![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably a case of "too little -- too late" -- but finally a step in
the right direction! (This just in, from Yahoo News): ************************************************** ****** House narrowly approves bill to help US refineries By Chris Baltimore In a cliffhanger vote held open by Republican leaders until they won, the U.S. House of Representatives passed by two votes on Friday a bill clearing the way for U.S. oil refineries to expand. The legislation, written by Republican Joe Barton of Texas, barely won approval despite dropping a White House-backed provision that would have gutted clean air rules to help refineries and coal-powered utilities. In the first major House vote since Texan Tom DeLay was forced to step down as majority leader, Republicans won, 212-210, in a roll call that ran more than 40 minutes, far beyond the allotted five minutes. Democrats in the chamber chanted "shame, shame, shame" as the final tally was announced. When over two dozen Republicans initially voted no, DeLay, Barton, House Speaker Dennis Hastert and new Majority Leader Roy Blunt circled the chamber and cajoled the holdouts. The palm-sweating vote switched from "yes" to "no" several times, but Republican Rep. Mike Simpson (news, bio, voting record), the speaker pro tempore, did not gavel the vote closed until it swung in the Republicans' favor. Several Democrats protested that the vote was being held open. "I am informed that every member of Congress who is in town has voted," Democratic whip Rep. Steny Hoyer (news, bio, voting record) of Maryland said at one point, when the tally was 210 yes, 214 no. House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi also complained, saying the proceedings were bringing "dishonor to the House." The bill aims to add 2 million barrels per day of capacity by offering abandoned military bases for refinery construction sites. It also speeds up permits by giving the Energy Department more authority over the process, and offer federal insurance to refiners in case new projects are delayed. The bill was prompted by hurricanes Rita and Katrina, which plowed through the heart of the U.S. energy producing region and shut offshore drilling rigs and refineries. Its most controversial item would have deleted a portion of the Clean Air Act known as "new source review" that requires costly new equipment to cut emissions when refineries and coal-fired power plants are expanded. However, Barton was forced to drop that proposal from the bill late on Thursday because of opposition from Democrats and moderate Republicans. Although the plan to dismantle new source review was a White House priority, the administration released a statement saying it still supported the legislation. "We look forward to working with Congress to improve the bill further as it moves forward in the legislative process," the White House said. No new U.S. refinery has been built since 1976 and dozens of plants have been closed despite rising fuel consumption. "We haven't built a new refinery in a generation. We need more," said Rep. Fred Upton (news, bio, voting record), Michigan Republican. Democrats say refiners are loath to build new facilities amid record-high profits, while Republicans say permitting and environmental requirements keep them from expanding. Refiners are "making more money from refining less gasoline," said Rep. Rick Boucher (news, bio, voting record), Virginia Democrat. Rep. Edward Markey (news, bio, voting record), Massachusetts Democrat, said refiners have engaged in a "systematic conspiracy" to idle capacity, pointing to some 30 plants that were closed in recent years. Democrats were unsuccessful in pushing an alternate bill that would create spare refineries that the federal government could activate during gasoline shortages. The House Rules Committee blocked a bipartisan plan by Markey and Sherwood Boehlert of New York to require an 8-mile-per-gallon rise in vehicle mileage to curb gasoline demand. Consumer groups said the legislation would do little to help American households facing near-record fuel prices. "Its approach leaves the decision to increase refining capacity in the hands of an industry that has deliberately taken advantage of tight supplies in recent years," said Mark Cooper of the Consumer Federation of America. Other provisions in the bill include: * Expanding Northeast Heating Oil Reserve to 5 million barrels, from current 2 million barrels; * Limiting anti-pollution gasoline blends to six, from the current 17; * Requiring FTC to prepare a report on the price of gasoline and heating oil on the New York Mercantile Exchange; * Waives federal, state and local fuel additive requirements after a natural disaster that disrupts supplies; * Gives Federal Energy Regulatory Commission the power to monitor offshore gas gathering lines to prevent anti-competitive practices. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
ups.com... [article with zero aviation content snipped] You forgot to put "OT:" in your subject line. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote:
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... [article with zero aviation content snipped] You forgot to put "OT:" in your subject line. Quite right - as any good airman knows, aircraft are powered by wishing really really hard, not gasoline! So gasoline has nothing to do with aviation, and anything you read otherwise are lies. Remember - don't fill your tanks with gas - fill them with wishes! Saves money and you get to make engine noises like you did when you were a kid. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pesky Irritant wrote:
"Peter Duniho" wrote: "Jay Honeck" wrote in message roups.com... [article with zero aviation content snipped] You forgot to put "OT:" in your subject line. Quite right - as any good airman knows, aircraft are powered by wishing really really hard, not gasoline! So gasoline has nothing to do with aviation, and anything you read otherwise are lies. Remember - don't fill your tanks with gas - fill them with wishes! Saves money and you get to make engine noises like you did when you were a kid. ROTFLMAO ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Remember - don't fill your tanks with gas - fill them with wishes! Saves
money and you get to make engine noises like you did when you were a kid. People with wishes and no gas manage to fly all the time. People with gas but no wishes should probably fly away. Jose -- Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pesky Irritant" wrote in message
... Quite right - as any good airman knows, aircraft are powered by wishing really really hard, not gasoline! So gasoline has nothing to do with aviation, and anything you read otherwise are lies. The cost of gasoline affects any number of things. It does not mean that the cost of gasoline is relevant in any number of newsgroups, especially when the topic isn't even directly related to *aviation* gas. That said, I did find your post quite funny...good job! ![]() It's still all off-topic. Pete |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That said, I did find your post quite funny...good job!
![]() Just to keep things pure, next time I'll make the subject "AVgas Prices -- Help at Last?" -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 00:27:36 GMT, Jay Honeck wrote:
Just to keep things pure, next time I'll make the subject "AVgas Prices -- Help at Last?" so they will refine 100LL at the new site? #m -- Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:43:10 -0000, Pesky Irritant
wrote: "Peter Duniho" wrote: "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... [article with zero aviation content snipped] You forgot to put "OT:" in your subject line. Quite right - as any good airman knows, aircraft are powered by wishing really really hard, not gasoline! No, you missed that one in ground school. Aircraft are powered by money. Cost of operation is based on the square of the speed, distance/range, and capacity of the aircraft and proportional to the square of the time spent in storage. IE, it's going to cost a bunch based on the capability of the aircraft whether you fly it or not. Aircraft have emotions and will get even if you let them just set in a hangar some where. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com So gasoline has nothing to do with aviation, and anything you read otherwise are lies. Remember - don't fill your tanks with gas - fill them with wishes! Saves money and you get to make engine noises like you did when you were a kid. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... [article with zero aviation content snipped] You forgot to put "OT:" in your subject line. Agreed, OT, and just another win for BIG OIL. I hope the senate has a better handle on what subsidies look like and what profits are for... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gas Prices Coming Down | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 15 | September 10th 05 03:07 PM |
Our local fuel prices just went up again! | Peter R. | Piloting | 17 | May 28th 04 06:08 PM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Owning | 77 | February 22nd 04 12:02 AM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Piloting | 81 | February 22nd 04 12:02 AM |
Web site for fuel prices? | Frode Berg | Owning | 3 | July 11th 03 02:38 PM |