![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey, Folks:
Grab a beer on me, I'd like to solicit some more opinions. If you've read the other thread on airplane comparisons, you know I'm shopping for an airplane. So, I have another question. This time, not how to compare airplanes, but how to make an apples-to-apples comparison (money-wise) between different specimens of the same model for sale. I've used AOPA's Vref, but it's unsatisfying in this regard for several reasons (among them, it doesn't really answer my questions below, and it's cumbersome to input different parameters to try to do so anyway; plus, there seems to be general agreement that it overvalues by around 10%?). The rest of my studies have similarly failed to completely address my questions below. Obviously, each of these will vary a little based on airplane and exact choices made, but I'm looking for a ballpark. - Engine time. Seems simple enough--divide the time on the motor by TBO and multiply by overhaul cost ($25K, I seem to be hearing? [oops! I'm trying to join this club, better get used to the jargon: make that 25AMU ![]() better), and you can compare two different time engines. Fair enough? - Avionics--the big one. Conventional wisdom seems to be to get the airplane with all the avionics in it you want, because you'll never get the same value out of buying new. OK, I'll buy that--but, at some point, the lines have to cross. To illustrate with an extreme example, assume I find an otherwise satisfactory airplane that has totally dated avionics. What's a soup-to-nuts panel cost, brand new, installed? Is 50AMU in the ballpark? Not chump change (hardly!!), of course--but, it *is* sometimes within the spread of the price ranges I see in a given model, where the primary difference appears to be the panel.... - Paint. What's a quality paint job cost? 5AMU? - Interior. What's a new interior cost? 5AMU? - Any other big valuation points I should be looking at with a similar eye? Thanks! -- Doug "Where am I to go/Now that I've gone too far?" -- Golden Earring, "Twilight Zone" (my email is spam-proofed; read the address and make the appropriate change to contact me) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Douglas Paterson" wrote: - Engine time. Seems simple enough--divide the time on the motor by TBO and multiply by overhaul cost ($25K, I seem to be hearing? [oops! I'm trying to join this club, better get used to the jargon: make that 25AMU ![]() better), and you can compare two different time engines. Fair enough? There is a fudge factor (totally guess work) to account for the type of time on the engine. Did the airplane sit for months and months between long flights? 300 hours in ten years isn't as good as 300 hours in 2-3 years. Also, some engines have a calendar time between overhauls. I didn't follow your whole thread, did anyone suggest you think about whether you want an airplane with a run-out engine (you overhaul it and know that you have a fresh overhaul), mid-time engine (will it really make TBO?), or fresh overhaul (was it a cheapo overhaul?)? I ended up buying (and paying for) an airplane with a low-time engine. It had about 300 hours on it, and only got to around 600 hours before a couple of cylinders cracked. - Avionics--the big one. Conventional wisdom seems to be to get the What's a soup-to-nuts panel cost, brand new, installed? Is 50AMU in the ballpark? What's your definition of soup-to-nuts? - Paint. What's a quality paint job cost? 5AMU? Around here, 10 AMU. - Interior. What's a new interior cost? 5AMU? and possibly more. Less if you do the work yourself. good luck -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Douglas Paterson wrote:
Hey, Folks: Grab a beer on me, I'd like to solicit some more opinions. If you've read the other thread on airplane comparisons, you know I'm shopping for an airplane. So, I have another question. This time, not how to compare airplanes, but how to make an apples-to-apples comparison (money-wise) between different specimens of the same model for sale. I've used AOPA's Vref, but it's unsatisfying in this regard for several reasons (among them, it doesn't really answer my questions below, and it's cumbersome to input different parameters to try to do so anyway; plus, there seems to be general agreement that it overvalues by around 10%?). The rest of my studies have similarly failed to completely address my questions below. Obviously, each of these will vary a little based on airplane and exact choices made, but I'm looking for a ballpark. http://www.aeroprice.com No vested interest, just a satisfied user. You can either appraise a specific aircraft for a fee, or buy their software to use yourself to appraise a specific model. Worth the small expense, IMO. Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() .stuff snipped So, I have another question. This time, not how to compare airplanes, but how to make an apples-to-apples comparison (money-wise) between different specimens of the same model for sale. .lots of stuff snipped This is the $64,000 question. Many will give some specific examples, but it should become apparent that this is a bit art and a bit of science. There are many differences between the factory planes themselves of many particular models. Paint jobs, interiors and the like are also wildly variable. Engine condition depends on several factors and not just time since major overhaul ("SMOH"). Avionics suites can have what appears to be infinite combinations. They all affect price. In order to arrive at a reasonable value, you need to look at many examples, know the various details, SEE the birds, and then know the asking and ACTUAL selling prices. This is WAY more difficult than it sounds. Geography is a big factor. How people report what they are selling is another huge variable. Finally, while the asking price is posted, you rarely get to know the actual selling price. Not only do you have to see a lot of birds, you also have to KNOW what you are looking for and what you are looking at. This takes experience. The average age of this entire fleet has surpassed 30 years. Age and a bird's history take way different tolls on them. This all affects price. The various valuation services give very general pricing based on certain assumptions, some of which they state in their service. The pricing between them can be significantly different. Many will argue about which one is more "accurate" depending on whether they are a buyer or seller and which service tells them a price they want to hear. The big complication in all this is emotion. Patience is key at the exact time when "love" trashes all reason. It may take a long time to educate yourself. Even if you know what you are looking for and have the experience, it may take a year to find that exact bird if you are inflexible and precise in your requirements/cash or that make/model is rare to begin with. Some contend that these are the very reasons you should use a broker. In theory, this is what a broker is paid to do (weed out the junkers from the cream puffs). In reality, brokers themselves are a huge variable. Since their primary incentive is moving airplanes for cash, you may not get a "good" airplane in the end. If you take someone's recommendation of which broker is "good", that in itself is a giant variable (who knows if the recommending party is credible - who knows if the bird they bought is really a junker - and on and on). Brokers themselves affect price. In the end, with experience, time, money, and good luck, you may find what appears to be EXACTLY what you are looking for. In time, you may discover whether this is true or not. Since you cannot disassemble the entire plane to inspect it, there are many opportunities for hidden defects lie in wait. Defects you discover before the sale may move the price a little or a lot. This is a big variable and it also may affect price. What's a plane worth?? Whatever someone will PAY. The most difficult thing to do is to determine the difference between a set of reasonable compromises and when to walk away. Finally, if you take the time to do it right, some impatient fool with more money than brains will likely buy the beast up from under you while you are doing the research. Because the fleet is shrinking, there are fewer and fewer choices. The market is reported to be "soft" right now. So, prices MAY be more flexible on some birds. Everyone's experience is so very different, it is hard to tell who to believe. There is no service with a guarantee (you satisfaction or your money back is NOWHERE to be found in aviation). Good Luck, Mike |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Valuing similar aircraft is not straight forward, especially so if you have not flown that make and model often. Essentially, if you have decided to buy a specific model, the most important task now is to become the dreaded tyre kicker ! Go look at every aircraft that are accessible to you, no matter the asking price, that is the only way you will build the knowledge to eventually make the decision which is right for you. Test fly as many that will allow you and pay for the fuel ! Take your digital camera and photograph every bird you look at, in detail, especially the panel. Go home and study those photographs ......... build your knowledge of that model and marks of it. When you know that make and model really well, you are ready to seriously consider dumping your cash into your very own money pit. There is a lot of junk sitting on the market, you just have to know enough to make sure you don't buy one of those. When you have gone through this process you will know which aircraft represents the condition and equipment that you are prepared to pay for. You can use all the valuation aids available, but nothing will beat having sound knowledge of the condition and equipment in the aircraft on sale and their asking prices. You already know that upgrading an aircraft with new avionics, engine work, interior and exterior work is a costly exercise. And if you go that route you will need to fly that value out of your bird. The choice for me, was easier. I had lots of hours both flying and helping to maintain Piper Archers. So an Archer would become my first airplane. What should I do though ? Buy a $95,000 Archer with decent avionics, up to half time engine and good interior etc or buy an Archer with run-out engine, and more or less as it left the Piper factory in all departments at a cost of $50,000. I chose the expensive route, I bought the $50,000 bird and have spent the last 2 years having a great time fixing it up so everything is as I want it to be. I am a mechanical engine and a licensed Radio Amateur, so have good mechanical and avionic understanding. When finished I will have about $110,000 in the bird, BUT ...... ..... It now is all new firewall forward, with a top notch engine, complete Garmin 530 Stack with Dacint RSS and all new under panel and avionic wiring. The "all leather" interior cost $7,000, and stripping and painting gets done in February at $9,000 plus. I fitted new flight control cables and Knots 2U wing tips with landing lights, gap seals and wing root fairings. And a host of other upgrades to ensure the aircraft is in the very best mechanical condition. In fact most moving parts are new. I could have just overhauled the engine, and happily flown this minimum squawk clean Archer with its factory avionics for many years. But I relished the enjoyment of planning the work, negotiating the costs and getting it all done. So I cannot get back anywhere near the $110,000 that I have spent, but it is equipped with the best, it flies really nice and will look great after the paint job. Would I go this route again ? Well if I discount buying a new aircraft, yes, I think I would do it this way again I did not want a bird sitting in the hanger which had bits and pieces thrown in by a dozen different owners who never spent the cash needed to properly gut out the old and replace it all with new. I would have had to live and maintain with what they left for me. Know the model you intend to buy really well. Know the current market prices, and eventually you will make a good decision when you buy your aircraft. -- Roy Piper Archer N5804F "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , "Douglas Paterson" wrote: - Engine time. Seems simple enough--divide the time on the motor by TBO and multiply by overhaul cost ($25K, I seem to be hearing? [oops! I'm trying to join this club, better get used to the jargon: make that 25AMU ![]() better), and you can compare two different time engines. Fair enough? There is a fudge factor (totally guess work) to account for the type of time on the engine. Did the airplane sit for months and months between long flights? 300 hours in ten years isn't as good as 300 hours in 2-3 years. Also, some engines have a calendar time between overhauls. I didn't follow your whole thread, did anyone suggest you think about whether you want an airplane with a run-out engine (you overhaul it and know that you have a fresh overhaul), mid-time engine (will it really make TBO?), or fresh overhaul (was it a cheapo overhaul?)? I ended up buying (and paying for) an airplane with a low-time engine. It had about 300 hours on it, and only got to around 600 hours before a couple of cylinders cracked. - Avionics--the big one. Conventional wisdom seems to be to get the What's a soup-to-nuts panel cost, brand new, installed? Is 50AMU in the ballpark? What's your definition of soup-to-nuts? - Paint. What's a quality paint job cost? 5AMU? Around here, 10 AMU. - Interior. What's a new interior cost? 5AMU? and possibly more. Less if you do the work yourself. good luck -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right now the airplane market is soft. You should be able to get a
plane for 20% or so below TAP (Trade a Plane) appraisal. I highly recommend you subscribe to Trade a Plane (tradeaplane.com), and learn how to use their online appraiser. This will give you the asking price in TAP. Owner ship Costs: FIXED COSTS hangar insurance annual HOURLY COSTS fuel maintenance reserves Also consider aquisition costs, tax consequences, interest rates. Buying procedu Find ad Call buyer Get tail number and do a title search If the plane sounds good over the phone but is far away, hire a mechanic and tell him to give the plane a compression test and take a look at the logs. Use AOPA airport guide or similar (airnav.com), to find a mechanic on the field that is NOT the owners mechanic. This should be about 2 hour of mechanic time. Also you might have him cut open the oil filter and take an oil sample. Negotiate a price. Visit the plane. Examine the condition. Go for a test flight. Try out all the avionics and features. Fly the plane (with the owner or an instructor). Arrange delivery (a common sticking point). Arrange payment (nothing beats wire transfer). Deposit is common. Again, make SURE you have good title (I think title insurance is worth it, just because they do a good check for leins etc). There are some escrow services. Look at the ads in TAP. Take delivery and make payment. Enjoy your airplane! As for comparing similar planes, just look at them and decide. There may be a tie. In that case make low offers on both. Someone may bite. I have heard of getting planes for as much as 50% below appraisal (the guy HAS to sell and its been on the market a looong time (like a year or so)). One thing. Ownership costs usually exceed aquisition, so try and get what you want and what you will be happy with. If you have to pay a bit extra to get what you want it is probably worth it. Dont buy a project unless you WANT a project. Airplane projects usually go way over budget by the time they are done. Good luck! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
First, you are being a bit to analytical. My thought is to be half analytical and half romantic! Money is one thing but flying is a labor of love and you will bond with your plane. I can remember when my plane (not yet mine) was at my airport in its prebuy. The owner had delivered it to my A&P. He was thinking sorta "I hope it doesn't pass so I can fly it home" and I was thinking sorta "doesn't matter, I'm buying this plane". That was 10 years ago and "we" are still a pair. I've added maybe 15AMU for electronics but so what. More directly, be interested in only those things you want to upgrade. If paint is OK (maybe a 6 or 7) and you don't mind, you don't have to repaint. Get the idea? AOPA site gives some idea of value added. Many items add little or no value but an IFR GPS will add purhaps 1/2 its cost. Still, add what you want and over time. It is your bird so fall in love and custonize it. Chuck On Jan 28, 2:01 am, "Douglas Paterson" wrote: Hey, Folks: Grab a beer on me, I'd like to solicit some more opinions. If you've read the other thread on airplane comparisons, you know I'm shopping for an airplane. So, I have another question. This time, not how to compare airplanes, but how to make an apples-to-apples comparison (money-wise) between different specimens of the same model for sale. I've used AOPA's Vref, but it's unsatisfying in this regard for several reasons (among them, it doesn't really answer my questions below, and it's cumbersome to input different parameters to try to do so anyway; plus, there seems to be general agreement that it overvalues by around 10%?). The rest of my studies have similarly failed to completely address my questions below. Obviously, each of these will vary a little based on airplane and exact choices made, but I'm looking for a ballpark. - Engine time. Seems simple enough--divide the time on the motor by TBO and multiply by overhaul cost ($25K, I seem to be hearing? [oops! I'm trying to join this club, better get used to the jargon: make that 25AMU ![]() better), and you can compare two different time engines. Fair enough? - Avionics--the big one. Conventional wisdom seems to be to get the airplane with all the avionics in it you want, because you'll never get the same value out of buying new. OK, I'll buy that--but, at some point, the lines have to cross. To illustrate with an extreme example, assume I find an otherwise satisfactory airplane that has totally dated avionics. What's a soup-to-nuts panel cost, brand new, installed? Is 50AMU in the ballpark? Not chump change (hardly!!), of course--but, it *is* sometimes within the spread of the price ranges I see in a given model, where the primary difference appears to be the panel.... - Paint. What's a quality paint job cost? 5AMU? - Interior. What's a new interior cost? 5AMU? - Any other big valuation points I should be looking at with a similar eye? Thanks! -- Doug "Where am I to go/Now that I've gone too far?" -- Golden Earring, "Twilight Zone" (my email is spam-proofed; read the address and make the appropriate change to contact me) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bob Noel wrote: and another thing... I always figured if you plan on keeping your airplane for a long time, then the benefit of fixing the way you want it outweighs the cost of the upgrades vs buying an airplane already equipped. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -----Original Message----- From: Douglas Paterson ] Posted At: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:01 AM Posted To: rec.aviation.owning Conversation: How to compare/valuation of features Subject: How to compare/valuation of features .... - Any other big valuation points I should be looking at with a similar eye? Thanks! -- Doug "Where am I to go/Now that I've gone too far?" -- Golden Earring, "Twilight Zone" (my email is spam-proofed; read the address and make the appropriate change to contact me) ADs and SBs - some of these can get real important (expensive) real fast. Foreign vs. American registry - based on earlier threads, it is almost cost prohibitive to re-register a foreign registered aircraft into the United States. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Foreign vs. American registry - based on earlier threads, it is almost cost prohibitive to re-register a foreign registered aircraft into the United States. I imported an Arrow a while back and it was pretty painless except that the wire service bank gave me a bad exchange rate quote. They fixed it later and refunded the extra $1500. I used Aeroprice extensively on my search and found it easy and helpful. Assuming ADs and SBs have been c/w, the big variable is whether the previous owner has been relaxed or anal about minor problems that eventually become major ones. Somebody on the Cherokee site a year or so ago discovered severe spar corrosion after buying a Cherokee and ended up parting out the plane, as the cost of repair exceeded the value of the aircraft. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Film Features Newsmen on World War II Combat Gliders | Pete Brown | Soaring | 0 | June 6th 06 03:04 AM |
Garmin backing away from additional GDL-69 features for 430/530 products? | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 2 | September 9th 05 11:36 PM |
New GPS Visualizer features: address mapping & GPX creation | Adam Schneider | Soaring | 0 | September 21st 04 08:33 PM |
new GPS Visualizer features: tickmarks & text entry | Adam Schneider | Soaring | 0 | April 24th 04 08:32 PM |
GPS Visualizer: new global imagery + new features | Adam Schneider | Soaring | 2 | March 18th 04 01:32 PM |