![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On our flight to Nevada, I was impressed with the smoothness and
car-like predictability of Jim Burns' start-up technique with his Lycoming IO-540s. Jim had a way to start them that I'd not seen demonstrated before, which I will describe he 1. Fuel pump on 2. Electric primer on for (a few?) seconds 3. Crack throttle 4. With mixture at full lean, start cranking 5. Gradually enrichen the mixture until the engine fires (I may have some of this wrong, as the Aztec has nearly every switch and gauge in bizarre, usually invisible locations...) By using this method, his engines both started without cranking or coughing, just like my Subaru. So, of course, I've been experimenting with this method, which is quite different than the one described in my POH. (Which basically says "crank at full-rich"...) It has worked perfectly several times, especially on hot starts, until yesterday. Yesterday, after a short stop for a piece of pie ala mode at a nearby airport, I primed a few pumps, cracked the throttle, and started cranking with the mixture at full lean. I slowly enrichened the mixture until the engine caught...at which point it ran VERY rough, and did not want to stay running. This condition continued until I LEANED the mixture back, at which point everything returned to normal. I was able to slowly enrichen back to full rich, with no further difficulty. Mag checks were normal, and the flight home -- after a very careful and prolonged run up -- was normal. What happened here? Why did this technique induce an over-rich condition? Theories, anyone? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
I also fly a C Model Aztec and use the same technique to start the engines. In my experience, the engine needs no priming via boost pump when hot, and you need to let the engine fire and run for a couple of seconds before begining to open the mixture, or you end up flooding the engine. I used to wonder if the engines needed priming or were flooded when hot. I've learned through experience that in my case, they are always on the verge of being flooded when hot. Ronnie "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... On our flight to Nevada, I was impressed with the smoothness and car-like predictability of Jim Burns' start-up technique with his Lycoming IO-540s. Jim had a way to start them that I'd not seen demonstrated before, which I will describe he 1. Fuel pump on 2. Electric primer on for (a few?) seconds 3. Crack throttle 4. With mixture at full lean, start cranking 5. Gradually enrichen the mixture until the engine fires (I may have some of this wrong, as the Aztec has nearly every switch and gauge in bizarre, usually invisible locations...) By using this method, his engines both started without cranking or coughing, just like my Subaru. So, of course, I've been experimenting with this method, which is quite different than the one described in my POH. (Which basically says "crank at full-rich"...) It has worked perfectly several times, especially on hot starts, until yesterday. Yesterday, after a short stop for a piece of pie ala mode at a nearby airport, I primed a few pumps, cracked the throttle, and started cranking with the mixture at full lean. I slowly enrichened the mixture until the engine caught...at which point it ran VERY rough, and did not want to stay running. This condition continued until I LEANED the mixture back, at which point everything returned to normal. I was able to slowly enrichen back to full rich, with no further difficulty. Mag checks were normal, and the flight home -- after a very careful and prolonged run up -- was normal. What happened here? Why did this technique induce an over-rich condition? Theories, anyone? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
I also fly a C Model Aztec and use the same technique to start the engines. In my experience, the engine needs no priming via boost pump when hot, and you need to let the engine fire and run for a couple of seconds before begining to open the mixture, or you end up flooding the engine. I used to wonder if the engines needed priming or were flooded when hot. I've learned through experience that in my case, they are always on the verge of being flooded when hot. Ronnie "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... On our flight to Nevada, I was impressed with the smoothness and car-like predictability of Jim Burns' start-up technique with his Lycoming IO-540s. Jim had a way to start them that I'd not seen demonstrated before, which I will describe he 1. Fuel pump on 2. Electric primer on for (a few?) seconds 3. Crack throttle 4. With mixture at full lean, start cranking 5. Gradually enrichen the mixture until the engine fires (I may have some of this wrong, as the Aztec has nearly every switch and gauge in bizarre, usually invisible locations...) By using this method, his engines both started without cranking or coughing, just like my Subaru. So, of course, I've been experimenting with this method, which is quite different than the one described in my POH. (Which basically says "crank at full-rich"...) It has worked perfectly several times, especially on hot starts, until yesterday. Yesterday, after a short stop for a piece of pie ala mode at a nearby airport, I primed a few pumps, cracked the throttle, and started cranking with the mixture at full lean. I slowly enrichened the mixture until the engine caught...at which point it ran VERY rough, and did not want to stay running. This condition continued until I LEANED the mixture back, at which point everything returned to normal. I was able to slowly enrichen back to full rich, with no further difficulty. Mag checks were normal, and the flight home -- after a very careful and prolonged run up -- was normal. What happened here? Why did this technique induce an over-rich condition? Theories, anyone? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
I also fly a C Model Aztec and use the same technique to start the engines. In my experience, the engine will be flooded if you run the boost pumps when hot; When not, it needs no priming. In addition, you need to let the engine fire and run for a couple of seconds before begining to open the mixture, or you end up with the engine flooded even with no prime. I used to wonder if the engines needed priming or were flooded when hot. I've learned through experience that in my case, they are always on the verge of being flooded when hot. Is your Pathfinder fuel injected? Ronnie "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... On our flight to Nevada, I was impressed with the smoothness and car-like predictability of Jim Burns' start-up technique with his Lycoming IO-540s. Jim had a way to start them that I'd not seen demonstrated before, which I will describe he 1. Fuel pump on 2. Electric primer on for (a few?) seconds 3. Crack throttle 4. With mixture at full lean, start cranking 5. Gradually enrichen the mixture until the engine fires (I may have some of this wrong, as the Aztec has nearly every switch and gauge in bizarre, usually invisible locations...) By using this method, his engines both started without cranking or coughing, just like my Subaru. So, of course, I've been experimenting with this method, which is quite different than the one described in my POH. (Which basically says "crank at full-rich"...) It has worked perfectly several times, especially on hot starts, until yesterday. Yesterday, after a short stop for a piece of pie ala mode at a nearby airport, I primed a few pumps, cracked the throttle, and started cranking with the mixture at full lean. I slowly enrichened the mixture until the engine caught...at which point it ran VERY rough, and did not want to stay running. This condition continued until I LEANED the mixture back, at which point everything returned to normal. I was able to slowly enrichen back to full rich, with no further difficulty. Mag checks were normal, and the flight home -- after a very careful and prolonged run up -- was normal. What happened here? Why did this technique induce an over-rich condition? Theories, anyone? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You "primed a few pumps", I take it this means throttle pumping (accelerator
pumps?) on an already hot engine? I'd guess you did over prime and then flood the engine.. I am not sure of your engine but I presume it is also an IO-540? Always follow the POH or manufactures recommendations for your aircraft or configuration, the Aztruck may not have the same throttle body or injectors that you have. On our Pawnee O-540, 250HP, no "injection", on a warm engine, one throttle pump with the mixture full rich and back up to 1/2 throttle, left mag on and hit the starter, starts in two blades reduce power and bring the right mag online. I always shut down with mixture to idle cut off. Others tend to prefer to run at idle and kill the mags for engine shut down, then they touch nothing on restart but mags and starter, and it starts right up. I've also seen raw fuel drain from the carb on their shut down technique. On the Seneca II, the "book procedure" (cold engine) is mixture full rich, throttle to 1/2. Electric primers to stabilize fuel pressure (about 4 seconds), release the primer and hit the starter, very smooth start. I've found at higher airport altitudes and within an hour of landing, engine still hot, this can tend to over prime or flood the engine very easily. But then it's to the "flooded engine check list". I had one airplane that was always hard to start... so when in doubt, flood it and then do the flooded engine start.. worked every time.. because at least then you knew what you were dealing with. BT "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... On our flight to Nevada, I was impressed with the smoothness and car-like predictability of Jim Burns' start-up technique with his Lycoming IO-540s. Jim had a way to start them that I'd not seen demonstrated before, which I will describe he 1. Fuel pump on 2. Electric primer on for (a few?) seconds 3. Crack throttle 4. With mixture at full lean, start cranking 5. Gradually enrichen the mixture until the engine fires (I may have some of this wrong, as the Aztec has nearly every switch and gauge in bizarre, usually invisible locations...) By using this method, his engines both started without cranking or coughing, just like my Subaru. So, of course, I've been experimenting with this method, which is quite different than the one described in my POH. (Which basically says "crank at full-rich"...) It has worked perfectly several times, especially on hot starts, until yesterday. Yesterday, after a short stop for a piece of pie ala mode at a nearby airport, I primed a few pumps, cracked the throttle, and started cranking with the mixture at full lean. I slowly enrichened the mixture until the engine caught...at which point it ran VERY rough, and did not want to stay running. This condition continued until I LEANED the mixture back, at which point everything returned to normal. I was able to slowly enrichen back to full rich, with no further difficulty. Mag checks were normal, and the flight home -- after a very careful and prolonged run up -- was normal. What happened here? Why did this technique induce an over-rich condition? Theories, anyone? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With my Super Viking, Continental IO520-D, I used a similar method to
Jim's... Was able to hot start within 3 blades 99% of the time... And likewise, you couldn't slam the mixture to full rich or it would flood, you advanced it gently feeling the engine getting smoother or rougher as you went and reacting appropriately... Also flew a D model Aztec heavily during those years.. Same method, same results... Once you know your engines you can almost 'feel' how much or how little to prime... Flooding the engine and then pumping down is the most likely way to run down the battery, melt the solder in the starter, and leave the pilot in a swearing heap, so of course it is the recommended method in the POH... denny |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: On our Pawnee O-540, 250HP, no "injection", on a warm engine, one throttle
