![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:20:57 GMT, Bob Matthews wrote:
The next "concorde" will be a near orbit to destination craft. I would not hold your breath waiting for it. You will see it in a Bond movie long before you can ride one. For a flight from New York to Singapore, with a peak speed of 7,000 mph, what sort of G-forces would the passengers be subjected to? I realize that this would vary with the profile, but it sounds like the beverage cart would be a hand full. Depends on how you get there. Back of the envelope, 1/2 G of thrust would get the plane up to cruise speed in about 10 minutes. Cabin gravity would be at about 1.12 Gs total. Mind you, it'd be a pretty steep "slope". :-) If you need solid-fuel rockets to boost you to speed, of course, acceleration is a lot harder. Ron Wanttaja |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
Depends on how you get there. Back of the envelope, 1/2 G of thrust would get the plane up to cruise speed in about 10 minutes. Cabin gravity would be at about 1.12 Gs total. Mind you, it'd be a pretty steep "slope". :-) That would be no worse than a bit uncomfortable for most people. The more interesting scenario is at the other end. Negative 0.5G horizontal would probably require flipping the seats around so you face aft. The alternative would be to truss up all the pax like chickens on a spit to keep their limbs from flopping around. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 07:57:06 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
Ron Wanttaja wrote: Depends on how you get there. Back of the envelope, 1/2 G of thrust would get the plane up to cruise speed in about 10 minutes. Cabin gravity would be at about 1.12 Gs total. Mind you, it'd be a pretty steep "slope". :-) That would be no worse than a bit uncomfortable for most people. The more interesting scenario is at the other end. Negative 0.5G horizontal would probably require flipping the seats around so you face aft. The alternative would be to truss up all the pax like chickens on a spit to keep their limbs from flopping around. No, we presume the vehicle is basically re-entering at the other end. It can do that over a longer period, with lower accelerations. Probably would want the pax to be wearing shoulder harnesses, though. Ron Wanttaja |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Concorde - join the campaign | Ron Wanttaja | General Aviation | 0 | June 4th 06 05:24 PM |
Concorde - join the campaign | John Dallman | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 4th 06 02:42 PM |
Concorde - join the campaign | Mike | Piloting | 1 | June 4th 06 03:02 AM |
Concorde - join the campaign | Jim | Naval Aviation | 2 | June 3rd 06 10:27 PM |
Concorde - join the campaign | Z Goudie | Soaring | 0 | June 3rd 06 09:44 PM |