![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've noticed stall strips installed on a number of low wing aircraft.
However I've never noticed them installed on a high wing. How come? Is there something inherent in the design of a high wing that insures the stall starts at the wing root? Or perhaps they're out there and I've just not noticed them. Cheers: Paul N1431A |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tri-Pacer wrote: I've noticed stall strips installed on a number of low wing aircraft. However I've never noticed them installed on a high wing. How come? Is there something inherent in the design of a high wing that insures the stall starts at the wing root? Or perhaps they're out there and I've just not noticed them. Cheers: Paul N1431A High wing planes don't generate enough lift to worry about. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tri-Pacer wrote:
I've noticed stall strips installed on a number of low wing aircraft. However I've never noticed them installed on a high wing. How come? Is there something inherent in the design of a high wing that insures the stall starts at the wing root? Or perhaps they're out there and I've just not noticed them. Cheers: Paul N1431A strip strips on the leading edge or a fence? We have several aircraft with a leading edge cuff. No strips. Michelle P |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tri-Pacer wrote: I've noticed stall strips installed on a number of low wing aircraft. However I've never noticed them installed on a high wing. How come? Is there something inherent in the design of a high wing that insures the stall starts at the wing root? Low wings are fatally flawed from being in the wrong place, therefore the add ons to make it fly reasonably well. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tri-Pacer wrote: I've noticed stall strips installed on a number of low wing aircraft. However I've never noticed them installed on a high wing. How come? Is there something inherent in the design of a high wing that insures the stall starts at the wing root? Or perhaps they're out there and I've just not noticed them. Cheers: Paul N1431A Don't know if this is the answer or not but high wings with struts can be rigged with washout so the roots stall before the tips and you've got some aileron authority just before the wing completely stalls. Piper Cubs, Super Cubs, 172's, 152's, and Taylorcrafts (to name a few) have ability to adjust for wing washout. You can remove washout too, and doing so will turn a Taylorcraft into a squirrelly staller. I know that from experience. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jls wrote: Don't know if this is the answer or not but high wings with struts can be rigged with washout so the roots stall before the tips and you've got some aileron authority just before the wing completely stalls. Piper Cubs, Super Cubs, 172's, 152's, and Taylorcrafts (to name a few) have ability to adjust for wing washout. You can remove washout too, and doing so will turn a Taylorcraft into a squirrelly staller. I know that from experience. A fabric-covered airplane will have two struts on each wing so that washout can be set, but an all-metal wing requires only one strut since the wing forms a torsionally-rigid box and the two struts are not necessary to keep the wing aligned. Those wings (152s, 172s, etc) have the washout built into them while being skinned at the factory and it's not adjustable. Incidence is adjustable at the root, but it's a small range of adjustment. A rectangular wing generally needs no washout because its natural stall pattern begins at the root, for reasons I'm not clear on. Tapered and elliptical wings tend to start stalling at midspan, so washout will normally be found on them. Any wing should be rigged in accordance with the aircraft's service manual. Tampering with wings to introduce washout or washin where the type design doesn't call for it (or remove whatever setting is specified) can be dangerous and create unpredictable handling. If an airplane consistently drops one particular wing in a coordinated stall, and the washin is set properly, it's more likely an incidence issue, not washout. Stall strips were used to modify stall behavior that was unacceptable during test flights of new designs. The Bonanza has them. They'll raise the stall speed, but that's better than having the wing stall toward the tips first and having some really nasty wing drops (and maybe immediate spins) or very abrupt stalls. Getting the roots to start stalling first will create turbulence over the tail, causing a warning buffet, and will often start the nose downward soon enough to prevent a full stall. Dan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Stall strips vs. Washout | [email protected] | Home Built | 27 | February 27th 05 08:59 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Proper stall recovery technique | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 0 | February 2nd 04 10:33 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |