![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I buy an older plane that qualifies for Sport Aviation (e.g. less than
1300 lbs), but was certified "Utility", do I need any paper work to fly it under Sport. Also, I have a private with an expired medical. Do I need to do any paperwork or do I need to take any certification flights to fly under Sport Aviation? Danny Dot |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Danny Dot wrote: If I buy an older plane that qualifies for Sport Aviation (e.g. less than 1300 lbs), but was certified "Utility", do I need any paper work to fly it under Sport. No. Also, I have a private with an expired medical. Do I need to do any paperwork or do I need to take any certification flights to fly under Sport Aviation? No, you're good to go. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote
Also, I have a private with an expired medical. Do I need to do any paperwork or do I need to take any certification flights to fly under Sport Aviation? No, you're good to go. How about a Flight Review.....61.56. Bob Moore |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote in message . .. Danny Dot wrote: If I buy an older plane that qualifies for Sport Aviation (e.g. less than 1300 lbs), but was certified "Utility", do I need any paper work to fly it under Sport. No. Also, I have a private with an expired medical. Do I need to do any paperwork or do I need to take any certification flights to fly under Sport Aviation? No, you're good to go. You do need to have a current flight review. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Danny Dot wrote: If I buy an older plane that qualifies for Sport Aviation (e.g. less than 1300 lbs), but was certified "Utility", do I need any paper work to fly it under Sport. The plane will continue to be a "Utility" category aircraft but qualifies to be flown by a "Sport" pilot. This is different than the new "Sport" category of aircraft which are basically Ultralights. -Robert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... Danny Dot wrote: If I buy an older plane that qualifies for Sport Aviation (e.g. less than 1300 lbs), but was certified "Utility", do I need any paper work to fly it under Sport. The plane will continue to be a "Utility" category aircraft but qualifies to be flown by a "Sport" pilot. This is different than the new "Sport" category of aircraft which are basically Ultralights. -Robert If you can call something that weighs 750 lbs empty and over 1300 lbs full an ultralight I guess you'd be right. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message news ![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote: The plane will continue to be a "Utility" category aircraft but qualifies to be flown by a "Sport" pilot. This is different than the new "Sport" category of aircraft which are basically Ultralights. If you can call something that weighs 750 lbs empty and over 1300 lbs full an ultralight I guess you'd be right. Except that you can't, because an "ultralight" would be Part 103, would have to weigh less than 254 pounds and the pilot would not need a license to fly it. The aircraft he's calling a "Sport category" (S-LSAs and E-LSAs presumably) all weigh more than that and the pilot needs a license. I guess the sarcasm didn't show quite enough in my response to who ever said, "This is different than the new "Sport" category of aircraft which are basically Ultralights." I was implying that he was wrong in calling the SLA aircraft Ultralights. That's why I put the empty and full weights in the post. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message news ![]() I knew you were implying he was wrong, and I knew you knew why he was wrong, Sorry Todd, I've spent to much time reading and responding to Anthony's post. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gig 601XL Builder wrote: "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... If you can call something that weighs 750 lbs empty and over 1300 lbs full an ultralight I guess you'd be right. Yes, basically ultralights. Many are weight shift controlled, etc. -Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... Gig 601XL Builder wrote: "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... If you can call something that weighs 750 lbs empty and over 1300 lbs full an ultralight I guess you'd be right. Yes, basically ultralights. Many are weight shift controlled, etc. -Robert Some SLAs are but the OP wasn't talking about those and nothing that is 750 lbs empty and 1300 lbs full can be an ultralight. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
How safe is it, really? | June | Piloting | 227 | December 10th 04 05:01 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |