![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() B A R R Y wrote: ... Those of you who say good ANR is a waste of money must already be deaf. For those of you that have made the leap, use your old set again one of these days! G One of my cheapo passive headsets that I use for the 3d passenger recently died (in one ear). I'm toying with the idea of getting an ANR set to replace it (for me, of course, and the others all get relegated to passenger use). I've only sampled the effects of ANR in my avionics shop, when the owner had me try it in the shop one day "just for fun" (good active selling technique). It's nice, very nice...but my question is this : I like to hear the engine just a bit since a little change in the sound or hiccup can signal an upcoming problem of potentially serious consequence, and gets my attention very fast. How well do the ANR sets let me hear a little engine sound for peace of mind? The cost of a decent ANR set is significantly more than a very good passive set, and I just don't want to give up safety for comfort/convenience. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well come and fly with me tomorrow, I'll let you try mine. Bring
whatever you have and you can try my Bose(latest generation) and the Lightspeed QFR XCc. Meet me at T hangar number 4 at 8:45 am. skym wrote: B A R R Y wrote: ... Those of you who say good ANR is a waste of money must already be deaf. For those of you that have made the leap, use your old set again one of these days! G One of my cheapo passive headsets that I use for the 3d passenger recently died (in one ear). I'm toying with the idea of getting an ANR set to replace it (for me, of course, and the others all get relegated to passenger use). I've only sampled the effects of ANR in my avionics shop, when the owner had me try it in the shop one day "just for fun" (good active selling technique). It's nice, very nice...but my question is this : I like to hear the engine just a bit since a little change in the sound or hiccup can signal an upcoming problem of potentially serious consequence, and gets my attention very fast. How well do the ANR sets let me hear a little engine sound for peace of mind? The cost of a decent ANR set is significantly more than a very good passive set, and I just don't want to give up safety for comfort/convenience. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "skym" wrote I like to hear the engine just a bit since a little change in the sound or hiccup can signal an upcoming problem of potentially serious consequence, and gets my attention very fast. How well do the ANR sets let me hear a little engine sound for peace of mind? The cost of a decent ANR set is significantly more than a very good passive set, and I just don't want to give up safety for comfort/convenience. You: a) don't read the group very much b) don't believe what others have written on this subject c) don't have good reading comprehension or retention. g All kidding aside, I can't recall anyone posting on this exact subject "*ever* saying anything OTHER than the fact that they can hear changes in the engine much, much better than they ever could before, comparing this fact with either passive headsets, or to wearing no hearing protection. Get them. Lost hearing can not ever be replaced, and take it from me - being half deaf, kinda sucks! Tinitus- the constant ringing in your ears -which I also have- also does not go away. Mine is *as loud* as a conversation spoken at normal volumes, perhaps from only across a medium sized room. Hearing aids don't even help that. All you can do is turn them up loud enough to drown out the multiple pitched ringing noise in your head. You are never too young to protect your back, and your hearing. I dearly wish someone had impressed those facts to me, loudly and often, when I was young. -- Jim in NC -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Morgans" wrote: You are never too young to protect your back, and your hearing. I dearly wish someone had impressed those facts to me, loudly and often, when I was young. There is zero evidence that ANR does anything to prevent hearing loss over and above a good passive headset. If you can't cite clinical data to substantiate such an important claim, it it quite irresponsible to make such a claim. JKG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
B A R R Y wrote: Trust me... You hear EVERYTHING, only better. The "ANR will hide a problem" is a total fallacy, spread by the unknowing. um, I didn't notice the open door on my cherokee until I was wondering about the excess breeze. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Goodish" wrote There is zero evidence that ANR does anything to prevent hearing loss over and above a good passive headset. If you can't cite clinical data to substantiate such an important claim, it it quite irresponsible to make such a claim. Simply because ANR has not been around long enough for any long term studies to have taken place. If the total decibel reduction ratings are higher for an ANR unit versus a passive unit, would that not be a pretty darn good reason to believe that they will result in less hearing loss? How about the fact that ANR users report being able to hear com traffic much more clearly? What happens if you can not hear ATC clearly? Most would turn up the volume, so they can make the conversation out against the background noise. The loud com blaring in the ears would be another cause of hearing loss that is not ever even factored into the decibel ratings of headsets. I think that it is just as irresponsible or more irresponsible to make claims or imply that passive is just as good as ANR, when there are no long term studies to show that they are equal to the protection that ANR provides. -- Jim in NC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
skym wrote:
question is this : I like to hear the engine just a bit since a little change in the sound or hiccup can signal an upcoming problem of potentially serious consequence, and gets my attention very fast. How well do the ANR sets let me hear a little engine sound for peace of mind? a heck of a lot better than a passive headset; anything which is not the usual drone can be heard a lot clearer, and you'll be less likely to miss it; besides, at the end of a long flight, you'll be less likely to be tired and more likely to deal with the snag correctly (IMHO and all that) --Sylvain |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skym,
How well do the ANR sets let me hear a little engine sound for peace of mind? Very. It's a total non-issue, a made-up argument by headset companies back when they didn't have an ANR model in their line-up, and by old cots not liking any change. The cost of a decent ANR set is significantly more than a very good passive set, Not really. In fact, not at all. Let's say a "very good passive set" is of the DC brand (I couldn't agree less, but...). That will set you back, what, 400, 500 bucks? For that, you'll be the proud owner of a Lightspeed 20XLc and have a 100-$-burger left. Go with a QFR XCc (or one of its pilot shop branded cousins) and you'll have two of those burgers left. "ANR is way more expensive" is just as much of a myth as "You can't hear the engine quitting with ANR". -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
B A R R Y wrote: The last time I flew with a PA-28 with an open door, I was still wearing passives, and I think I would have noticed the changes regardless of what was strapped to my head. G I've had a door open twice. The first time I had a passive headset. The second time was a few months after getting the ANR. Believe me, I was shocked that I couldn't hear that the door was open. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Morgans"
wrote: There is zero evidence that ANR does anything to prevent hearing loss over and above a good passive headset. If you can't cite clinical data to substantiate such an important claim, it it quite irresponsible to make such a claim. Simply because ANR has not been around long enough for any long term studies to have taken place. If the total decibel reduction ratings are higher for an ANR unit versus a passive unit, would that not be a pretty darn good reason to believe that they will result in less hearing loss? But if a passive unit lowers the decibels sufficiently, then the pilot won't suffer hearing loss. In that case, the better performance of the ANR won't help. (don't get me wrong - you can have my ANR headset when you pry it from my cold dead fingers). -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Update on new paint job and leather seats - Trip back home | Longworth | Piloting | 6 | November 21st 05 06:52 PM |
A chance to give something back | Jack Allison | Piloting | 14 | October 23rd 05 11:41 PM |
KVUO to KAST & Back IFR 1.8 Act. 2.7 Total "First In Act. IFR X-C" | NW_PILOT | Piloting | 20 | June 29th 05 04:27 AM |
Interesting. Life history of John Lear (Bill's son) | Big John | Piloting | 7 | September 20th 04 05:24 PM |
Student Pilot Stories Wanted | Greg Burkhart | Piloting | 6 | September 18th 03 08:57 PM |