![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some work was done on an airplane. The new W&B is of the "removed/added"
sort and computes a new empty weight and moment arm. But the document doesn't state the gross weight. The changes were all avionics; no airframe or power plant work was done. So I'd expect the gross weight to remain unchanged from the prior W&B. But does the new W&B need to state the gross weight, even if it is unchanged? If not, do we then need both documents to cover the legalities of documentation in the airplane? Or did the person that wrote the new W&B err? - Andrew |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need to list the new empty weight; gross weight shouldn't change without
an STC. Seth "Andrew Gideon" wrote in message online.com... Some work was done on an airplane. The new W&B is of the "removed/added" sort and computes a new empty weight and moment arm. But the document doesn't state the gross weight. The changes were all avionics; no airframe or power plant work was done. So I'd expect the gross weight to remain unchanged from the prior W&B. But does the new W&B need to state the gross weight, even if it is unchanged? If not, do we then need both documents to cover the legalities of documentation in the airplane? Or did the person that wrote the new W&B err? - Andrew |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew Gideon wrote: Some work was done on an airplane. The new W&B is of the "removed/added" sort and computes a new empty weight and moment arm. But the document doesn't state the gross weight. The changes were all avionics; no airframe or power plant work was done. So I'd expect the gross weight to remain unchanged from the prior W&B. But does the new W&B need to state the gross weight, even if it is unchanged? If not, do we then need both documents to cover the legalities of documentation in the airplane? I have never seen a W+B that didn't list the gross weight. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gideon wrote:
Some work was done on an airplane. The new W&B is of the "removed/added" sort and computes a new empty weight and moment arm. But the document doesn't state the gross weight. Mine doesn't. The gross weight and the CG envelope are listed in the operating limitations book. The Type Certificate requires the equipment list AND the operating limitations book. There's no specific requirement for W&B paperwork in the regs despite what your flight instructor told you. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
I have never seen a W+B that didn't list the gross weight. Mine doesn't, not even the original factory one did. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have never seen a W+B that didn't list the gross weight. If you are talking Max Gross Weight, transport category aircraft don't list it with the last weigh job or re-calculation. It is however listed elsewhere in the Type Certificate Data Sheet, Weight and Balance Manual and the Limitation section of the AFM. Long and short of it is there is no requirement to have that limitation listed with the new weight and balance calculations. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
There's no specific requirement for W&B paperwork in the regs despite what your flight instructor told you. I have found 23.1583, which states that maximum weight and center of gravity limits are part of the aircraft manual, and 23.1519 which states that weight and CG limits are a part of operating limitations. But what's the documentation requirement for equipment changes which alter one or more of these factors? 23.21 discusses this for type certification, but not for upgrades. I've found nothing which discusses that. I'd have expected something in part 43, but I'm not seeing it. - Andrew |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
Mine doesn't.Â*Â*TheÂ*grossÂ*weightÂ*andÂ*theÂ*CGÂ*enve lopeÂ*areÂ*listedÂ*inÂ*the operating limitations book.Â*Â*Â*TheÂ*TypeÂ*CertificateÂ*requiresÂ*the equipment list AND the operating limitations book. But what documentation is required for aircraft changes which alter the empty weight and CG? If that documentation doesn't list the gross weight, is it safe (ie. safe in a ramp check {8^) to assume that it's unchanged? - Andrew |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew Gideon wrote: Ron Natalie wrote: Mine doesn't. The gross weight and the CG envelope are listed in the operating limitations book. The Type Certificate requires the equipment list AND the operating limitations book. But what documentation is required for aircraft changes which alter the empty weight and CG? If that documentation doesn't list the gross weight, is it safe (ie. safe in a ramp check {8^) to assume that it's unchanged? You're talking empty weight. Gross weight is the max the airplane can weigh. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
I have never seen a W+B that didn't list the gross weight. IIRC, the one for my Maule didn't. It was listed elsewhere in the owner's manual. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gross Weight | Fred Choate | Piloting | 153 | July 14th 05 12:19 AM |
Max gross weight | Chris | Piloting | 21 | October 5th 04 08:22 PM |
Apache Alternate Gross Weight | Jim Burns | Owning | 1 | July 6th 04 05:15 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
F35 cost goes up. | Pat Carpenter | Military Aviation | 116 | April 11th 04 07:32 PM |