![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:31:32 -0000, Jim Logajan
wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: The rec.aviation.stories newsgroup is not for follow up discussion, so it may not have been the right forum for this thread depending on what the OP had in mind when he started this message thread. You can of course modify the charter or try experimental (i.e. temporary) changes to the charter if you feel it would be useful. As moderator you pretty much "own" the group. That's the way I understand it too. But I think I'll stick with the original charter until a need to deviate presents itself. The stories group appears to have been dormant many years before the original moderator died. I believe that was due to Mr. Peck's lack of performing moderation duties during that period. I know I submitted stories, and they went into a black hole without any response. Perhaps allowing follow-ups might be useful - in this case the thread itself was a call for stories and it appears most of them would have been appropriate to that group. If anyone would like to publish their stories posted to this message thread, they can do so by posting them to rec.aviation.stories. They might even consider crossposting them to both newsgroups. IMHO I suspect the original r.a.s charter was flawed - shorter stories should have been allowed What do you feel would be a reasonable lower limit? How many words, lines or bytes? as well as follow-ups. I disagree with you here, with the possible exception of corrections. Follow up discussion can take place in the appropriate rec.aviation.* newsgroups. That will prevent the stories from being lost amongst the clutter of extemporaneous chit chat. In short, I believe the existence of an aviation newsgroup that is devoid of contentious argument and inane blather is worth preserving. There are plenty of other newsgroups that provide a forum for that sort of content already. Of course, I would prefer that the stories submitted to the rec.aviation.stories newsgroup were well written, perfectly formatted, grammatically correct, polished literary works that reflected positively on the aviation community, but I'm a realist. As the current acting moderator of the rec.aviation.stories newsgroup, I am committed to approving any story submitted that falls within the current charter guidelines. So, sharpen your quill, gather your wits, and commit your interesting, entertaining, informative and enlightening thoughts and experiences to an article submission, be it non-fiction or fictional, and post it to rec.aviation.stories. CHARTER rec.aviation.stories (MODERATED) A home for one of the greatest strengths of rec.aviation -- longer postings of stories and experiences, including descriptions of cross-country trips, "I learned about flying from that", airshow reports, and so on. The moderator will reject shorter articles and subjects which aren't appropriate to the group, and will ensure that articles meet minimum readability standards (i.e., line lengths). Follow-ups will be directed to other groups. It is expected that this group will typically contain only one or two articles a week. Articles for anonymous posting will be accepted. .... rec.aviation.stories A number of netters brought up this group as a very strong desire at Oshkosh. People felt that one of the greatest strengths of the net was the "I was there" stories -- stories which are very different from the semi-sanitized accounts one sees in commercial magazines. The desire was to have a forum for these longer stories, one in which (a) it could be ensured that they'd be easily found, (b) they wouldn't be intermixed with other stuff, and (c) they wouldn't get drowned out by follow-ups. A moderated newsgroup makes sense in this case, and also will allow a final formatting check to be done to ensure that the articles are easy to read (line lengths, etc.). .... Q: "Why _three_ moderated groups?" A: The three groups serve quite distinct purposes. Most readers will probably place .announce near the top of their reading lists, since it will be low-volume and will contain short articles. Readers will accord .stories a special place, since they'll want to take the time to sit down and enjoy the few articles which are posted to that group. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lost stories here | Danny Deger | Piloting | 68 | January 12th 07 12:43 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
Student Pilot Stories Wanted | Greg Burkhart | Piloting | 6 | September 18th 03 08:57 PM |