![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting article on Aviation Week's website.
http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/new.../accid0906.xml I've always maintained that GA's accident record could be significantly improved if there was an effective "wash-out" process that removed the "sludge" at the bottom of the barrel so-to-speak. This article eludes to that line of thinking. I'm not a subscriber to AWST anymore so the article is free. It's too long to post though. Enjoy. Marco |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always maintained that GA's accident record could be significantly
improved if there was an effective "wash-out" process that removed the "sludge" at the bottom of the barrel so-to-speak. This article eludes to that line of thinking. Interesting that they list "thrill-seeking" as an important risk factor. Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know what the accident statistics are for airshow performers? These guys are the ultimate thrill seekers, and it seems that a fair number of them die each year... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know what the accident statistics are for airshow performers? These guys are the ultimate thrill seekers, and it seems that a fair number of them die each year... No idea, but it seems to me that these individuals are at the top of their flying game, not at the bottom, and therefore probably have a lower rate of accidents than the average GA pilot. -- Peter |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... I've always maintained that GA's accident record could be significantly improved if there was an effective "wash-out" process that removed the "sludge" at the bottom of the barrel so-to-speak. This article eludes to that line of thinking. Interesting that they list "thrill-seeking" as an important risk factor. Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know what the accident statistics are for airshow performers? These guys are the ultimate thrill seekers, and it seems that a fair number of them die each year... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" I would never call an air show performer a "thrill seeker." Ok, it's a very weird comparison, but if you've ever seen the "Drunk Clown on the High Wire" act at a circus, the person in the clown suit is a world-class traditional high-wire walker who dresses like a clown and not a clown who just goes up to try to walk the high wire. (In my warped brain, it makes sense...YMMV) People like Sean Tucker, Patty Wagstaff, etc. are the world-class high wire walkers who can go up and "act like clowns" because they know their equipment and their personal limits down to the nth degree. These types of people are not "thrill seekers" they are professionals. Just my $0.02 worth... Jay B |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know what the accident statistics are for airshow performers? These guys are the ultimate thrill seekers, and it seems that a fair number of them die each year... Something like one out of 100 die each year. Airshow performance is the most dangerous civilian flying there is. The problem is that pleasure flying is second, ahead even of cropdusting. The article is interesting, but does not match my experience. The people I know who have had the highest ratio of accidents to hours flown (really a much better measure than total accidents, don't you agree?) were VERY focused on complying with rules and following checklists. Both seemed to average something less than 300 hours between accidents, managing to rack up 4 apiece without getting into 4 digits. Of course that's rare. Most people I know who do have accidents only have one, and the majority have none. One can happen to anyone, and I'm tempted to dismiss one accident in thousands of hours of flying as just par for the course. Still, if I had to find the one big factor that most of the pilots I know who had accidents had in common, and that was rare in the ones that didn't, it would be this - almost half of those who had accidents (including one of the two who managed 4) were aviation safety counselors, and the vast majority of pilots I know are NOT safety counselors. Even more damning, most of the aviation safety counselors I know have had accidents without racking up thousands of hours. Michael |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... I've always maintained that GA's accident record could be significantly improved if there was an effective "wash-out" process that removed the "sludge" at the bottom of the barrel so-to-speak. This article eludes to that line of thinking. Interesting that they list "thrill-seeking" as an important risk factor. And they are not kidding. We had a local flying family which lost the father and his two sons in accidents which happend during risky maneuvers.. Son #1 died performing a buzz job and low level aerobatics in a T-28. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...13X24837&key=1 Son #2 died attempting to fly his Piper Cub under an overpass. I was unable to find the NTSB report, so there is a possibility of an incorrect memory on my part. The dad died when his T-37 ate the prop of a B-26 during a close pass. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...12X17161&key=2 This family was based in my local area. The "old hands" around the airport can relate story after story about the family's antics. Unfortunately, the stories ended when the last pilot in the family (the dad) had his final accident. There were definately patterns of behavior involved. I try and follow a pattern of managing risk by not doing stupid things, keeping the aircraft well maintained, and flying in weather that is within the capabilities of my airplane and its pilot (me). Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know what the accident statistics are for airshow performers? These guys are the ultimate thrill seekers, and it seems that a fair number of them die each year... You're right, there are a handfull of airshow performer accidents every year, but, in my opinion, the warbirds have a worse record. Considering how few WWII combat aircraft are still airworthy, how little they are flown, and the high level of experience most of the warbird pilots have, there are a surprising number of accidents - more than a few of them weather related. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" KB |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Air Show pilots have the added problem of operating the airplane at close
