![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ignore if you will for the moment 91.13, the catch-all "careless/reckless"
provision that can getcha if you sneeze during the approach. Let's see if "idiot" was legal. What else can getcha? 91.103 might be a good start. Lessee, it starts off with a catch-all that says you have to have "all available information" regarding the flight, but it goes on to enumerate what the author of this section finds important -- weather, fuel, alternates, delays, and performance figures (takeoff and landing distances). Hmmm ... nothing about notams or VFR charts that I can see. What else? How about 91.139(c) that says that a person must operate the aircraft under the terms and provisions of the NOTAM. Since the idiot eventually worked himself into the system, and the NOTAM didn't specify that you have to have VFR charts on board, was he legal? Seems he had enough fuel. Seems he maintained VFR weather minima. His airplane didn't have any malfunctions (other than a loose nut on the microphone) evidencing improper maintenance. The NOTAM itself is rather vague. It says you MUST execute the Ripon/Fisk approach if operating VFR. It says you MUST, you are REQUIRED, and you SHALL in a lot of places in the NOTAM. As to carrying it, the wimpy "pilots are EXPECTED to ... have a copy of the NOTAM" are the words. EXPECTED. When a lot of imperatives are used along with a permissive, the general holding is that the permissive is not mandatory. Expected is a permissive. Just one little word change could have made all the difference. Do not under any circumstances misinterpret my questions to say that I thought the idiot was an exemplary specimen of aviation competence. Not on your tintype. I'm merely attempting to find something in the written documentation that we all aviate under to hang my hook on and I can't find it. Didn't have a VFR chart? Not required to have one. Didn't have the notam? Not required to have it. Will stand for a long time as how NOT to fly into Oshkosh? So long as there are computers that will reproduce audio files. Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Piloting | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Owning | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Owning | 0 | May 11th 04 10:36 PM |