depending on the aircraft. The categories are I through IV and they apply to all experimental exhibition aircraft, not just warbirds. Category IV is the most restrictive. Juan wrote in message ps.com... It looks like I'm about to become the owner of a warbird which will require setting up Experimental Operating Limitations with the FAA. I'm planning on calling the FAA and the EAA on Monday, but is there anyone out there who has gone through this before? I have a copy of the letter the current owner has on file and I'm assuming I need to develop a similar letter with my local FSDO, with a map of my 300nm operating radius, along with the listing of planned exhibition events. I know what the final results of getting these operating limitations set up looks like because I have the current ones. However, I'm a little unclear on the process of how to get these set up in the first place and on file officially. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks, Eric |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Juan Jimenez wrote: You should only have to apply for a change to the operating limitations if the old ones specify an airport from which you have to operate. If that's the case, all you should have to do is contact your local FSDO and request amended operating limitations to reflect new base airport, radius and whatever aspects apply locally. I am assuming that you already meet the requirements to fly the a/c, which vary quite a bit depending on the aircraft. The categories are I through IV and they apply to all experimental exhibition aircraft, not just warbirds. Category IV is the most restrictive. Not all warbirds are Experimental Exhibition either. I take it you are buying a vodka rocket? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually its a Pilatus P-3, Lycoming piston engined trainer. It is the
Swiss equivalent of a T-34, but it was never certified in the US, hence the Experimental Exhibition categorization. Its built a lot heavier that a T-34 and they all have a lot less total time than the T-34s do (they all seem to be between 3000 and 4000 hours TT vs. 10,000 hours on a lot of theT-34s). This is the great-grandfather of the current USAF T-6A Texan II. It evolved from the P-3 to the PC-7 with the addition of the PT-6 engine and some airframe mods, then to the PC-9 with ejection seats and a larger turbine, and then to the T-6A with even more power & modifications for the USAF. Eric |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bret Ludwig" wrote in message oups.com... Juan Jimenez wrote: You should only have to apply for a change to the operating limitations if the old ones specify an airport from which you have to operate. If that's the case, all you should have to do is contact your local FSDO and request amended operating limitations to reflect new base airport, radius and whatever aspects apply locally. I am assuming that you already meet the requirements to fly the a/c, which vary quite a bit depending on the aircraft. The categories are I through IV and they apply to all experimental exhibition aircraft, not just warbirds. Category IV is the most restrictive. Not all warbirds are Experimental Exhibition either. I take it you are buying a vodka rocket? I suppose that needs to be pointed out, of course. Few people know, for example, that some P-51's operate under standard airworthiness certificates, for example. ![]() I'm not buying anything, I'm trying to get my BD-5J's airworthiness certificate issued. FAA is not exactly very cooperative, and there are no DAR's here. I'm getting it sorted out, plane's been ready for the final condition inspection for weeks now, but lack of a place where I can take it to get it inspected, and lack of cooperation from the weather, keeps putting things off. ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've seen this one, nice aircraft. There's 19 of those in the US registry,
shouldn't be a problem getting the operating limitations amended. The key to this is always developing a good working relationship with the local FSDO. Makes things run much smoother. Just go talk to them and ask (call first and make an appointment). Emphasize you have not yet bought the aircraft, but want to do your homework first and ask for their advice. You'll find that, with some exceptions, the vast majority of the FSDO people want to help out and will give you all the info you need. wrote in message oups.com... Actually its a Pilatus P-3, Lycoming piston engined trainer. It is the Swiss equivalent of a T-34, but it was never certified in the US, hence the Experimental Exhibition categorization. Its built a lot heavier that a T-34 and they all have a lot less total time than the T-34s do (they all seem to be between 3000 and 4000 hours TT vs. 10,000 hours on a lot of theT-34s). This is the great-grandfather of the current USAF T-6A Texan II. It evolved from the P-3 to the PC-7 with the addition of the PT-6 engine and some airframe mods, then to the PC-9 with ejection seats and a larger turbine, and then to the T-6A with even more power & modifications for the USAF. Eric |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the help. I'll be talking to the FSDO tomorrow morning
so it sounds like ammending the operating limitations shouldn't be an issue. Eric |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying Club with Experimental Aircraft | Jeff | Home Built | 6 | October 5th 05 09:16 PM |
Experimental exhibition limitations question | Comcast | Soaring | 7 | October 1st 05 06:45 AM |
Experimental planes at air shows? | Eugene Maslov | Home Built | 4 | May 31st 05 05:09 PM |
Experimental or not? | John D. Abrahms | Home Built | 23 | April 14th 05 01:45 AM |
Florida Mil Comms; Tico Warbird Acft | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 4 | March 16th 04 01:49 PM |