![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd appreciate some guidance from the New York area folks on flying in
to Teterboro. I have to fly there for the first time next week. My typical flying is in a much more relaxed envirronment than this and I don't want to create any problems for myself or ATC. My biggest concern is who to talk to. The NY TAC states that VFR flights should contact approach even if they are operating below the floor of the Class B on initial contact. That's clear enough, but is that what actually occurs in practice? What if I am below the floor on initial contact and plan to remain below the floor for the duration of the flight? Does approach still want to hear from me? Does ATC care whether I arrive by way of the Hudson or from the west under the 1800' floor? The NY TAC requests that VFR flights departing the primary airports contact clearance delivery prior to taxiing. My interpretation of that is that they are talking about Newark, JFK and LaGuardia. It's not common practice for a VFR flight to contact CD at Teterboro is it? I appreciate any advice that you can offer. Thanks. RNR |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not from NY Area, but have flown to TEB from New England a bunch of times.
first, unless you REALLy need to go to TEB, consider an alternative. MMU or CDW. TEB is NOT GA-friendly (unless your personal aircraft burns kerosene). Fuel is VERy expensive, and the attitude of the FBO folks is not positive towards real general aviation. That said, if you do go there, plan to talk with approach and departure regardless of how you approach. With approach, be professional, sound like you know what you are doing, and they will treat you well. Even grant class B clearance. Very busy airspace - you want a code and you want to be talking with approach. On leaving, calling CD is always a good idea. Get a code, request advisories, and let 'em know you want a class B clearance. The floor is low in that area, and unless you like flying over very populated areas at 1800 feet, get a clearance to get some altitude. "RNR" wrote in message ... I'd appreciate some guidance from the New York area folks on flying in to Teterboro. I have to fly there for the first time next week. My typical flying is in a much more relaxed envirronment than this and I don't want to create any problems for myself or ATC. My biggest concern is who to talk to. The NY TAC states that VFR flights should contact approach even if they are operating below the floor of the Class B on initial contact. That's clear enough, but is that what actually occurs in practice? What if I am below the floor on initial contact and plan to remain below the floor for the duration of the flight? Does approach still want to hear from me? Does ATC care whether I arrive by way of the Hudson or from the west under the 1800' floor? The NY TAC requests that VFR flights departing the primary airports contact clearance delivery prior to taxiing. My interpretation of that is that they are talking about Newark, JFK and LaGuardia. It's not common practice for a VFR flight to contact CD at Teterboro is it? I appreciate any advice that you can offer. Thanks. RNR |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:22:29 +0000, pgbnh wrote:
MMU or CDW. Mac Dan at CDW rents cars. There's also KLDJ, which is just a quick taxi from a quick train into Manhattan. Fuel is going to be expensive at any of these airports, though TEB is in a class by itself. There are numerous [small] airports in the neighborhood that have cheaper fuel. [...] That said, if you do go there, plan to talk with approach and departure regardless of how you approach. With approach, be professional, sound like you know what you are doing, and they will treat you well. Even grant class B clearance. Very busy airspace - you want a code and you want to be talking with approach. TEB tower wants everyone under positive control, so you will be coded. I've never been there on 1200. The ideal is to have flight following (assuming VFR, which seems to be the assumption) from farther out, which makes everything a smooth and easy transition. - Andrew |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:22:29 GMT, "pgbnh" wrote:
Not from NY Area, but have flown to TEB from New England a bunch of times. first, unless you REALLy need to go to TEB, consider an alternative. MMU or CDW. TEB is NOT GA-friendly (unless your personal aircraft burns kerosene). Fuel is VERy expensive, and the attitude of the FBO folks is not positive towards real general aviation. That said, if you do go there, plan to talk with approach and departure regardless of how you approach. With approach, be professional, sound like you know what you are doing, and they will treat you well. Even grant class B clearance. Very busy airspace - you want a code and you want to be talking with approach. On leaving, calling CD is always a good idea. Get a code, request advisories, and let 'em know you want a class B clearance. The floor is low in that area, and unless you like flying over very populated areas at 1800 feet, get a clearance to get some altitude. Thanks for the info. I had heard that they weren't very piston-friendly. I'm trying to avoid this, but if I have to go to TEB I'll certainly follow your advice. Thanks again. RNR |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sorry to read these postings about TEB. I flew a Cherokee into
(and back out of) TEB quite a few times, about twenty years ago, and was treated very well. vince norris |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"vincent p. norris" wrote:
I'm sorry to read these postings about TEB. I flew a Cherokee into (and back out of) TEB quite a few times, about twenty years ago, and was treated very well. In my experience of flying a single engine Bonanza into TEB several times over the summer and fall of 2004, I have to say that any *prepared* pilot (read: very adept at ATC comms, very familiar with the TEB airport diagram, very familiar with TEB's departure procedures, and very familiar with all airspaces surrounding TEB) is treated very well, or at least openly, by NY ATC, TEB ATC, and the TEB FBOs. Granted that fuel and parking prices are off the charts there compared to the average FBO, but in my opinion this alone does not necessarily make TEB unfriendly to small, GA aircraft. Heck, there is (last I knew) a flight school with several small C15x's and 172s located right near Millionare. That should account for something. -- Peter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heck, there is (last I knew) a flight
school with several small C15x's and 172s located right near Millionare. That should account for something. I got my instrument rating at "General Aviation", which became Millionaire later on. GA was well treated at that time, (mumble) years ago. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
I got my instrument rating at "General Aviation", Someone demonstrated a rather dry imagination with that FBO name. ![]() -- Peter |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I got my instrument rating at "General Aviation",
Someone demonstrated a rather dry imagination with that FBO name. ![]() Or some marketing smarts. There is a company called "the phone company", and during the AT&T breakup they somehow got the salespeople to ask if they wanted "the phone company" to handle their long distance calls. Results were predictable. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
Jose wrote: I got my instrument rating at "General Aviation", Someone demonstrated a rather dry imagination with that FBO name. ![]() I dunno, I think that is very imaginative marketing. If you have have several FBOs on field and someone asks for the generic "general aviation" terminal... :-) Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying on the Cheap - Instruments | [email protected] | Home Built | 24 | February 27th 06 02:30 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Passing of Richard Miller | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | April 5th 05 01:54 AM |
Mountain Flying Course: Colorado, Apr, Jun, Aug 2005 | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | April 3rd 05 08:48 PM |
ADV: CPA Mountain Flying Course 2004 Dates | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | February 13th 04 04:30 AM |