![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter wrote:
This has just been released. Well done to all those who lobbied. .... snipped If you haven't already done so you may enjoy reading this recent report on the CAA by the Transport Select Committee (note comments on EASA): http://www.publications.parliament.u...an/809/809.pdf Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter wrote:
NoSpam wrote: If you haven't already done so you may enjoy reading this recent report on the CAA by the Transport Select Committee (note comments on EASA): http://www.publications.parliament.u...an/809/809.pdf That is a 360 page document; presumably you are thinking of this snippet Relationship with the Department for Transport 21. Several witnesses told us there was a need for a greater degree of integration and coordination between the CAA and the Department for Transport. The Airport Operators Association told us that, in conducting a recent consultation on bringing foreign-registered aircraft into the UK, the Department had failed to discuss the likely costs of the associated regulatory requirements with the CAA, and had therefore estimated the cost to be £0.25 million when the real cost was more likely to be “in the order of tens of millions of pounds.”32 It argued that it was important both that CAA specialists were given the opportunity to contribute to Government thinking, and that Department officials had a thorough understanding of the CAA’s regulatory approach and practice. It called for greater efforts towards joint working and the earlier involvement of the CAA in policymaking. Since the CAA makes a big thing of being a consultant to the UK Govt on all aviation matters, what happened here? I don't think the CAA can wash its hands of this one and just blame the DfT. They *brief* the DfT. It was pages 55-59 (and the conclusions) that caught my eye, but somewhere they're fairly scathing about EASA and suggest that no further handover of responsibility should occur until the EASA problems are resolved (can't recall exact words or location but they leapt out when I scanned through it.) Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |