![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know what the rest of the country is experiencing, but here in
Denver the FSS recorded soaring forecast has gotten more and more infrequent over the last month, and now it not being recorded at all. I strongly suspect this is deliberate, as when I have actually contacted a briefer and asked (politely) when the forecast might be recorded I have been told "we are too busy". I guess the thought doesn't occur to the FSS that it might take 15 minutes to look at the 1200Z sounding and make a recording, where I can easily take up 15 minutes of a briefer's time when he/she has to get the information from scratch. OK - maybe a daily forecast at each FSS all over thecountry in the winter doesn't make sense, but in the middle of the high season? I suspect that the hope is that most of us simply will not bother to actually bother a briefer for the soaring data and will instead just download the Skew -T. If the FAA can document that almost nobody is asking for a briefing, then the recorded briefing will just be quietly eliminated as showing lack of interest. OK - the FAA briefing isn't totally accurate or informative (after all it only reflects the AM sounding), but it at least gives me a quick "yes, no, maybe" indication as to whether or not to even think about flying - then I can check further online sources (and look out the window!) if this seems sensible. So - it appears to me that at least in Denver a convenient service is going to be withdrawn unless our politically-savvy leaders approach the FSS/FAA and make a formal objection. Of course we could all simply request a formal briefing and drive them crazy to make the point, but I'd suggest this is neither professional nor a sensible way to go. Are others of you having the same problem? Comments? Suggestions? Neptune - Boulder CO |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The online version of the forecast seems to still be alive:
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/bou/include/...entdir=routine |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/bou/include/...product=algbou
&parentdir=routine This is what they use for most of the phone-forecast product...it is still a daily product. The BLIP's are also handy and mostly accurate. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can obtain the Denver Soaring Forecast via the following URL:
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/bou/include/...entdir=routine Having said that, during a seminar this spring of Colorado Soaring Pilots, it was generally believed that due the impact of the Colorado terrain on the weather, that the forecast above (same as the recording) was only useful if you intended to soar in the Denver Class-B airspace. Some suggested alternatives are Dr Jack's BLIPmaps (well worth the time to learn and understand and the money to subscribe): http://www.drjack.info/ Alternatively, you can obtain interactive forecasts Skew-Ts for any location at the following URL: http://rucsoundings.noaa.gov/ Rolf Hertenstein's Gliding Mentor Series book "Thermals" provides excellent information on extracting thermal forecasting information from Skew-T charts. Note that the above Skew-Ts also have forecast winds aloft present information on wind shear. Dr Jack's BLIPmaps are generated from the same base input information as the NOAA forecast Skew-Ts. I have been working with both this year at several locations in Southern Colorado and have gotten reliable data and good insights into the day's soaring weather. Dr Jack's wind information are composites of the wind thru the boundary layer. The NOAA Skew-Ts give you wind information, both velocity and direction, from the surface to well above the boundary layer. They should also be useful to determine if conditions are good for potential Wave. John Scott |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've found the FAA soaring forecasts almost worse than useless. With a
little understanding, you can download forecasts 100 times better from the web. No great loss to me. Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Neptune wrote:
...it appears to me that at least in Denver a convenient service is going to be withdrawn unless our politically-savvy leaders approach the FSS/FAA and make a formal objection. Of course we could all simply request a formal briefing and drive them crazy to make the point, but I'd suggest this is neither professional nor a sensible way to go. --- "Sec. 91.103 Preflight action. Each pilot in command shall, before beginning a flight, become familiar with all available information concerning that flight." --- Advisory Circular number AC 00-45E Date: 12/01/1999 Subject: Aviation Weather Services http://tinyurl.com/pfvdu FLIGHT SERVICE STATION (FSS) The FSS...provides more aviation weather briefing service than any other U.S Government service outlet. The FSS or AFSS provides preflight and inflight briefings, transcribed weather briefings, scheduled and unscheduled weather broadcasts, and furnishes weather support to flights in its area. As a starting point for a preflight weather briefing, a pilot may wish to listen to one of the recorded weather briefings provided by an FSS or AFSS. For a more detailed briefing, pilots can contact the FSS or AFSS directly. --- Within the DEN FSS area: 1-800-WX-BRIEF. Outside the DEN FSS area: 1-866-751-7021. Follow the touch-tone menu for the soaring weather brief. If the pre-recorded info is not available, follow the menu tree to speak with a briefer. Jack |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sec. 91.103 Preflight action. Each pilot in command shall, before beginning a flight, become familiar with all available information concerning that flight." I believe NWS office soaring forecasts have for some time been created "officially" at the request of FAA for use in FSS briefings. There has never been a formal requirement coming from FAA (or FSS) other than a simple memo between local NWS and FSS offices. What I'm trying to say here is this. NWS cannot unilaterally create specialized forecasts for a unique group like soaring pilots. It is only the FAA that sets the requirements for aviation forecasts that NWS delivers. Now... if FAA decided to include the parameters that we see in soaring forecasts as necessary to meet FAR 91.103...then NWS (probably the Aviation Weather Center) could create a suite of soaring forecast products similar to what Drl Jack has created. Germany and other countries provide such services (although for a fee). I don't know how Dr Jack would feel about having the government take over his domain of service. He has invested an enormous amount of time and technical skill in putting together a very professional and complete soaring product service. My NWS soaring forecast product at the NWS Hanford, CA web site also took a lot of time to create... but doesn't hold a candle to what Dr Jack created. If the government were to have created this... it would have used a lot of financial resources. As you all know... or should know... powers in Washington are pushing for user fees in both general and business aviation. If we (SSA) were to request that the government provide us with a complete soaring forecast service it would add justification for charging soaring and other pilots users fees. On the other hand if we support the private sector (or generous volunteers like Dr Jack) we (the U.S. soaring community) can probably do a better job of it for less money. There is one caveat. With the increased interest and use of UAVs (essentially unmanned gliders), perhaps their is a legitimate need to forecast soaring parameters (height of convective layer; turbulence intensity, CU/CB bases, boundary layer winds) for this segment of aviation. Those forecasts would be in support of the nations security and a new industry of air commerce. Government provide services might then be justified. If you are wondering what my oppinion is on who should create soaring weather forecasts (government or private sector)... keep wondering ![]() My oppinions are all my own and do not reflect the oppinions and policy of my employer. Walt, WX |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
US SSA-OLC League new for Summer 2006 Season! | Doug Haluza | Soaring | 20 | April 26th 06 03:54 PM |
Great Britain - soaring weather forecasts | Jack Glendening | Soaring | 4 | August 3rd 05 08:40 AM |
Sierra Mts. (USA) summer soaring forecasts | Jack Glendening | Soaring | 2 | May 22nd 05 02:58 PM |
Introducing NJ's Newest Soaring Club! | Jim Buckridge | Piloting | 2 | February 22nd 05 04:07 PM |