![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just wondering... Is it just me or has anyone else thought that some
of the thugs in here are actually wimps in real life and the wimps in here are the first to punch someone's lights out in real life? I'm thinking that since people prone to violence actually are nicer in here because they have time to think about it before responding where as in real life, they'd just react. The naggers, the big mouths and the bitchers (thugs) in here are that way because they have the safety of distance. What are your thoughts? The Monk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I totally agree. You hit the nail on the head.
Take Dudley Henriques for example. He is a little (probably in more ways than one) hothead in the newsgroups. Yet when I called him to the table, he withdrew. It has been my general experience that the hotheads are insecure, and the calm ones are very secure. Reason being? Simple -- the insecure are hotheads because they think it proves their machoness or something. The calm ones have nothing to prove. Thanks for bringing this to the surface. Good post! Lynne |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Flyingmonk" wrote in message
ups.com... Just wondering... Is it just me or has anyone else thought that some of the thugs in here are actually wimps in real life and the wimps in here are the first to punch someone's lights out in real life? Perhaps, but there are some of us who are just as much of a sociopath in real life as we are on USENET, so one might be safer not to make such assumptions... evil-grin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flyingmonk wrote:
I'm thinking that since people prone to violence actually are nicer in here because they have time to think about it before responding where as in real life, they'd just react. I cannot speak to that. I do know that some people do seem to reply w/o thinking on USENET and mailing lists, so I'm not so sure that we can assume people are always taking time to think. However, I can related my experience having grown up raising dogs. In general, small dogs are loud. Large dogs tend to be quiet. I've plenty of examples where small dogs would "bully" larger dogs with their barking while the larger dogs would "submit". To a point. Once that point was passed, the large dog would take a quick nip and the small dog's bullying would end. But only for a while. Then the cycle would repeat itself. I've seen exceptions to this too, so it's only a vague generalization. Another possible guide is that swords rattle only in poorly fitting sheaths, and never when drawn. - Andrew |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flyingmonk wrote:
Just wondering... Is it just me or has anyone else thought that some of the thugs in here are actually wimps in real life and the wimps in here are the first to punch someone's lights out in real life? I'm thinking that since people prone to violence actually are nicer in here because they have time to think about it before responding where as in real life, they'd just react. The naggers, the big mouths and the bitchers (thugs) in here are that way because they have the safety of distance. What are your thoughts? I think you are thinking too much. :-) Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Take Dudley Henriques for example. He is a little (probably in more
ways than one) hothead in the newsgroups. Yet when I called him to the table, he withdrew. I've spoken with Dudley on the phone, and he is a perfect gentlemen. It's been my experience that the written word often comes across far more harshly than the writer intended. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lynne" wrote in message oups.com... I totally agree. You hit the nail on the head. Take Dudley Henriques for example. He is a little (probably in more ways than one) hothead in the newsgroups. Yet when I called him to the table, he withdrew. Oh, you did, huh? How about you give Jay H, or any other regular here the name and address and phone number of the lawyer, that you put the money down in escrow with, when you "called him to the table." We all know you won't. Prove us wrong. You are such a fake. I just want to put that information out around here, so no newbies think you are for real. -- Jim in NC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's the story between Lynne -N- Dudley? I must have missed this.
The Monk |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flyingmonk wrote:
What are your thoughts? I wouldn't count on it. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Flyingmonk" wrote in message
ups.com... [...] The naggers, the big mouths and the bitchers (thugs) in here are that way because they have the safety of distance. What are your thoughts? Yup, you're right. Every single one of the many outspoken individuals found here in this newsgroup is a shrinking violet in real life. Your insight is amazing! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Magnetic reversal | Everett M. Greene | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 9th 05 09:40 AM |
Canada's role in the future | John Locke | Military Aviation | 8 | June 20th 04 07:00 AM |
U.S. air force has its own space-age plan America intends to take dominant role | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 20th 04 11:29 PM |
Complete Reversal or Not? | Greg Esres | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 12th 04 10:05 AM |
D'Amato's Role Investigated in La Guardia Airport Deal | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 0 | December 25th 03 05:47 AM |