![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "TRUTH" wrote in message ... ............... In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are pathetic. You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to 9/11. Perhaps I would take more notice of your arguements if you did not automatically assume that I, being in the news group, must be a "tin foil hat" (whatever that is), "pathetic" and "stupid", etc. If you jump to that conclusion about me when you do not know a single thing about me (except that I am in this group) then I really find it hard tohave any faith in your ability to judge other issues. Insulting people is not a good way to get them on your side. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RAK" wrote in
om: "TRUTH" wrote in message ... .............. In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are pathetic. You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to 9/11. Perhaps I would take more notice of your arguements if you did not automatically assume that I, being in the news group, must be a "tin foil hat" (whatever that is), "pathetic" and "stupid", etc. If you jump to that conclusion about me when you do not know a single thing about me (except that I am in this group) then I really find it hard tohave any faith in your ability to judge other issues. Insulting people is not a good way to get them on your side. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** Don't get me wrong. Those comments by me above were directly solely to the people who already insulted, and said similar things as above to me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "TRUTH" wrote in message ... "RAK" wrote in om: "TRUTH" wrote in message ... .............. In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are pathetic. You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to 9/11. Perhaps I would take more notice of your arguements if you did not automatically assume that I, being in the news group, must be a "tin foil hat" (whatever that is), "pathetic" and "stupid", etc. If you jump to that conclusion about me when you do not know a single thing about me (except that I am in this group) then I really find it hard tohave any faith in your ability to judge other issues. Insulting people is not a good way to get them on your side. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** Don't get me wrong. Those comments by me above were directly solely to the people who already insulted, and said similar things as above to me. OK, but that was certainly not clear to me from the first message from you in a new topic/thread. Not everyone follows the history of insults in the group - it would be more than a full time job I fear! I have read some of the stuff in your links, especially links to the "straight" media. Lots of intersting stuff, but I still find it extremely hard to believe that the govt could do something so complicated (and evil) and manage to cover it up; so many people would be involved. It would be interesting to read an unbiased, balanced and competent review of the issues if there is one; most of what I see it very one-sided, one way or the other, and too much is hysterically biased. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RAK" wrote in
m: "TRUTH" wrote in message ... "RAK" wrote in om: "TRUTH" wrote in message ... .............. In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are pathetic. You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to 9/11. Perhaps I would take more notice of your arguements if you did not automatically assume that I, being in the news group, must be a "tin foil hat" (whatever that is), "pathetic" and "stupid", etc. If you jump to that conclusion about me when you do not know a single thing about me (except that I am in this group) then I really find it hard tohave any faith in your ability to judge other issues. Insulting people is not a good way to get them on your side. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** Don't get me wrong. Those comments by me above were directly solely to the people who already insulted, and said similar things as above to me. OK, but that was certainly not clear to me from the first message from you in a new topic/thread. Not everyone follows the history of insults in the group - it would be more than a full time job I fear! I have read some of the stuff in your links, especially links to the "straight" media. Lots of intersting stuff, but I still find it extremely hard to believe that the govt could do something so complicated (and evil) and manage to cover it up; so many people would be involved. It would be interesting to read an unbiased, balanced and competent review of the issues if there is one; most of what I see it very one-sided, one way or the other, and too much is hysterically biased. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** Thank you for your comments! You are definitely interesting in learning about this. 9/11 was for the purpose of building public support to invade Iraq and afghanistan. The US government has been doing this for a long time. Recently declassified tapes show that the US created terror in the Gulf of Tonkin to build public support to invade Vietnam is one example. bin Laden was trained and funded by the CIA in the 70s. Bush Sr gave WMD to Saddam in the 80s. There's interesting information here (the first link does not work though.) In particular look at the Operation Northwoods and Bush/Nazi connection http://forums.bluelemur.com/viewtopic.php?p=24588#24588 Also see he http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html Also some interesting articles: How, exactly, is the "War on Terror" helping? http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...512597,00.html http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/...036687,00.html Why Invade Afghanistan? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1840182.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2608713.stm Why invade Iraq? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...ht/4354269.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...ma/3032147.stm http://tinyurl.com/2kp45 (AMERICAN FREE PRESS) http://tinyurl.com/da23y (ABC NEWS) Bush 'plotted to lure Saddam into war with fake UN plane' http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...icle342859.ece Blair-Bush deal before Iraq war revealed in secret memo http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/...700881,00.html Ex-CIA Official Faults Use of Data on Iraq Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says http://tinyurl.com/c84fg (WASHINGTON POST) Powell's former chief of staff on Iraq intel: 'I participated in a hoax' http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Powell...f_on_0205.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK. but don't get too optimistic! There is interesting material but I still
find the whole conspiracy thing very hard to take, especially the idea that all those explosive charges could be planted with no-one noticing, and that no-one in the presumably large team involved has not gone public. I was fully aware of some of the early support for Bin Laden and Saddam, and (as a Brit who government was roughly in line with US actions) I was opposed to it at the time, having travelled in Afghanistan and Iraq previously and having at least a basic knowledge of the very dodgy people we were helping out (Gulbaddin Hekmakteyar too, however you spell it!) I shall read on when I have time but as a sceptic, far from a convert ![]() "TRUTH" wrote in message ... "RAK" wrote in m: "TRUTH" wrote in message ... "RAK" wrote in om: "TRUTH" wrote in message ... .............. ........ (cut) OK, but that was certainly not clear to me from the first message from you in a new topic/thread. Not everyone follows the history of insults in the group - it would be more than a full time job I fear! I have read some of the stuff in your links, especially links to the "straight" media. Lots of intersting stuff, but I still find it extremely hard to believe that the govt could do something so complicated (and evil) and manage to cover it up; so many people would be involved. It would be interesting to read an unbiased, balanced and competent review of the issues if there is one; most of what I see it very one-sided, one way or the other, and too much is hysterically biased. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** Thank you for your comments! You are definitely interesting in learning about this. 9/11 was for the purpose of building public support to invade Iraq and afghanistan. The US government has been doing this for a long time. Recently declassified tapes show that the US created terror in the Gulf of Tonkin to build public support to invade Vietnam is one example. bin Laden was trained and funded by the CIA in the 70s. Bush Sr gave WMD to Saddam in the 80s. There's interesting information here (the first link does not work though.) In particular look at the Operation Northwoods and Bush/Nazi connection http://forums.bluelemur.com/viewtopic.php?p=24588#24588 Also see he http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html Also some interesting articles: How, exactly, is the "War on Terror" helping? http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...512597,00.html http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/...036687,00.html Why Invade Afghanistan? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1840182.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2608713.stm Why invade Iraq? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...ht/4354269.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...ma/3032147.stm http://tinyurl.com/2kp45 (AMERICAN FREE PRESS) http://tinyurl.com/da23y (ABC NEWS) Bush 'plotted to lure Saddam into war with fake UN plane' http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...icle342859.ece Blair-Bush deal before Iraq war revealed in secret memo http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/...700881,00.html Ex-CIA Official Faults Use of Data on Iraq Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says http://tinyurl.com/c84fg (WASHINGTON POST) Powell's former chief of staff on Iraq intel: 'I participated in a hoax' http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Powell...f_on_0205.html *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RAK" wrote in
om: OK. but don't get too optimistic! There is interesting material but I still find the whole conspiracy thing very hard to take, especially the idea that all those explosive charges could be planted with no-one noticing, and that no-one in the presumably large team involved has not gone public. I was fully aware of some of the early support for Bin Laden and Saddam, and (as a Brit who government was roughly in line with US actions) I was opposed to it at the time, having travelled in Afghanistan and Iraq previously and having at least a basic knowledge of the very dodgy people we were helping out (Gulbaddin Hekmakteyar too, however you spell it!) I shall read on when I have time but as a sceptic, far from a convert ![]() Take your time. I am glad you have an open mind |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | Darkwing | Piloting | 15 | March 8th 06 01:38 AM |
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 120 | March 6th 06 02:37 AM |
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | Chad Irby | Piloting | 52 | February 28th 06 03:59 AM |
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | khobar | Piloting | 2 | February 23rd 06 09:24 PM |
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | cjcampbell | Piloting | 0 | February 23rd 06 02:51 AM |