![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
After reading as much as I could find, and assembling the necessary tools, I have just started a leak testing program on my 1980 LS4. I verified that my ASI is well sealed by creating sufficent vacuum on the static input to show 100kt on ASI and observing no appreciable airspeed decrease after several minutes. After verifying the ASI, I used it to test my aft static lines. With all 4 fuselage static ports blocked with tape, I T'd my 60cc syringe into the static line, connected the assembly to the ASI and then pulled suffient negative pressure to measure 100kt on the ASI. After clamping off the syringe line I verified that the clamp worked by noting that I could no longer change the ASI reading with the syringe, and then recorded a 37kt ASI reading decrease over a 6 minute period (just over 6kt/minute) My question is, do I need to start tearing up the seat pan and tracing this line back into the fuselage, or is a 6kt/minute ASI reading decrease OK? One of the fine articles I read give a subjective threshold for 'goodness' but although the article talked about using the ASI as the mesuring instrument, the stated threshold was "20ft/minute", (I'm guessing they used the altimeter instead) ;-). TIA, Frank |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No leak is good. You should see no appreciable movement if the system
is well sealed. The rate of leakdown is a function of the total volume of the system, so it's hard to say what is OK. Static leaks are not nearly as important as pitot leaks. The cockpit pressure is close to static anyway, so a small leak has a very small effect. A pitot leak is much more troubling because it will cause your airspeed to read low. The higher the speed, the worse the error, so you can easilly exceed Vne thinking you are well below red line. It can also cause you to come in faster than expected, leading to an overshoot. To test the pitot side of the system, you need to use your syringe to pressurize the pitot. Again, you should see no appreciable movement. To fix the leaks, first make sure the tubing is still flexible. Then you need to cut off the stretched ends, and reinstall the tubes. Do not yank the tubes off because you can damage instruments like varios with the sudden pressure spike. Cut the tubes off, but do not nick the barbs. But most important, you need to install tubing clamps over the barbs. Without clamps, the tubes will leak. The best ones are the mini stainless steel pinch clamps (you can crimp these with an end nipper set of pliers). You can also use the nylon wraparound clamps, which are reusable. Tie-wraps are not suitable because they leave a gap at the right angle bend. One other thing you can try to find the leak is bubble solution. You can get plumbers bubbles from a plumbing supply or home center, or just use your kid's bubble wand stuff. Frank wrote: Hi, After reading as much as I could find, and assembling the necessary tools, I have just started a leak testing program on my 1980 LS4. I verified that my ASI is well sealed by creating sufficent vacuum on the static input to show 100kt on ASI and observing no appreciable airspeed decrease after several minutes. After verifying the ASI, I used it to test my aft static lines. With all 4 fuselage static ports blocked with tape, I T'd my 60cc syringe into the static line, connected the assembly to the ASI and then pulled suffient negative pressure to measure 100kt on the ASI. After clamping off the syringe line I verified that the clamp worked by noting that I could no longer change the ASI reading with the syringe, and then recorded a 37kt ASI reading decrease over a 6 minute period (just over 6kt/minute) My question is, do I need to start tearing up the seat pan and tracing this line back into the fuselage, or is a 6kt/minute ASI reading decrease OK? One of the fine articles I read give a subjective threshold for 'goodness' but although the article talked about using the ASI as the mesuring instrument, the stated threshold was "20ft/minute", (I'm guessing they used the altimeter instead) ;-). TIA, Frank |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Haluza" wrote in message ups.com... But most important, you need to install tubing clamps over the barbs. Without clamps, the tubes will leak. The best ones are the mini stainless steel pinch clamps (you can crimp these with an end nipper set of pliers). You can also use the nylon wraparound clamps, which are reusable. Tie-wraps are not suitable because they leave a gap at the right angle bend. Doug: Do you have a brand name or source of supply for these? Quick Google search does not yield the product you describe. Thanks Hartley Falbaum |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've found these at places like VWR, Fisher Scientific or Cole-Parmer.
Chip F |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've found these at places like VWR, Fisher Scientific or Cole-Parmer.
Chip F |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a leak testing article that I found helpful:
http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/Leaks.pdf Sure, it's commercial, but it gives a nice detailed procedure for leak testing. Note paragraphs 3 and 4 near the front. Mike recommends using rubber donuts to prevent leaks (I thinking these donuts are similar to the grommets used for feeding power cables into metal boxes). He also concurs with Doug that cable ties or twisted wire are not good for pneumatic systems. -John |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.mcmaster.com
Page 233 for pinch clamps I think one day I will just buy all of the bits needed to build my own glider from these guys - it's pretty much the default source for anything that I can imagine needing. P3 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yup, one of my goals in life is to be able to afford to call 'em and have
them ship me 6 of everything . . . Seriously, placing an order with them is a problem, 'cause there's always something you should have included in the order but forgot. When you order the pinch clamps, don't forget to get a roll of UHMW polyethylene tape. Great for anti-chafe etc. Their number is 76445A12 for the 1" wide X .0065" X 18 yds. bumper "Papa3" wrote in message oups.com... http://www.mcmaster.com Page 233 for pinch clamps I think one day I will just buy all of the bits needed to build my own glider from these guys - it's pretty much the default source for anything that I can imagine needing. P3 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jcarlyle" wrote in message
oups.com: Here's a leak testing article that I found helpful: http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/Leaks.pdf Sure, it's commercial, but it gives a nice detailed procedure for leak testing. Note paragraphs 3 and 4 near the front. Mike recommends using rubber donuts to prevent leaks (I thinking these donuts are similar to the grommets used for feeding power cables into metal boxes). He also concurs with Doug that cable ties or twisted wire are not good for pneumatic systems. -John The donuts he talks about are like "O" rings. Roll them an inch or so onto the tubing, place the tubing onto the barb then roll the donut back over the connection. This gives good sealing pressure with no voids. With good tubing and barbed connectors I have seen precious few leaks without any sort of clamps. Once the tubing gets hard then, yes, you could have a leak. If I were going to use any sort of clamps, I would use donuts. Larry "01" USA |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
those "donuts" are, in real life, used for castrating sheep (cheers to
those Australians for finding a second use for everything). however, they make great tubing clamps. they will crack after a few years exposure, but are cheap to replace. the electric wire grommets have nearly no elastic properties. Ken In article , "01-- Zero One" wrote: "jcarlyle" wrote in message oups.com: Here's a leak testing article that I found helpful: http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/Leaks.pdf Sure, it's commercial, but it gives a nice detailed procedure for leak testing. Note paragraphs 3 and 4 near the front. Mike recommends using rubber donuts to prevent leaks (I thinking these donuts are similar to the grommets used for feeding power cables into metal boxes). He also concurs with Doug that cable ties or twisted wire are not good for pneumatic systems. -John The donuts he talks about are like "O" rings. Roll them an inch or so onto the tubing, place the tubing onto the barb then roll the donut back over the connection. This gives good sealing pressure with no voids. With good tubing and barbed connectors I have seen precious few leaks without any sort of clamps. Once the tubing gets hard then, yes, you could have a leak. If I were going to use any sort of clamps, I would use donuts. Larry "01" USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
knowledge test results coming back to haunt you | chris priest | Piloting | 51 | December 8th 04 05:33 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
FAA Knowledge Test Results | Richard Moore | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 12th 03 07:10 AM |
FAA Knowledge Test Results | Richard Moore | Simulators | 3 | October 12th 03 04:48 AM |