: pump with the mixture full rich and back up to 1/2 throttle, left mag on and : hit the starter, starts in two blades reduce power and bring the right mag : online. I always shut down with mixture to idle cut off. Others tend to : prefer to run at idle and kill the mags for engine shut down, then they : touch nothing on restart but mags and starter, and it starts right up. I've : also seen raw fuel drain from the carb on their shut down technique. In general, it's a bad idea to use the throttle pump to "prime" an engine. The accelerator pump squirts a surprisingly robust stream of raw fuel straight up (assuming carb-on-bottom-of-oil-pan arrangement). Unless the engine is being cranked, that fuel will *immediately* drip straight back down to the carb, do no good for priming, and create a fire hazzard under the cowling. On a quick-turn with a hot engine (O-360 in my case), I'll do the throttle-pump (once or twice), but ONLY while cranking the engine. The squirt of the accel pump presumably will hit the bottom of the oil pan, partially atomize, and get sucked into the cylinders. Even that is not as fast/reliable as the primer, which injects directly at the intake valve on all cylinders. ...just food for thought. Whatever floats your 'scope. -Cory ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with Ronnie and Denny, hot starts in the Aztec do not require any
priming. I showed this method to one of our partners the other day and he was happily surprised at how easy it started. It's simply a matter of obtaining the correct mixture for combustion, hot/thin air requires very little fuel, add fuel and the mixture is too rich. The "fuel pump on, then off, full open throttle, full lean mixture, crank until your battery, starter, patience are all worn out" POH method simply sucks. It also recommends starting the left engine first (carry over from when only the left had a generator) but we usually start the right first, it's closer to the battery, then we've got an alternator to help the battery send adequate amps through the 20 some feet of aluminum cable over to the left engine. The POH is usually the "bible" but when the airplane changes and the POH doesn't, it can really muck you up. I typically can tell when the engines are about to fire, then I begin advancing the mixture, but not too fast or it will kill the engine. It's a matter of feeding the engine just enough fuel so the engine driven fuel pump can keep it running. The flight school that I used to work with had an Archer that students routinely had trouble starting, they flooded it continually. They'd come back into the office saying that "they did the hot start method, then flooded method, now it barely cranks." I'd show them that when hot, it started best with the mixture pulled back about 1/2 way, not as the POH advised. One thing that aggressive ground leaning can teach is just how lean a hot engine will run. After a flight, while you're taxiing in, lean the engine so it will barely run, then enrichen slightly. Make a note of where the mixture lever is. The engine should start when hot at this same mixture setting without flooding. YMMV but once you learn the engine it won't vary very much. Jim |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
On our flight to Nevada, I was impressed with the smoothness and car-like predictability of Jim Burns' start-up technique with his Lycoming IO-540s. Jim had a way to start them that I'd not seen demonstrated before, which I will describe he 1. Fuel pump on 2. Electric primer on for (a few?) seconds 3. Crack throttle 4. With mixture at full lean, start cranking 5. Gradually enrichen the mixture until the engine fires (I may have some of this wrong, as the Aztec has nearly every switch and gauge in bizarre, usually invisible locations...) By using this method, his engines both started without cranking or coughing, just like my Subaru. So, of course, I've been experimenting with this method, which is quite different than the one described in my POH. (Which basically says "crank at full-rich"...) It has worked perfectly several times, especially on hot starts, until yesterday. .... but your engine is carbureted, is it not? .... and Jims' are fuel-injected? .... and Jim's POH specifies this starting procedure? .... and your POH specifies a different procedure? I question the wisdom of copying someone else's starting procedure just because it works well on their engine. If you have the same engine, well, nevermind. Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... On our flight to Nevada, I was impressed with the smoothness and car-like predictability of Jim Burns' start-up technique with his Lycoming IO-540s. Jim had a way to start them that I'd not seen demonstrated before, which I will describe he 1. Fuel pump on 2. Electric primer on for (a few?) seconds 3. Crack throttle 4. With mixture at full lean, start cranking 5. Gradually enrichen the mixture until the engine fires Works on the TCM IO-550 including the TN version. BTW, If the mixture is already full rich, how do you enrich it further? -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange Vibrations | Al Gilson | Owning | 16 | May 13th 05 08:55 PM |
Strange engine event | Paul Mennen | Owning | 33 | July 9th 04 03:42 AM |
Strange one about the 296 | kage | Piloting | 0 | June 13th 04 01:42 AM |
Strange lost-comm situation | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | May 4th 04 03:11 AM |
Really strange going-on with radios | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 3 | March 15th 04 12:52 PM |