![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was planning a trip, and in addition to the standard Jepp charts, eFlyBook
(another saga), I also print out a few of the FAA charts (larger, easier to read at night, can scribble on them, etc). However, on downloading and printing a chart from the Airnav website, I noticed that they were from the last cycle, so might not be valid or current(??) Has anyone else noticed this? Are the FAA or AOPA sites any easier to access and print? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't see how it could be much easier than the FAA site
http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=naco/online/d_tpp . "Viperdoc" wrote in message ... I was planning a trip, and in addition to the standard Jepp charts, eFlyBook (another saga), I also print out a few of the FAA charts (larger, easier to read at night, can scribble on them, etc). However, on downloading and printing a chart from the Airnav website, I noticed that they were from the last cycle, so might not be valid or current(??) Has anyone else noticed this? Are the FAA or AOPA sites any easier to access and print? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Viperdoc writes:
However, on downloading and printing a chart from the Airnav website, I noticed that they were from the last cycle, so might not be valid or current(??) You're not supposed to use charts from AirNav for navigation. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Stan Prevost wrote: I don't see how it could be much easier than the FAA site http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=naco/online/d_tpp . Are there any sites that have current VFR sectionals and/or low enroute charts to print? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are there any sites that have current VFR sectionals and/or low enroute
charts to print? skyvector.com does. http://skyvector.com/#16-15-3-2886-2532 is the Danbury area. http://www.flying20club.org/library.html has a few other interesting sites. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kingfish writes:
Are there any sites that have current VFR sectionals and/or low enroute charts to print? SkyVector is a Google-Map-like service that lets you examine U.S. VFR charts (sectionals and TACs) online, but it is not intended for use in real-world navigation (however, the charts are current): http://www.skyvector.com I don't know of a source for online IFR charts, but if there is one, I'd like to hear about it. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since when? Besides, I only simulate flying in my real Baron.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Viperdoc writes:
Since when? Since always. There are disclaimers on the site, such as "NOT FOR NAVIGATION. Please procure official charts for flight." Besides, I only simulate flying in my real Baron. If you have a real Baron, why (and how) would you simulate flight? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. I was partial to the Airnav site, since it also gave info on FBO's,
rental cars, nearby restaurants, etc., as well as the charts. Wasn't too happy with AOPA, since it took too much navigating to get the charts. Airnav was pretty easy. Will go to NACO now for the latest. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Viperdoc writes:
Thanks. I was partial to the Airnav site, since it also gave info on FBO's, rental cars, nearby restaurants, etc., as well as the charts. Wasn't too happy with AOPA, since it took too much navigating to get the charts. Airnav was pretty easy. Will go to NACO now for the latest. I suspect the AirNav stuff is identical to the "real" charts, and the disclaimer is mainly a legal requirement. The same holds true for other sites such as SkyVector. That way, if you use information from these sites, and if by unfortunate chance it happens to contain any kind of error, and you kill yourself in a plane as a result, it's your fault, not the fault of the sites in question. But in practice, it's the same information in the same format. There are times when I think the obsession with using only "authorized" and "certified" charts is a bit pathological. I can understand avoiding outdated charts, but when you can get a scan of a current chart online, where's the risk in using it? Are details on the charge going to be mystically mutated by the simple act of scanning them? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FSDO enforcement- GPS before effective date - which date to put in Aircraft Log for Part 43? | Ron A. | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | March 15th 06 02:30 PM |
Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 56 | December 2nd 03 08:08 AM |