![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to see a new class in soaring competition
in the future. I am thinking of a class where one is allowed to utilize electro-solar energy beside the usual ways to generate lift. As things goes today we use slopes, waves and thermals to keep us flying and that governs the way our glider are built and the way our competitions are constructed. I think it is time to think new and move ahead. If FAI would declare a competition for, lets say, the summer of 2008 in witch glider equipped with solar panels and electric motors could race it might promote the industry to develop new machines. I am just a layman, not an engineer, so please take this as my humble vision of things to come. I really don’t know if this is possible but I believe it is. Imagine a modern 18 meter glider with solar panels on all available surfaces and a fixed electric motor in the nose or on the fin. Just like a modern electric model glider. The power from the solar panels would probably not be sufficient to make the glider climb but well to enormously extend the gliders effective glide ratio. When you are thermaling under a cloud the solar panels would probably not deliver very much power and so the motor would just spin along, neither puling nor inducing drag. When you leave the cloud to speed on to the next thermal the panels will be exposed to the sun and the motor would start to pull. There would be no need to fold the propeller blades and no need to fold the motor in to the fuselage since the motor at all times would produce thrust to out weight the induced drag. Maybe it is possible to make a system like this to function as a generator in a strong thermal. If you carry batteries you might be able to charge them by letting the motor windmill while you climb and then use that energy in the final run. Of course batteries could also extend your glide range extensively in the same way as a turbo if you screw up far from home. I don’t think it would be a big problem to keep track of how much power that is gained via the solar panels and how much power that is taken from the batteries if that would be an issue with the rules of a competition. A big competition could maybe promote the industry to start thinking and developing and gliding as a whole would take a step further. Finally, I apologise for my English. It is not my mother languish. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Finally, I apologise for my English. It is not my mother
languish. No need to apologize. Your English is better than some around here that have spoken it all their lives as their mother language - and some of them can't read/write it at all. Most of us in the US don't have a second language so your already one up on us. But back to the intent of the post. I think the idea is a good one. Unfortunatly I just don't see it happening until the technology needed is reduced in price considerably. The model builders have some pretty efficent and probably powerfull enough motors to be practical but I just haven't seen anything in the way of solar panels that have the combination of output/weight/cost to use in such a sailplane. If they exist I'd sure like to know about them. A practical solar/electric sustainer motor might go a long way to making soaring, in general, more popular. Till then small turbines running on BioDiesel may be the best way in the near future to make enviromentally friendly motorgliders. ============== Leon McAtee Bablefish.com .. second language for the ignorant |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A diana needs an effective power of approx 55N*30m/s= 1650 watt
*Total usable surface for solar panels 8 M^2 *Max sun power about 1250 watt/m^2. Let`s say, average European conditions: 350 watt/M^2. Ordinary solar panels have a coefficient of about 12%. Best available are 25% but perhaps they`re way too expensive (about 250.000 euro`s for the Nuna for example) Let`s say 18%, that`s a reduction of sink of about 30% (at 100 km/h) leading to a glide ratio of 1:72. Heck, that`s more than the Eta!!! Also take a look at: http://www.solar-flight.com/med_res_wing_mount_copy.jpg Doesn`t look too bad although I prefer the Diana... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sunglide | Jannica Wunge | Soaring | 1 | October 14th 05 06:45 PM |