![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
We're looking into a twin and the Twin Comanche is on our list. I know that the later models have the counter rotating props -- although i don't know too much about what this means, other than its "better". We fly a mooney now and thus I don't worry about the prop -- as long as it keeps spinning. Is there a web site that gives a good explanation as to why I want CR props. There are hundreds of the earlier model Twin Comanches flying without the CR props --- so what does someone with 300 hours single engine time need to worry about? What actually goes wrong? And when it does, what happens? I hear "critical engine" but it means very little to me. I like to fly and try to be very careful when I do fly... but I don't follow too much aviation stuff other than how it affects me -- so I'm not exactly a "buff", hence the above questions which may seem obvious to many. Why are we looking at a Twin Comanche? Because its a twin, safer for IFR flight (perhaps this is only preceived), plus we live on the east coast on an island so we're flying over water quite a bit. Also this plane has decent speed and is an "economical" twin. We rarely fly with 4 people, so we don't need any more seats than 4. Any help or links to help would be appreciated. Thanks, Dico |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Think about what you do with your right foot during takeoff.
"Dico" wrote in message oups.com... Hello, We're looking into a twin and the Twin Comanche is on our list. I know that the later models have the counter rotating props -- although i don't know too much about what this means, other than its "better". Thanks, Dico |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 04:17:23 GMT, "Michael Ware" wrote:
"Dico" wrote in message oups.com... We're looking into a twin and the Twin Comanche is on our list. I know that the later models have the counter rotating props -- although i don't know too much about what this means, other than its "better". Thanks, Think about what you do with your right foot during takeoff. Most trigear pilots are scratching themselves behind the right ear. :-) Ron Wanttaja |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I push the rudder with my right foot. This doesn't really answer my
questions though. Like I said, I'm not a "buff" and don't know much about twins. -Dico |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
that's right. i am trying to get you to think why you have to do this,
therefore leading to the reasons why you might want counter-rotating props. "Dico" wrote in message oups.com... I push the rudder with my right foot. This doesn't really answer my questions though. Like I said, I'm not a "buff" and don't know much about twins. -Dico |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So with counter rotating props I won't have the plane want to go left?
Or I'd really have to hammer down the right rudder? Even worse if one engine quit, I could be screwed? And I'm guessing the critical engine comes into play here. Although I'm not sure if the critical engine means its the good one (its critical you keep it) or the bad one (its critical if you lose it).... -Dico |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dico" wrote in message oups.com... So with counter rotating props I won't have the plane want to go left? Or I'd really have to hammer down the right rudder? Even worse if one engine quit, I could be screwed? And I'm guessing the critical engine comes into play here. Although I'm not sure if the critical engine means its the good one (its critical you keep it) or the bad one (its critical if you lose it).... -Dico Try Googling "minimum controllable airspeed" Gerry |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dico" wrote in message oups.com... So with counter rotating props I won't have the plane want to go left? Correct. Not when they are both running, anyway! Or I'd really have to hammer down the right rudder? Even worse if one engine quit, I could be screwed? And I'm guessing the critical engine comes into play here. Although I'm not sure if the critical engine means its the good one (its critical you keep it) or the bad one (its critical if you lose it).... check this out. http://avstop.com/Technical/twins.htm Remember, too, that with a twin (except for planes like a Cessna 337) the engines are not on the centerline of the fuselage, they are offset a few feet. -Dico |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
think of the thrust line of the propeller
and for the smart guy that mentioned right foot for take off.. that's some thrust but also P-factor without counter rotating propellers, consider downward arc of prop has more thrust, left engine, downward prop is next to fuselage, right engine it is on the right side of that engine and farther from fuselage, if the left (critical) engine fails then all that thrust is way out on the right side moment arm causing yaw, and if real slow, roll factors to deal with. counter rotating propeller means the right engine the propeller rotates counter clockwise, moving that thrust line closer to the fuselage, (now same on both sides) and reduces the yaw action in the event of either engine failing.. thus negating the "critical engine" factor. You need to pick up and read a good multi engine training manual.. something by Kershner BT "Dico" wrote in message oups.com... Hello, We're looking into a twin and the Twin Comanche is on our list. I know that the later models have the counter rotating props -- although i don't know too much about what this means, other than its "better". We fly a mooney now and thus I don't worry about the prop -- as long as it keeps spinning. Is there a web site that gives a good explanation as to why I want CR props. There are hundreds of the earlier model Twin Comanches flying without the CR props --- so what does someone with 300 hours single engine time need to worry about? What actually goes wrong? And when it does, what happens? I hear "critical engine" but it means very little to me. I like to fly and try to be very careful when I do fly... but I don't follow too much aviation stuff other than how it affects me -- so I'm not exactly a "buff", hence the above questions which may seem obvious to many. Why are we looking at a Twin Comanche? Because its a twin, safer for IFR flight (perhaps this is only preceived), plus we live on the east coast on an island so we're flying over water quite a bit. Also this plane has decent speed and is an "economical" twin. We rarely fly with 4 people, so we don't need any more seats than 4. Any help or links to help would be appreciated. Thanks, Dico |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MORE critical if you loose it
consider the single engine service ceiling of most light twin aircraft, and where you would be flying it IIRC the SE service ceiling of a Twin Comanche is about 3800MSL (Density Altitude), or below the ground level of most places out here in the mid west. The second engine, on failure of the first engine, will only lead you to a landing location, not necessarily of your choosing. BT "Dico" wrote in message oups.com... So with counter rotating props I won't have the plane want to go left? Or I'd really have to hammer down the right rudder? Even worse if one engine quit, I could be screwed? And I'm guessing the critical engine comes into play here. Although I'm not sure if the critical engine means its the good one (its critical you keep it) or the bad one (its critical if you lose it).... -Dico |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Counter rotating propellers | Raoul | Military Aviation | 24 | September 21st 04 05:59 AM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Warp drive or other ground adjustable props | Wallace Berry | Home Built | 0 | March 10th 04 04:02 PM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |
Help needed - fs2004 zaps fs2002 props | Ian D | Simulators | 1 | September 11th 03 10:20 PM |