![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does any one know of a flyable C-337 ?
Thx... Mike. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Capt. Mike wrote:
Does any one know of a flyable C-337 ? Thx... Mike. We have five of them but you can't have them. ;-) What are you really looking for? Michelle P |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Capt. Mike" wrote in message Does any one know of a flyable C-337 ?
Trying to find the elusive replacement propeller blade? I had a -337 in the early 90's but gave up on it. D. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Were any ever really flyable?
"Capt. Mike" wrote in message ... | Does any one know of a flyable C-337 ? | | Thx... | | Mike. | | |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:09:01 -0600, in
, Jim Macklin wrote: Were any ever really flyable? As much so as any other Cessna... ducking-and-running |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Capt. Mike wrote:
Does any one know of a flyable C-337 ? Thx... Mike. Lane Aviation at CMH has one for sale 88K$ |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Parts should be available. The USAF liked the O2, but it
made a lousy seaplane, the water ate up the rear prop. "Greg Farris" wrote in message ... | In article , | says... | | | Were any ever really flyable? | | | | Oh come on! | Admittedly, it was more of an "engineer's" airplane than a "pilot's" | airplane - A deaf engineer at that!! | | But Adam aircraft have (re) proven the validity of it. | | GF | |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
That wasn't a 337...................a 336
Karl "Curator" N185KG "Jim Macklin" wrote in message ... Parts should be available. The USAF liked the O2, but it made a lousy seaplane, the water ate up the rear prop. "Greg Farris" wrote in message ... | In article , | says... | | | Were any ever really flyable? | | | | Oh come on! | Admittedly, it was more of an "engineer's" airplane than a "pilot's" | airplane - A deaf engineer at that!! | | But Adam aircraft have (re) proven the validity of it. | | GF | |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is true, but the airplane was just as much a commercial
failure, the vast majority of the production was as military O2 FAC planes. "karl gruber" wrote in message ... | That wasn't a 337...................a 336 | | | Karl | "Curator" N185KG | | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | ... | Parts should be available. The USAF liked the O2, but it | made a lousy seaplane, the water ate up the rear prop. | | | | "Greg Farris" wrote in message | ... | | In article , | | says... | | | | | | Were any ever really flyable? | | | | | | | | Oh come on! | | Admittedly, it was more of an "engineer's" airplane than a | "pilot's" | | airplane - A deaf engineer at that!! | | | | But Adam aircraft have (re) proven the validity of it. | | | | GF | | | | | | |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 04:40 PM |
| Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 05:40 AM |
| Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 03:37 AM |
| Wow - heard on the air... (long) | Nathan Young | Piloting | 68 | July 25th 05 07:51 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |