![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TRUTH wrote:
http://physics911.net/sagadevan.htm The Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training by Nila Sagadevan Couple days after the strike I spoke with an ex-Navy Fighter pilot who knows me and my limited flying capabilities (in comparison to his) very well. I asked him if he thought I could do what the terrorists did. He said absolutely and that in fact I would do it better. He pointed out that the second pilot was flying pure pursuit on the building as evidenced by the strong bank at impact. This meant, he said, he was not taking into account wind effects, and that he knew I would as a matter of course: The second pilot had the smoke from the first hit as a perfect wind indicator but failed to use it. He almost missed. Gregg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Miss L. Toe | Piloting | 11 | February 23rd 06 02:25 PM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 12 | February 22nd 06 10:09 PM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 08:25 PM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Scott M. Kozel | Piloting | 1 | February 22nd 06 03:38 AM |