proximity to the ground and at maximum performance as well in that environment. This alone changes the risk factor. The best demonstration pilots walk a middle road between conservative and aggressive flying. In demonstration work, you need to be a little of both, but not heavy on either end. Its a difficult and highly specialized business and we do lose people in this scenario. The real killer is that there is often just no time to correct an error. If the error is made, it simply kills you. Mechanical failure the same thing; no time. If you add it all up, what keeps you alive in the demonstration venue in aviation is the same thing that keeps you alive as an ordinary pilot. You prepare; you practice; you try to know your personal limits and don't exceed them; and most of all, you never stop learning. As for the "thrill seeker" thing; its true that many in the business enjoy the "thrills". The trick is to enjoy them without losing track of reality. Come to think of it, this fits just about all of us who fly, whether we do it right side up or upside down :-) I lasted fifty years without a scratch, flying God knows how many different types of airplanes in several venues including demonstration. During this period, I lost 32 of my friends and associates to air show related accidents. Considering the talent and expertise of these people, I think I can safely say that along with what I've mentioned above, perhaps the good Lord might have been looking out for me a bit. Some people call it good luck. I think it might go a bit deeper than that :-) Dudley "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... I've always maintained that GA's accident record could be significantly improved if there was an effective "wash-out" process that removed the "sludge" at the bottom of the barrel so-to-speak. This article eludes to that line of thinking. Interesting that they list "thrill-seeking" as an important risk factor. Slightly off-topic, but does anyone know what the accident statistics are for airshow performers? These guys are the ultimate thrill seekers, and it seems that a fair number of them die each year... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As for the "thrill seeker" thing; its true that many in the business enjoy
the "thrills". The trick is to enjoy them without losing track of reality. Come to think of it, this fits just about all of us who fly, whether we do it right side up or upside down :-) This is absolutely true, in a very schizophrenic way. Most pilots I meet are very low key, some might say meticulous people. (There are, of course, major exceptions.) Many are introverts, and all are very intelligent, successful people. Yet, they fly their own planes. Although we all like to maintain that flying somewhere for pancakes is a simple, effortless, low-risk operation, inside we all know that the sky is unforgiving, and that we're always just a few seconds from catastrophe whenever we fly. Some of us more than others... I don't pretend to understand it...but, God help me, I love it so... ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
This is absolutely true, in a very schizophrenic way. Most pilots I meet are very low key, some might say meticulous people. (There are, of course, major exceptions.) Many are introverts, and all are very intelligent, successful people. Yet, they fly their own planes. Although we all like to maintain that flying somewhere for pancakes is a simple, effortless, low-risk operation, inside we all know that the sky is unforgiving, and that we're always just a few seconds from catastrophe whenever we fly. Some of us more than others... I don't pretend to understand it...but, God help me, I love it so... One aspect of flying that seems to attract intelligent, succcessful people is that piloting, at its core, is about grabbing hold of a [huge] responsibility and taming it. We all realize that it's not a very forgiving activity and we are constantly reminded through accident reports. But yet we thrive on our ability to handle the task at hand. Closely related to that is our ability to deal with fear. Most deal with it positively and others negatively (i.e. ignore it). Not unlike soldiers in battle, the successful pilot takes it on and uses it to their advantage. I've met a number of pilots over the years and have always been intrigued by the differing personalities. There are lots of them too. The one thing that seems to be common throughout our community can be summed up in one word: PRIDE Most pilots are proud of what they've accomplished in training and with every successful flight and also proud of the aircraft they fly. They're proud of the responsibility they've taken on and managed. As a big driver of success, it's no wonder that there are so many "successful" folks that take up flying. It's why pilots as a group are very patriotic. Marco |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: I don't pretend to understand it...but, God help me, I love it so... That sums it up for me. It's the desire of my heart. I don't see it as thrilling, but as soothing. I suppose in another era it would have been something else, but I can't imagine what. -- Gene Seibel Tales of Flight - http://pad39a.com/gene/tales.html Because I fly, I envy no one. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
About Good Pilots and Bad Pilots | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 96 | February 23rd 06 01:19 AM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 72 | April 30th 04 11:28 PM |