![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
just curious if anyone here has seen
the movie - "Stealth", and have any comments regarding the premise behind it. received this movie review from a friend --- allright, "Stealth" is an - "ok" movie. certainly not deserving of the 'don't-waste-your-time' opinion your son had of it. it's hokey in the onset - "Navy Air Force" .... as you say - "HAH !" ... that'll be the day ... not in our lifetimes, ain't happening. there's one scene with a "tech" supporting the star of the movie (the aircraft). That dude is portrayed as your stereotypical computer geek. In real life, wouldn't happen - the contractor of the aircraft would have an entire team of people on ship dedicated to supporting the hardware ( even more so if it's in test phases). the computer generated imagery (cgi) was incredible. very detailed and realistic. the credits at the end of the movie went on for quite sometime listing all the people involved to create the visual sequences. basic story line, was hokey, but i liked the actual shots taken aboard the aircraft carriers (they were allowed to film during real flight deck operations). "average" viewer probably wouldn't have noticed, but they filmed the movie on 3 different carriers ( it's supposed to be portrayed as one). The hull numbers in some scenes kept changing. Even at the end, while the credits were rolling, it includes "special thanks to 3rd Fleet, and sailors and crew of --" and listed the 3 carriers they filmed on. one scene near the end had the actors at the end of the fantail of the boat. in the background (again most people wouldn't know what it was), there was an F-18 engine (PW F404) on a test stand...probably an actual engine since that's where they'll run them up for testing (jet blast aimed outward). so the movie was a strange of mix of very authentic scenes and very hokey scenes. there was some publicity shot for the movie that had the actors next to an actual Boeing X-45A UCAV (Unarmed Combat Air Vehicle). It's an advanced (at the moment) drone. So that prompted Boeing to make some press releases, that (a). their product is NOT autonomous (a computer operating on it's own). (b). There is always a human involved. (c). Human pilot has final authority on release of any weapons, not the machine. In the film, the aircraft was called an EDI UCAV (Extreme Deep Invader - UCAV). It was a very hot piece of hardware. Nicknamed it "Eddie". For a moment there, when the one pilot and the machine had become buddies, all you could think of was Michael Knight & KITT. What was even more slick though were the "Talon" fighter jets that were being used by the actors. They were depicted as mach 4+ capable and using scramjet powerplants. At least the outward design looked really mean & aggressive. Strange to see them mixed with the F-18C's on the deck. Of course forget about cockpit layout, typical Hollywood drivel. overall, again, an "ok" movie, but not the most realistic. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mystery plane! - New stealth fighter | Chris Gumm | Piloting | 34 | October 13th 04 05:09 PM |
North Korea Denounces US Stealth Bomber Deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 2nd 04 09:20 PM |
Why is Stealth So Important? | James Dandy | Military Aviation | 148 | January 20th 04 04:17 PM |
F-32 vs F-35 | The Raven | Military Aviation | 60 | January 17th 04 08:36 PM |
How long until current 'stealth' techniques are compromised? | muskau | Military Aviation | 38 | January 5th 04 04:27 AM |